Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Historical Analysis and Open Questions

BOHM AND BOHMIAN MECHANICS

G. Introzzi, Marco Rossetti

Published Jun 1, 2006• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812773258_0017

Related papers

Bohmian Mechanics(de Broglie-Bohm Pilot Wave Theory): A Rapid Review

Bing-Ying Li, Jian-Ming Zhang, Yu-Cheng Chang +1 more

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

RANDOM AND ARBITRARY CONTINGENCIES IN HISTORY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY [8] – THE MARGINAL STATUS OF BOHMIAN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Yeuncheol Jeong

David Bohm transformed Schrödinger equation into a form of Newton’s second law of motion, revoking causality, determinism and realism in quantum mechanics. However, the newly created term of quantum potential in Bohm’s transformation is taken to be non-physical to many physicists. Besides, Bohm’s quantum mechanics came one generation later after Copenhagen counterpart. At the same time, Bohm could not advocate his quantum mechanics with other physicists, due to his involuntary exile from the US, leading to the marginality of his theory in the general physics community today.

International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Bohmian Mechanics

Detlef Dürr, Dustin Lazarovici

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Bohmian Mechanics

Detlef Dürr, Stefan Teufel

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•13 citations

AN ALTERNATIVE THEORY FOR THE BOHMIAN MECHANICS

MohammadJavad Kazemi, Mohammad Hosein Barati, Meysam Mashhadi

In this article, a causal model on the basis of trajectory is introduced for description of quantum systems. This theory is structurally very similar to Bohme mechanics, and like Bohme theory reproduces all statistical consequences of standard quantum mechanics. Particle trajectories in this model are different from anticipated ones by Bohme model. Quantum potential (force) form, which is given, is different from Bohme theory. Actually, this model will convert to Bohme theory by annihilating the free parameter ( μ ). Theoretical properties of this model are investigated in the same way as Galilean invariance. Also, a precise comparison between this theory and Bohme mechanics is made, and some suggestions are presented (through transit time distribution) for experimental distinction between these two models. Finally, extension of this theory is investigated

Iranian Journal of Physics Research•Sep 15, 2012•0 citations

Bohmian Mechanics

Detlev Dürr, Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka +1 more

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•17 citations
David Bohm transformed Schrödinger equation into a form of Newton’s second law of motion, revoking causality, determinism and realism in quantum mechanics. However, the newly created term of quantum potential in Bohm’s transformation is taken to be non-physical to many physicists. Besides, Bohm’s quantum mechanics came one generation later after Copenhagen counterpart. At the same time, Bohm could not advocate his quantum mechanics with other physicists, due to his involuntary exile from the US, leading to the marginality of his theory in the general physics community today.
In this article, a causal model on the basis of trajectory is introduced for description of quantum systems. This theory is structurally very similar to Bohme mechanics, and like Bohme theory reproduces all statistical consequences of standard quantum mechanics. Particle trajectories in this model are different from anticipated ones by Bohme model. Quantum potential (force) form, which is given, is different from Bohme theory. Actually, this model will convert to Bohme theory by annihilating the free parameter ( μ ). Theoretical properties of this model are investigated in the same way as Galilean invariance. Also, a precise comparison between this theory and Bohme mechanics is made, and some suggestions are presented (through transit time distribution) for experimental distinction between these two models. Finally, extension of this theory is investigated