Physical Review Letters

Roy and Singh reply

Shasanka Mohan Roy, V. Singh

Published Nov 2, 1992• 0 citations

Abstract

S. M. Roy and V. Singh discuss comments made by K. A. Peacock on their Letter on the question of testing of locality of quantum mechanics.(AIP)Received 20 March 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2734©1992 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.69.2734

Related papers

Comment on ‘‘Tests of signal locality and Einstein-Bell locality for multiparticle systems’’

Kent A. Peacock

Physical Review LettersNov 2, 199210 citations

Comment on ‘‘Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories’’

Karin Berndl, Sheldon Goldstein

Physical Review LettersJan 31, 199423 citations

Cary, Rusu, and Skodje reply

J. R. Cary, Petre Rusu, Rex T. Skodje

Physical Review LettersAug 24, 19872 citations

Can Classical and Quantum Variables have a Consistent Mutual Interaction?

I. R. Senitzky

A Comment on the Letter by Arlen Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 621 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 13 March 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4089©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersMay 20, 199615 citations

Comment on ‘‘Scalar Aharonov-Bohm experiment with neutrons’’

Murray Peshkin

Physical Review LettersSep 28, 199218 citations

Griffiths replies

Robert B. Griffiths

A reply to the objections asserting that an interpretation based on quantum trajectories and consistent histories is unacceptable on physical grounds is made. (AIP)Received 23 December 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1771©1994 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersMar 14, 19940 citations