Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Unbroken Quantum Realism, from Microscopic to Macroscopic Levels

David Böhm, Basil J. Hiley

Published Dec 2, 1985• 69 citations
Publisher

Abstract

By means of the quantum-potential interpretation we show that there is no need for a break or "cut" in the way we regard reality between quantum and classical levels.Received 6 August 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2511©1985 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.55.2511

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and Realism at the Macroscopic Level

A. J. Leggett

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Dec 1, 1986•8 citations

Publisher’s Note: Macroscopic Quantum Self-Trapping in Dynamical Tunneling [Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 080401 (2012)]

Sebastian Wüster, Beata J. Dąbrowska-Wüster, Matthew J. Davis

Received 22 August 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.099901© 2012 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Aug 31, 2012•1 citation

Quantum mechanics and macroscopic realism

A. J. Leggett

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1988•0 citations

Quantum Corrections to Thermally Activated Decay in SQUID Rings

Hermann Grabert, Peter Olschowski, U. Weiss

Received 7 November 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.265©1986 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jul 14, 1986•7 citations

Location of Renormalization-Group Fixed Points

Michael Ellis Fisher, Mohit Randeria

Received 17 December 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2332©1986 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 26, 1986•27 citations

The Concept of Reality in the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Gerd Christian Krizek

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2024•1 citation
By means of the quantum-potential interpretation we show that there is no need for a break or "cut" in the way we regard reality between quantum and classical levels.Received 6 August 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2511©1985 American Physical Society