Physical Review A

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Solutions of the telegrapher’s equation in the presence of traps’ ’’

Jaume Masoliver A, Josep M. Porrà, George H. Weiss

Published Oct 1, 1992• 2 citations

Abstract

This reply adds a number of details to remarks by Foong and Kanno [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 46, 5296 (1992)] on our paper [Phys. Rev. A 45, 2222 (1992)] regarding the discontinuities observed in the curves generated in that paper.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.46.5298

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘The variational principle and simple properties of the ground-state wave function,’ ” by S. K. Foong, D. Kiang, and Y. Nogami [Am. J. Phys. 71 (7), 731 (2003)]

Jordi Mur-Petit, A. Polls, Ferran Mazzanti

American Journal of PhysicsJun 11, 20032 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Solution of the Schrödinger equation for the time-dependent linear potential’ ”

I. Guedes

In this reply I discuss further the misconception in my paper [Phys. Rev. A 63, 034102 (2001)] related to the solution of the Schr\"odinger equation for a particle in a time-dependent linear potential.

Physical Review AJul 8, 200318 citations

Reply to Comment on "Space-Time Crystals of Trapped Ions"

Tongcang Li, Zhexuan Gong, Zhang‐qi Yin +5 more

This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).

arXiv:1212.6959Dec 31, 20123 citations

Reply to the Comment by Wu on “Quantum telegraph: is it possible?” by B.B. Kadomtsev (Phys. Lett. A 210 (1996) 371)

Михаил Борисович Кадомцев

Physics Letters AMay 1, 19991 citation

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Langevin equation for the squeezing of light by means of a parametric oscillator’ ’’

Trevor W. Marshall

We try to place the preceding Comment by Kinsler and Drummond [Phys. Rev. A 44, 7848 (1991)] in an overall scientific context.Received 30 April 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.7851©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19912 citations

Further comment on ‘‘Optimization of approximate solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation’’

José M. Maidagan, Rubén Darío Piacentini

We show that the Reply of Weglein [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4025 (1985)] to our previous Comment [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4023 (1985)] is not valid.Received 18 September 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.933©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19870 citations