Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences

An Efficient Non-interactive Universally Composable String-Commitment Scheme

Ryo Nishimaki, Eiichiro Fujisaki, Keisuke Tanaka

Published Jan 1, 2012• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper presents a new non-interactive string-commitment scheme that achieves universally composable security. Security is proven under the decisional composite residuosity (DCR) assumption (or the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption) in the common reference string (CRS) model. The universal composability (UC) is a very strong security notion. If cryptographic protocols are proven secure in the UC framework, then they remain secure even if they are composed with arbitrary protocols and polynomially many copies of the protocols are run concurrently. Many UC commitment schemes in the CRS model have been proposed, but they are either interactive commitment or bit-commitment (not string-commitment) schemes. We note, however, that although our scheme is the first non-interactive UC string-commitment scheme, a CRS is not reusable. We use an extension of all-but-one trapdoor functions (ABO-TDFs) proposed by Peikert and Waters at STOC 2008 as an essential building block. Our main idea is to extend (original deterministic) ABO-TDFs to probabilistic ones by using the homomorphic properties of their function indices. The function indices of ABO-TDFs consist of ciphertexts of homomorphic encryption schemes (such as ElGamal, and Damgård-Jurik encryption). Therefore we can re-randomize the output of ABO-TDFs by re-randomization of ciphertexts. This is a new application of ABO-TDFs.

DOI
10.1587/transfun.e95.a.167

Related papers

Efficient and Universally Composable Security Oblivious Transfer

Fenghua Li

Non-committing encryption achieved only semantic security,in contrast,applications often require security against chosen ciphertext attacks.A main ingredient in the previous adaptive universally composable(UC)oblivious transfer protocols are non-committing encryptions.the previous proposals are not UC secure against adaptive adversaries in the so-called non-erase model.A new UC secure oblivious transfer protocols were proposed and schemes utilize two primitives of the verifiably smooth projective hashing and deniable encryption as constructed by.the double trapdoor decryption mechanism based on trapdoor commitment.Our construction is based on the decisional composite residuosity in common reference string (CRS) model.We constructed a two-message(1-round) string oblivious transfer protocol,which improves computational efficient that supports message spaces of size exponential and save O(n)-1 rounds communications efficient than bit-OT protocols.

Dianzi xuebao•Jan 1, 2008•1 citation

Non-interactive and reusable non-malleable commitment schemes

Ivan Damgård, Jens Groth

We consider non-malleable (NM) and universally composable (UC) commitment schemes in the common reference string (CRS) model. We show how to construct non-interactive NM commitments that remain non-malleable even if the adversary has access to an arbitrary number of commitments from honest players - rather than one, as in several previous schemes. We show this is a strictly stronger security notion. Our construction is the first non-interactive scheme achieving this that can be based on the minimal assumption of existence of one-way functions. But it can also be instantiated in a very efficient version based on the strong RSA assumption. For UC commitments, we show that existence of a UC commitment scheme in the CRS model (interactive or not) implies key exchange and - for a uniform reference string - even implies oblivious transfer. This indicates that UC commitment is a strictly stronger primitive than NM. Finally, we show that our strong RSA based construction can be used to improve the most efficient known UC commitment scheme so it can work with a CRS of size independent of the number of players, without loss of efficiency.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 9, 2003•117 citations

A Framework for Efficient Fully-Equipped UC Commitments.

Eiichiro Fujisaki

We present a general framework for constructing non-interactive universally composable (UC) commitment schemes that are secure against adaptive adversaries in the non-erasure setting under a single re-usable common reference string. Previously, such “fully-equipped ” UC commitment schemes are only known in [8, 9], with an unavoidable overhead of O(κ) in the sense of communication and computational complexities; meaning that to commit λ bits, the communication and computational costs require O(λκ), where κ denotes the security parameter. Efficient construction of a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme was a long-standing open problem. We introduce a cryptographic primitive, called all-but-many encryptions (ABMEs), and prove that it is a translation of fully-equipped UC commitment in the primitive level. We then construct ABMEs from cryptographic primitives that we call a probabilistic pseudo random function family and extractable sigma protocols – the former is a probabilistic version of a pseudo random function family and the latter is a special kind of sigma (i.e., canonical 3-round public-coin HVSZK) protocols with some extractability. We provide fully-equipped UC commitment schemes from ABMEs under DDH and DCR-based assumptions, respectively. In particular, the DCR-based scheme is the first fully-equipped UC commitment scheme with optimal expansion factor Ω(1); to commit κ bits, the communication and computational costs are Ω(κ). We further construct a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme from a general assumption (in which trap-door permutations exist), which is far more efficient than the previous construction [9], because, unlike [9], our construction does not require non-interactive zero-knowledge proof systems. 1

