Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Time-dependent gauge transformations and Berry's phase

Jiu‐Qing Liang, Harald J W Müller-Kirsten

Published Oct 1, 1992• 20 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0003-4916(92)90311-9

Related papers

Time-dependent gauge transformations and Berry's phase

Theoretical Physics

Annals of Physics•Sep 1, 1992•0 citations

Berry Phase from Perturbative Gauge Freedom: Canonical Transformations and Semiclassical Limits

Jagmeet Singh

•Jun 28, 2026•0 citations

Broken gauge equivalence of Hamiltonians due to time-evolution and the Berry phase

J.-Q. Liang, X. X. Ding

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1991•10 citations

The Integrable Property and the Topological Property of the Berry's Phase

Aiping Zhang

A quantum system with time-dependent Hamiltonian which transports slowly will acquire an undynamic phase factor exp{ iγ n(t) } factor during evolution in addition to a dynamic phase factor. By means of time-dependent gauge transformation, we do a thorough study on undynamic phase which emerge in the quantum system. The results show that the system will gain an non-integrable phase when a periodic evolution doesn't accomplished; however, only when the system achieves a periodic evolution, an integrable phase will be acquire, namely Berry phase, and the phase is invariable under periodic time-dependent gauge transformation, thereby it is observable. Accordingly, we do a general interpretation on the topological property of Berry's phase as an example of NMR.

Journal of Chongqing University. English Edition•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Time-dependent perturbation theory by gauge transformations

Jeremy I. Musher

Annals of Physics•Dec 1, 1963•0 citations

Rigorous solutions, Berry phases and quantum-classical correspondence for time-dependent non-Hermitian SU(2)-SU(1, 1) Hamiltonians

JunLi XIN, Jiu‐Qing Liang, JunXia SHEN

Based on the generalized gauge transformation and invariant methods, we study in this work the rigorous solution for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians consisting of SU(1, 1) and SU(2) generators, which describe the harmonic oscillator and a single spin of arbitrary spin value, respectively, in periodically time-dependent fields. A non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenvalues is called pseudo-Hermitian. Such a Hamiltonian can be converted to a Hermitian one by a similarity transformation. We extend the concept of pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians to the time-dependent case. Under the generalized gauge transformation with a time-dependent Hermitian operator, the Hamiltonian becomes Hermitian and time-independent in the new gauge. The rigorous solution, as well as the Berry phase, is obtained by applying the inverse transformation to return to the original gauge. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is also solved in terms of non-Hermitian invariant operators, which possess conserved real eigenvalues. We derive the time-dependent solutions and corresponding geometric phases by eigenstate expansion of the invariant operators, combined with the time-evolution operator. It is observed that the non-Hermitian coupling constant indeed has an exceptional point Gc(ω) for the SU(2) non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, where all eigenstates are degenerate with zero eigenvalue and the Berry phase diverges. The eigenvalues become complex beyond Gc(ω) . However, the eigenvalues are real within the entire region of coupling constant for the SU(1, 1) system, different from the common belief that the exceptional point must exist in the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The classical counterpart of the SU(1, 1) non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is, in fact, a complex function of position-momentum variables. It can be converted to a real function via the generalized gauge transformation, accompanied by a canonical-variable transformation. This process corresponds exactly to the Hermitization procedure of the pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. We obtain the classical Hannay angle for the periodically time-dependent SU(1, 1) pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The non-adiabatic Hannay angle and the Berry phase satisfy precisely the quantum-classical correspondence, γn(T)=−(n+12)∆Θ .

Zhongguo kexue. Wulixue Lixue Tianwenxue•Jul 28, 2025•0 citations
A quantum system with time-dependent Hamiltonian which transports slowly will acquire an undynamic phase factor exp{ iγ n(t) } factor during evolution in addition to a dynamic phase factor. By means of time-dependent gauge transformation, we do a thorough study on undynamic phase which emerge in the quantum system. The results show that the system will gain an non-integrable phase when a periodic evolution doesn't accomplished; however, only when the system achieves a periodic evolution, an integrable phase will be acquire, namely Berry phase, and the phase is invariable under periodic time-dependent gauge transformation, thereby it is observable. Accordingly, we do a general interpretation on the topological property of Berry's phase as an example of NMR.
Based on the generalized gauge transformation and invariant methods, we study in this work the rigorous solution for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians consisting of SU(1, 1) and SU(2) generators, which describe the harmonic oscillator and a single spin of arbitrary spin value, respectively, in periodically time-dependent fields. A non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with real eigenvalues is called pseudo-Hermitian. Such a Hamiltonian can be converted to a Hermitian one by a similarity transformation. We extend the concept of pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians to the time-dependent case. Under the generalized gauge transformation with a time-dependent Hermitian operator, the Hamiltonian becomes Hermitian and time-independent in the new gauge. The rigorous solution, as well as the Berry phase, is obtained by applying the inverse transformation to return to the original gauge. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is also solved in terms of non-Hermitian invariant operators, which possess conserved real eigenvalues. We derive the time-dependent solutions and corresponding geometric phases by eigenstate expansion of the invariant operators, combined with the time-evolution operator. It is observed that the non-Hermitian coupling constant indeed has an exceptional point Gc(ω) for the SU(2) non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, where all eigenstates are degenerate with zero eigenvalue and the Berry phase diverges. The eigenvalues become complex beyond Gc(ω) . However, the eigenvalues are real within the entire region of coupling constant for the SU(1, 1) system, different from the common belief that the exceptional point must exist in the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The classical counterpart of the SU(1, 1) non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is, in fact, a complex function of position-momentum variables. It can be converted to a real function via the generalized gauge transformation, accompanied by a canonical-variable transformation. This process corresponds exactly to the Hermitization procedure of the pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. We obtain the classical Hannay angle for the periodically time-dependent SU(1, 1) pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The non-adiabatic Hannay angle and the Berry phase satisfy precisely the quantum-classical correspondence, γn(T)=−(n+12)∆Θ .