Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures

Using quantum erasure to exorcise Maxwell's demon: II. Analysis

Yuri V. Rostovtsev, Zoe‐Elizabeth Sariyanni, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy, Marlan O. Scully

Published Jul 19, 2005• 13 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physe.2005.05.052

Related papers

Using quantum erasure to exorcize Maxwell's demon: I. Concepts and context

Marlan O. Scully, Yuri V. Rostovtsev, Zoe‐Elizabeth Sariyanni +1 more

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures•Jul 18, 2005•20 citations

Using quantum erasure to exorcize Maxwell's demon: III. Implementation

Zoe‐Elizabeth Sariyanni, Yuri V. Rostovtsev, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy +1 more

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures•Jul 13, 2005•12 citations

Maxwell's demon. (II) A quantum-theoretic exorcism

Elias P. Gyftopoulos

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•May 1, 2002•5 citations

Maxwell’s Demon in Quantum Mechanics

Orly Shenker, Meir Hemmo

Maxwell's Demon is a thought experiment devised by J. C. Maxwell in 1867 in order to show that the Second Law of thermodynamics is not universal, since it has a counter-example. Since the Second Law is taken by many to provide an arrow of time, the threat to its universality threatens the account of temporal directionality as well. Various attempts to "exorcise" the Demon, by proving that it is impossible for one reason or another, have been made throughout the years, but none of them were successful. We have shown (in a number of publications) by a general state-space argument that Maxwell's Demon is compatible with classical mechanics, and that the most recent solutions, based on Landauer's thesis, are not general. In this paper we demonstrate that Maxwell's Demon is also compatible with quantum mechanics. We do so by analyzing a particular (but highly idealized) experimental setup and proving that it violates the Second Law. Our discussion is in the framework of standard quantum mechanics; we give two separate arguments in the framework of quantum mechanics with and without the projection postulate. We address in our analysis the connection between measurement and erasure interactions and we show how these notions are applicable in the microscopic quantum mechanical structure. We discuss what might be the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical notion of "macrostates", thus explaining why our Quantum Demon setup works not only at the micro level but also at the macro level, properly understood. One implication of our analysis is that the Second Law cannot provide a universal lawlike basis for an account of the arrow of time; this account has to be sought elsewhere.

Entropy•Feb 27, 2020•8 citations

The Simplest Exorcism of Maxwell's Demon: The Quantum Version

John D. Norton

Norton (2013, Section 4) describes how a Maxwell’s demon can be exorcised merely by considerations of the conservation of phase volume in classical physics. This exorcism is generalized here to quantum physics.

•Mar 19, 2014•1 citation

Quantum Behavior of an Autonomous Maxwell Demon

Adrian Chapman, Akimasa Miyake

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2015•0 citations
Maxwell's Demon is a thought experiment devised by J. C. Maxwell in 1867 in order to show that the Second Law of thermodynamics is not universal, since it has a counter-example. Since the Second Law is taken by many to provide an arrow of time, the threat to its universality threatens the account of temporal directionality as well. Various attempts to "exorcise" the Demon, by proving that it is impossible for one reason or another, have been made throughout the years, but none of them were successful. We have shown (in a number of publications) by a general state-space argument that Maxwell's Demon is compatible with classical mechanics, and that the most recent solutions, based on Landauer's thesis, are not general. In this paper we demonstrate that Maxwell's Demon is also compatible with quantum mechanics. We do so by analyzing a particular (but highly idealized) experimental setup and proving that it violates the Second Law. Our discussion is in the framework of standard quantum mechanics; we give two separate arguments in the framework of quantum mechanics with and without the projection postulate. We address in our analysis the connection between measurement and erasure interactions and we show how these notions are applicable in the microscopic quantum mechanical structure. We discuss what might be the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical notion of "macrostates", thus explaining why our Quantum Demon setup works not only at the micro level but also at the macro level, properly understood. One implication of our analysis is that the Second Law cannot provide a universal lawlike basis for an account of the arrow of time; this account has to be sought elsewhere.