•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation

Non-interactive and reusable non-malleable commitment schemes

Ivan Damgård, Jens Groth

We consider non-malleable (NM) and universally composable (UC) commitment schemes in the common reference string (CRS) model. We show how to construct non-interactive NM commitments that remain non-malleable even if the adversary has access to an arbitrary number of commitments from honest players - rather than one, as in several previous schemes. We show this is a strictly stronger security notion. Our construction is the first non-interactive scheme achieving this that can be based on the minimal assumption of existence of one-way functions. But it can also be instantiated in a very efficient version based on the strong RSA assumption. For UC commitments, we show that existence of a UC commitment scheme in the CRS model (interactive or not) implies key exchange and - for a uniform reference string - even implies oblivious transfer. This indicates that UC commitment is a strictly stronger primitive than NM. Finally, we show that our strong RSA based construction can be used to improve the most efficient known UC commitment scheme so it can work with a CRS of size independent of the number of players, without loss of efficiency.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jan 1, 2003•14 citations

Highly-Efficient Universally-Composable Commitments based on the DDH Assumption.

Yehuda Lindell

Universal composability (or UC security) provides very strong security guarantees for protocols that run in complex real-world environments. In particular, security is guaranteed to hold when the protocol is run concurrently many times with other secure and possibly insecure protocols. Commitment schemes are a basic building block in many cryptographic constructions, and as such universally composable commitments are of great importance in constructing UC-secure protocols. In this paper, we construct highly efficient UC-secure commitments from the standard DDH assumption, in the common reference string model. Our commitment stage is non-interactive, has a common reference string with O(1) group elements, and has complexity of O(1) exponentiations for committing to a group element (to be more exact, the effective cost is that of 23 1 exponentiations overall, for both the commit and decommit stages). We present 3 a construction that is secure in the presence of static adversaries, and a construction that is secure in the presence of adaptive adversaries with erasures, where the latter construction has an effective additional cost of just 5 1 3 exponentiations. 1

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

UC-Secure Non-interactive Public-Key Encryption

Jan L. Camenisch, Anja Lehmann, Gregory Neven +1 more

The universal composability (UC) framework enables the modular design of cryptographic protocols by allowing arbitrary compositions of lower-level building blocks. Public-key encryption is unarguably a very important such building block. However, so far no UC-functionality exists that offers non-interactive encryption necessary for modular protocol construction. We provide an ideal functionality for non-committing encryption (i.e., public-key encryption secure against adaptive corruptions) with locally generated, and therefore non-interactive, ciphertexts. As a sanity check, we also provide a property-based security notion that we prove to be equivalent to the UC notion. We then show that the encryption scheme of Camenisch et al. (SCN '16) based on trapdoor permutations securely implements our notion in the random-oracle model without assuming secure erasures. This is the best one can hope to achieve as standard-model constructions do not exist due to the uninstantiability of round-optimal adaptively secure message transfer in the standard model (Nielsen, Crypto '02). We illustrate the modular reusability of our functionality by constructing the first non-interactive signcryption scheme secure against adaptive corruptions without secure erasures in the UC framework.

IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW)•Aug 1, 2017•7 citations
This paper presents a new non-interactive string-commitment scheme that achieves universally composable security. Security is proven under the decisional composite residuosity (DCR) assumption (or the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption) in the common reference string (CRS) model. The universal composability (UC) is a very strong security notion. If cryptographic protocols are proven secure in the UC framework, then they remain secure even if they are composed with arbitrary protocols and polynomially many copies of the protocols are run concurrently. Many UC commitment schemes in the CRS model have been proposed, but they are either interactive commitment or bit-commitment (not string-commitment) schemes. We note, however, that although our scheme is the first non-interactive UC string-commitment scheme, a CRS is not reusable. We use an extension of all-but-one trapdoor functions (ABO-TDFs) proposed by Peikert and Waters at STOC 2008 as an essential building block. Our main idea is to extend (original deterministic) ABO-TDFs to probabilistic ones by using the homomorphic properties of their function indices. The function indices of ABO-TDFs consist of ciphertexts of homomorphic encryption schemes (such as ElGamal, and Damgård-Jurik encryption). Therefore we can re-randomize the output of ABO-TDFs by re-randomization of ciphertexts. This is a new application of ABO-TDFs.
Non-committing encryption achieved only semantic security,in contrast,applications often require security against chosen ciphertext attacks.A main ingredient in the previous adaptive universally composable(UC)oblivious transfer protocols are non-committing encryptions.the previous proposals are not UC secure against adaptive adversaries in the so-called non-erase model.A new UC secure oblivious transfer protocols were proposed and schemes utilize two primitives of the verifiably smooth projective hashing and deniable encryption as constructed by.the double trapdoor decryption mechanism based on trapdoor commitment.Our construction is based on the decisional composite residuosity in common reference string (CRS) model.We constructed a two-message(1-round) string oblivious transfer protocol,which improves computational efficient that supports message spaces of size exponential and save O(n)-1 rounds communications efficient than bit-OT protocols.
We consider non-malleable (NM) and universally composable (UC) commitment schemes in the common reference string (CRS) model. We show how to construct non-interactive NM commitments that remain non-malleable even if the adversary has access to an arbitrary number of commitments from honest players - rather than one, as in several previous schemes. We show this is a strictly stronger security notion. Our construction is the first non-interactive scheme achieving this that can be based on the minimal assumption of existence of one-way functions. But it can also be instantiated in a very efficient version based on the strong RSA assumption. For UC commitments, we show that existence of a UC commitment scheme in the CRS model (interactive or not) implies key exchange and - for a uniform reference string - even implies oblivious transfer. This indicates that UC commitment is a strictly stronger primitive than NM. Finally, we show that our strong RSA based construction can be used to improve the most efficient known UC commitment scheme so it can work with a CRS of size independent of the number of players, without loss of efficiency.
We present a general framework for constructing non-interactive universally composable (UC) commitment schemes that are secure against adaptive adversaries in the non-erasure setting under a single re-usable common reference string. Previously, such “fully-equipped ” UC commitment schemes are only known in [8, 9], with an unavoidable overhead of O(κ) in the sense of communication and computational complexities; meaning that to commit λ bits, the communication and computational costs require O(λκ), where κ denotes the security parameter. Efficient construction of a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme was a long-standing open problem. We introduce a cryptographic primitive, called all-but-many encryptions (ABMEs), and prove that it is a translation of fully-equipped UC commitment in the primitive level. We then construct ABMEs from cryptographic primitives that we call a probabilistic pseudo random function family and extractable sigma protocols – the former is a probabilistic version of a pseudo random function family and the latter is a special kind of sigma (i.e., canonical 3-round public-coin HVSZK) protocols with some extractability. We provide fully-equipped UC commitment schemes from ABMEs under DDH and DCR-based assumptions, respectively. In particular, the DCR-based scheme is the first fully-equipped UC commitment scheme with optimal expansion factor Ω(1); to commit κ bits, the communication and computational costs are Ω(κ). We further construct a fully-equipped UC commitment scheme from a general assumption (in which trap-door permutations exist), which is far more efficient than the previous construction [9], because, unlike [9], our construction does not require non-interactive zero-knowledge proof systems. 1
We consider non-malleable (NM) and universally composable (UC) commitment schemes in the common reference string (CRS) model. We show how to construct non-interactive NM commitments that remain non-malleable even if the adversary has access to an arbitrary number of commitments from honest players - rather than one, as in several previous schemes. We show this is a strictly stronger security notion. Our construction is the first non-interactive scheme achieving this that can be based on the minimal assumption of existence of one-way functions. But it can also be instantiated in a very efficient version based on the strong RSA assumption. For UC commitments, we show that existence of a UC commitment scheme in the CRS model (interactive or not) implies key exchange and - for a uniform reference string - even implies oblivious transfer. This indicates that UC commitment is a strictly stronger primitive than NM. Finally, we show that our strong RSA based construction can be used to improve the most efficient known UC commitment scheme so it can work with a CRS of size independent of the number of players, without loss of efficiency.
Universal composability (or UC security) provides very strong security guarantees for protocols that run in complex real-world environments. In particular, security is guaranteed to hold when the protocol is run concurrently many times with other secure and possibly insecure protocols. Commitment schemes are a basic building block in many cryptographic constructions, and as such universally composable commitments are of great importance in constructing UC-secure protocols. In this paper, we construct highly efficient UC-secure commitments from the standard DDH assumption, in the common reference string model. Our commitment stage is non-interactive, has a common reference string with O(1) group elements, and has complexity of O(1) exponentiations for committing to a group element (to be more exact, the effective cost is that of 23 1 exponentiations overall, for both the commit and decommit stages). We present 3 a construction that is secure in the presence of static adversaries, and a construction that is secure in the presence of adaptive adversaries with erasures, where the latter construction has an effective additional cost of just 5 1 3 exponentiations. 1
The universal composability (UC) framework enables the modular design of cryptographic protocols by allowing arbitrary compositions of lower-level building blocks. Public-key encryption is unarguably a very important such building block. However, so far no UC-functionality exists that offers non-interactive encryption necessary for modular protocol construction. We provide an ideal functionality for non-committing encryption (i.e., public-key encryption secure against adaptive corruptions) with locally generated, and therefore non-interactive, ciphertexts. As a sanity check, we also provide a property-based security notion that we prove to be equivalent to the UC notion. We then show that the encryption scheme of Camenisch et al. (SCN '16) based on trapdoor permutations securely implements our notion in the random-oracle model without assuming secure erasures. This is the best one can hope to achieve as standard-model constructions do not exist due to the uninstantiability of round-optimal adaptively secure message transfer in the standard model (Nielsen, Crypto '02). We illustrate the modular reusability of our functionality by constructing the first non-interactive signcryption scheme secure against adaptive corruptions without secure erasures in the UC framework.