Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

Classical stochasticity and quantum uncertainty in a simple quantum spin model

Holger Frahm, H.-J. Mikeska

Published Feb 1, 1986• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0304-8853(86)90784-5

Related papers

Agreement of stochastic soliton formalism with second-quantized and configuration-space models

John M. Fini, Peter L. Hagelstein, H. A. Haus

The stochastic theory presented by Drummond, Gardiner, and Walls [Phys. Rev. A 24, 914 (1981)] is an interesting approach to problems in quantum optics. In this theory, an exact, quantum evolution is written in terms of classical functions (not operators) driven by explicit, quantum noise. We examine the origin of uncertainty in the formalism through the simple example of a single, nonlinear oscillator. We then test the stochastic theory applied to the problem of soliton propagation. We extend the linearized stochastic model by computing analytically quantum uncertainties in the four basic soliton parameters: photon number, momentum, phase, and position. Agreement with second-quantized and configuration-space soliton theories verifies the stochastic formalism.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1998•8 citations

Universal quantum theory from dynamical consistency

Chiara Marletto, Vlatko Vedral

We argue for the universality of quantum theory using a dynamical consistency argument, within a specific Hamiltonian setting. We analyse two different types of coupling between simple quantum harmonic oscillators. Each illustrates an aspect of the free and interacting quantum fields and shows the inadequacy of semiclassical models. In particular, we establish that requiring the canonical algebra to be preserved under joint unitary dynamics rules out specific hybrid classical-quantum models. We apply our reasoning to the gravitational field in the linear regime, coupled to the quantised electromagnetic field and, separately, to quantised matter. We conclude with a comparison to DeWitt's analysis of quantum measurement, in which the apparatus, if classical, must be at least stochastic to preserve the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. We also note that stochastic models are inconsistent with the strict version of conservation principles, even if they comply with a probabilistic (on average) conservation.

quant-pharXiv:2608.17688•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

A stochastic approach to quantum spin systems

Stefano De Nicola

•Jan 1, 2019•1 citation

Stochastic quantum mechanics for particles with spin

L. de la Peña-Auerbach

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 1970•10 citations

The Schrödinger–Robinson inequality from stochastic analysis on a complex Hilbert space

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We explored the stochastic analysis on a complex Hilbert space to show that one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics (QM), namely Heisenberg's uncertainty relation, can be derived in the classical probabilistic framework. We created a new mathematical representation of quantum averages: as averages with respect to classical random fields. The existence of a classical stochastic model matching with Heisenberg's uncertainty relation makes the connection between classical and quantum probabilistic models essentially closer. In real physical situations, random fields are valued in the L2-space. Hence, although we model QM and not QFT, the classical systems under consideration have an infinite number of degrees of freedom. And in our modeling, infinite-dimensional stochastic analysis is the basic mathematical tool.

Physica Scripta•Feb 11, 2013•0 citations

Stochastic approach to non-equilibrium quantum spin dynamics

Samuel E. Begg

•Aug 1, 2021•0 citations
The stochastic theory presented by Drummond, Gardiner, and Walls [Phys. Rev. A 24, 914 (1981)] is an interesting approach to problems in quantum optics. In this theory, an exact, quantum evolution is written in terms of classical functions (not operators) driven by explicit, quantum noise. We examine the origin of uncertainty in the formalism through the simple example of a single, nonlinear oscillator. We then test the stochastic theory applied to the problem of soliton propagation. We extend the linearized stochastic model by computing analytically quantum uncertainties in the four basic soliton parameters: photon number, momentum, phase, and position. Agreement with second-quantized and configuration-space soliton theories verifies the stochastic formalism.
We argue for the universality of quantum theory using a dynamical consistency argument, within a specific Hamiltonian setting. We analyse two different types of coupling between simple quantum harmonic oscillators. Each illustrates an aspect of the free and interacting quantum fields and shows the inadequacy of semiclassical models. In particular, we establish that requiring the canonical algebra to be preserved under joint unitary dynamics rules out specific hybrid classical-quantum models. We apply our reasoning to the gravitational field in the linear regime, coupled to the quantised electromagnetic field and, separately, to quantised matter. We conclude with a comparison to DeWitt's analysis of quantum measurement, in which the apparatus, if classical, must be at least stochastic to preserve the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. We also note that stochastic models are inconsistent with the strict version of conservation principles, even if they comply with a probabilistic (on average) conservation.
We explored the stochastic analysis on a complex Hilbert space to show that one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics (QM), namely Heisenberg's uncertainty relation, can be derived in the classical probabilistic framework. We created a new mathematical representation of quantum averages: as averages with respect to classical random fields. The existence of a classical stochastic model matching with Heisenberg's uncertainty relation makes the connection between classical and quantum probabilistic models essentially closer. In real physical situations, random fields are valued in the L2-space. Hence, although we model QM and not QFT, the classical systems under consideration have an infinite number of degrees of freedom. And in our modeling, infinite-dimensional stochastic analysis is the basic mathematical tool.