Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Scientific American

The New Uncertainty Principle

David Appell

Published Jan 1, 2001• 89 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/scientificamerican0101-18

Related papers

A New View on the Uncertainty Principle

Jan Hilgevoord, Jos Uffink

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1990•21 citations

Uncertainty Principle

W. L. COWLEY

Nature•Mar 26, 1949•1 citation

Generalized uncertainty principles

Ronny Machluf

The phenomenon in the essence of classical uncertainty principles is well known since the thirties of the last century. We introduce a new phenomenon which is in the essence of a new notion that we introduce: "Generalized Uncertainty Principles". We show the relation between classical uncertainty principles and generalized uncertainty principles. We generalized "Landau-Pollak-Slepian" uncertainty principle. Our generalization relates the following two quantities and two scaling parameters: 1) The weighted time spreading $\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2w_1(x)dx$, ($w_1(x)$ is a non-negative function). 2) The weighted frequency spreading $\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\hat{f}(ω)|^2w_2(ω)dω$. 3) The time weight scale $a$, ${w_1}_a(x)=w_1(xa^{-1})$ and 4) The frequency weight scale $b$, ${w_2}_b(ω)=w_2(ωb^{-1})$. "Generalized Uncertainty Principle" is an inequality that summarizes the constraints on the relations between the two spreading quantities and two scaling parameters. For any two reasonable weights $w_1(x)$ and $w_2(ω)$, we introduced a three dimensional set in $R^3$ that is in the essence of many uncertainty principles. The set is called "possibility body". We showed that classical uncertainty principles (such as the Heiseneberg-Pauli-Weyl uncertainty principle) stem from lower bounds for different functions defined on the possibility body. We investigated qualitative properties of general uncertainty principles and possibility bodies. Using this approach we derived new (quantitative) uncertainty principles for Landau-Pollak-Slepian weights. We found the general uncertainty principles related to homogeneous weights, $w_1(x)=w_2(x)=x^k$, $k\in N$, up to a constant.

arXiv:0807.2190•Jul 14, 2008•4 citations

Uncertainty Principle

James M. Feagin

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•2 citations

Uncertainty Principles for Time-Frequency Representations

Karlheinz Gröchenig

We present a machine to produce new uncertainty principles from old ones. Traditionally an uncertainty principle is an inequality involving both a functionfand its Fourier transformf.To generate new uncertainty principles, we interpret the pair(f,f)as a time-frequency representation, replace it by a different time-frequency representation, and formulate a corresponding inequality. We discuss a few recent uncertainty principles for the short-time Fourier transform and the Wigner distribution that can be obtained in this way and suggest further problems.

Birkhäuser Boston eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•76 citations

UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 1, 2000•0 citations
The phenomenon in the essence of classical uncertainty principles is well known since the thirties of the last century. We introduce a new phenomenon which is in the essence of a new notion that we introduce: "Generalized Uncertainty Principles". We show the relation between classical uncertainty principles and generalized uncertainty principles. We generalized "Landau-Pollak-Slepian" uncertainty principle. Our generalization relates the following two quantities and two scaling parameters: 1) The weighted time spreading ∫−∞∞∣f(x)∣2w1(x)dx\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2w_1(x)dx∫−∞∞​∣f(x)∣2w1​(x)dx, (w1(x)w_1(x)w1​(x) is a non-negative function). 2) The weighted frequency spreading ∫−∞∞∣f^(ω)∣2w2(ω)dω\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\hat{f}(ω)|^2w_2(ω)dω∫−∞∞​∣f^​(ω)∣2w2​(ω)dω. 3) The time weight scale aaa, w1a(x)=w1(xa−1){w_1}_a(x)=w_1(xa^{-1})w1​a​(x)=w1​(xa−1) and 4) The frequency weight scale bbb, w2b(ω)=w2(ωb−1){w_2}_b(ω)=w_2(ωb^{-1})w2​b​(ω)=w2​(ωb−1). "Generalized Uncertainty Principle" is an inequality that summarizes the constraints on the relations between the two spreading quantities and two scaling parameters. For any two reasonable weights w1(x)w_1(x)w1​(x) and w2(ω)w_2(ω)w2​(ω), we introduced a three dimensional set in R3R^3R3 that is in the essence of many uncertainty principles. The set is called "possibility body". We showed that classical uncertainty principles (such as the Heiseneberg-Pauli-Weyl uncertainty principle) stem from lower bounds for different functions defined on the possibility body. We investigated qualitative properties of general uncertainty principles and possibility bodies. Using this approach we derived new (quantitative) uncertainty principles for Landau-Pollak-Slepian weights. We found the general uncertainty principles related to homogeneous weights, w1(x)=w2(x)=xkw_1(x)=w_2(x)=x^kw1​(x)=w2​(x)=xk, k∈Nk\in Nk∈N, up to a constant.
We present a machine to produce new uncertainty principles from old ones. Traditionally an uncertainty principle is an inequality involving both a functionfand its Fourier transformf.To generate new uncertainty principles, we interpret the pair(f,f)as a time-frequency representation, replace it by a different time-frequency representation, and formulate a corresponding inequality. We discuss a few recent uncertainty principles for the short-time Fourier transform and the Wigner distribution that can be obtained in this way and suggest further problems.