Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Classical heisenberg model at zero temperature

Mariya V Shcherbina

Published Oct 1, 1989• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01015515

Related papers

The heisenberg-Ising chain at zero temperature

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•0 citations

Critical temperature for the 2D Heisenberg model

E. Praveczki

Series, in powers of inverse coordination number, are derived for the critical temperature of 2D classical and quantum Heisenberg models from high-temperature series-expansion results. The results show convincingly that a phase transition occurs at a non-zero temperature.

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Apr 20, 1980•3 citations

Classical one-dimensional Heisenberg model with an interaction of finite range

T. Morita, T. Horiguchi

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jan 1, 1976•7 citations

Classical Heisenberg Model

G S Joyce

Exact expressions for the partition function, spin pair correlation function, and susceptibility of the onedimensional isotropic classical Heisenberg model are obtained in zero external field with cyclic boundary conditions. It is shown that the methods used to derive these results enable the partition functions and susceptibilities of finite clusters of interacting classical spins to be evaluated in terms of the $3n\ensuremath{-}j$ symbols of Wigner. Exact results in one dimension are also obtained for the partition function and susceptibility of a "planar" classical Heisenberg model. In this model the spin vectors interact via a Heisenberg coupling but each spin vector is restricted to lie in a plane.The anisotropic classical Heisenberg model described by the Hamiltonian $\mathcal{H}=\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{}{(\mathrm{ij})}2({{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{x}{{s}_{i}}^{x}{{s}_{j}}^{x}+{{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{y}{{s}_{i}}^{y}{{s}_{j}}^{y}+{{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{z}{{s}_{i}}^{z}{{s}_{j}}^{z})\ensuremath{-}mH\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{N}{j=1}{{s}_{i}}^{z},$ where ${{s}_{i}}^{x}$, ${{s}_{i}}^{y}$, and ${{s}_{i}}^{z}$ are components of the unit vector ${\mathbf{s}}_{i}$, is also considered. A perturbation series for the zero-field free energy of the anisotropic model in one dimension with nearest-neighbor interactions ${{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{x}={{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{y}=J$ and ${{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{z}=\ensuremath{\gamma}J$ is developed in powers of $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}1$ using the isotropic model as the unperturbed system. Detailed calculations are performed to third order in $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}1$. It is found that the perturbation series for the energy per spin breaks down as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. A high-temperature series expansion for the anisotropic model, which is valid for a general interaction potential and lattice, is derived by generalizing the methods developed by Horwitz and Callen for the Ising model. This series is rearranged to give a simplified diagram expansion. Finally, a practical technique for calculating the high-temperature series expansions of the zero-field free energy and susceptibility of the isotropic classical Heisenberg model is presented.

Physical Review•Mar 10, 1967•196 citations

On the high temperature susceptibility of the Heisenberg model

David W. Wood

Physics Letters•Feb 1, 1965•6 citations

Intermediate magnetization plateaus in the spin- 12 Ising-Heisenberg and Heisenberg models on two-dimensional triangulated lattices

Jana Čisárová, Frédéric Michaud, Frédéric Mila +1 more

The ground state and zero-temperature magnetization process of the spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg model on two-dimensional triangles-in-triangles lattices are exactly calculated using eigenstates of the smallest commuting spin clusters. Our ground-state analysis of the investigated classical-quantum spin model reveals three unconventional dimerized or trimerized quantum ground states besides two classical ground states. It is demonstrated that the spin frustration is responsible for a variety of magnetization scenarios with up to three or four intermediate magnetization plateaus of either quantum or classical nature. The exact analytical results for the Ising-Heisenberg model are confronted with the corresponding results for the purely quantum Heisenberg model, which were obtained by numerical exact diagonalizations based on the Lanczos algorithm for finite-size spin clusters of 24 and 21 sites, respectively. It is shown that the zero-temperature magnetization process of both models is quite reminiscent, and hence, one may obtain some insight into the ground states of the quantum Heisenberg model from the rigorous results for the Ising-Heisenberg model even though exact ground states for the Ising-Heisenberg model do not represent true ground states for the pure quantum Heisenberg model.

arXiv:1301.2103•Physical Review B•Feb 15, 2013•15 citations
Exact expressions for the partition function, spin pair correlation function, and susceptibility of the onedimensional isotropic classical Heisenberg model are obtained in zero external field with cyclic boundary conditions. It is shown that the methods used to derive these results enable the partition functions and susceptibilities of finite clusters of interacting classical spins to be evaluated in terms of the $3n\ensuremath{-}j$ symbols of Wigner. Exact results in one dimension are also obtained for the partition function and susceptibility of a "planar" classical Heisenberg model. In this model the spin vectors interact via a Heisenberg coupling but each spin vector is restricted to lie in a plane.The anisotropic classical Heisenberg model described by the Hamiltonian $\mathcal{H}=\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{}{(\mathrm{ij})}2({{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{x}{{s}_{i}}^{x}{{s}_{j}}^{x}+{{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{y}{{s}_{i}}^{y}{{s}_{j}}^{y}+{{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{z}{{s}_{i}}^{z}{{s}_{j}}^{z})\ensuremath{-}mH\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{N}{j=1}{{s}_{i}}^{z},$ where six{{s}_{i}}^{x}si​x, siy{{s}_{i}}^{y}si​y, and siz{{s}_{i}}^{z}si​z are components of the unit vector si{\mathbf{s}}_{i}si​, is also considered. A perturbation series for the zero-field free energy of the anisotropic model in one dimension with nearest-neighbor interactions Jijx=Jijy=J{{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{x}={{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{y}=JJij​x=Jij​y=J and ${{J}_{\mathrm{ij}}}^{z}=\ensuremath{\gamma}J$ is developed in powers of $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}1$ using the isotropic model as the unperturbed system. Detailed calculations are performed to third order in $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}1$. It is found that the perturbation series for the energy per spin breaks down as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. A high-temperature series expansion for the anisotropic model, which is valid for a general interaction potential and lattice, is derived by generalizing the methods developed by Horwitz and Callen for the Ising model. This series is rearranged to give a simplified diagram expansion. Finally, a practical technique for calculating the high-temperature series expansions of the zero-field free energy and susceptibility of the isotropic classical Heisenberg model is presented.
The ground state and zero-temperature magnetization process of the spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg model on two-dimensional triangles-in-triangles lattices are exactly calculated using eigenstates of the smallest commuting spin clusters. Our ground-state analysis of the investigated classical-quantum spin model reveals three unconventional dimerized or trimerized quantum ground states besides two classical ground states. It is demonstrated that the spin frustration is responsible for a variety of magnetization scenarios with up to three or four intermediate magnetization plateaus of either quantum or classical nature. The exact analytical results for the Ising-Heisenberg model are confronted with the corresponding results for the purely quantum Heisenberg model, which were obtained by numerical exact diagonalizations based on the Lanczos algorithm for finite-size spin clusters of 24 and 21 sites, respectively. It is shown that the zero-temperature magnetization process of both models is quite reminiscent, and hence, one may obtain some insight into the ground states of the quantum Heisenberg model from the rigorous results for the Ising-Heisenberg model even though exact ground states for the Ising-Heisenberg model do not represent true ground states for the pure quantum Heisenberg model.