Approximate treatment of ion dynamics in stark broadening theory

F. F. Baryshenkov, Valerii S. Lisitsa

J. S. Hildum, J. Cooper

H. J. Carmichael, Daniel F. Walls

Lyman Spitzer

The profile of a hydrogen emission line is investigated on the assumption that the hydrogen atom is perturbed by passing ions. Provided that the ions do not approach to within ten times the average atomic radius the electric field of the ion may be assumed homogeneous and the matrix elements calculated for the usual Stark effect may be used. For a collision at low velocity or with close approach, the adiabatic approximation is valid, and the profile depends solely on the total phase shift produced by the collision. The Fourier analysis of the wave train may be carried through exactly for certain values of this phase shift. Nonadiabatic transitions are examined for the lowest lines, and an exact solution given for this case also. For higher lines a modified Born approximation is used. The Weisskopf collision broadening formula is shown to hold only in certain cases, and the dispersion curve smearing function for impact broadening is shown to lead in some instances to incorrect results.

Haas, M, Ulrich D. Jentschura, Christoph H. Keitel

We compare the derivation of the dynamic Stark shift of hydrogenic energy levels in a classical framework with an adiabatically damped laser-atom interaction, which is equivalent to the Gell-Mann-Low-Sucher formula, and a treatment based on time-independent perturbation theory, with a second-quantized laser-atom dipole interaction Hamiltonian. Our analysis applies to a laser that excites a two-photon transition in atomic hydrogen or in a hydrogenlike ion with low nuclear charge number. Our comparisons serve to demonstrate why the dynamic Stark shift may be interpreted as a stimulated radiative correction and illustrates connections between the two derivations. The simplest of the derivations is the fully quantized approach. The classical and the second-quantized treatment are shown to be equivalent in the limit of large photon numbers.

Jagoš Purić, I. S. Lakićević, V. Glavonjić