Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics

Stochastic final-state dynamics of widening entanglement—a possible description of quantum measurement

Karl-Erik Eriksson

Published Mar 30, 2009• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The measurement process of quantum mechanics is analysed in the scattering theory of quantum field theory. A matrix of bilinear forms of the scattering amplitudes (the R-matrix) is used as the basic descriptive tool. The measurement process is viewed as a final-state interaction described through a series of linear stochastic mappings of the R-matrix, not changing the observable to be measured. The unknown details of the measurement apparatus enter through the stochasticity of the mappings. Although linear in terms of the R-matrix, the mappings are nonlinear in the density matrix, which is obtainable from the R-matrix through normalization. The eigenstates of the observable are the attractors of the mapping process. This result, known from previous generalizations of quantum mechanics, is obtained here within linear quantum mechanics. The conclusion is that the measurement process can be understood within relativistic quantum field theory itself without any generalization or metatheory.

DOI
10.1088/0953-4075/42/8/085001

Related papers

Quantum Measurement as a Stochastic Entanglement Race

Karl‐Erik Eriksson

The thesis of this paper is that quantum measurement can be analyzed and understood within quantum mechanics itself. The statistics of the measurement process comes from the unknown details of the macroscopic measurement device. Quantum measurement is analyzed within the framework of scattering theory of quantum field theory with the aim of finding a physical rather than a metaphysical understanding. The measurement interaction is treated together with the quantum process to be measured. The evaluation of a Feynman diagram for the total process leads to one factor from the measurement interaction for each channel multiplying the basic scattering amplitudes. With increasing entanglement taken into account, these factors compete for dominance. They depend on unknown details of the measurement apparatus. The statistics of this competition is studied under the assumption that the measurement interaction does not introduce any bias. A binary quantum system is analyzed and after that the n-channel case. As a background, a couple of classical examples are shown, leading to the same selective mechanisms. The result of this analysis is that the quantum measurement process can be understood, whether a single measurement or an ensemble of measurements, as a result of an ordinary unitary time development, based on the interaction beteen the system subjet to measurement and the measurement apparatus. This result makes it possible to view the quantum-mechanical state as describing reality rather than merely a potentiality. This opens again for an ontology of physics, and hence for science in general.

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Quantum Measurement as a Final-State Interaction with a Macroscopic External System

K. -E. L. Eriksson

A small quantum scattering system (the microsystem) is studied in interaction with a large system (the macrosystem) described by unknown stochastic variables. The interaction between the two systems is diagonal for the microsystem in a certain orthonormal basis, and the interaction gives an imprint on the macrosystem. Moreover, the interaction is assumed to involve only small transfers of energy and momentum between the two systems (as compared to typical energies/momenta within the microsystem). The analysis is carried out within scattering theory. Calculated in the conventional way, the transition amplitude for the whole system factorizes. The interaction taking place within the macrosystem is assumed to depend on the stochastic variables in such a way that, on the average, no particular basis vector state of the microsystem is favoured. The density matrix is studied in a formalism which includes generation of the ingoing state and absorption of the final state. Then the dependence of the final state on the conventional scattering amplitude for the microsystem is highly non-linear. In the thermodynamic limit of the macrosystem, the density matrix of the ensemble (of microsystem plus macrosystem) develops into a final state which involves a set of macroscopically distinguishable states, each with the microsystem in one of the basis vector states and the macrosystem in an entangled state. For an element of the ensemble, i.e., for a single measurement, the result is instead a random walk, where the microsystem ends up in one of the basis vector states (reduction of the wave packet).

arXiv:0705.1649•May 11, 2007•0 citations

Measurement as soft final-state interaction with a stochastic system

Eriksson, Karl-Erik

A small quantum scattering system (the microsystem) is studied in interaction with a large quantum system (the macrosystem) described by unknown stochastic variables. The interaction between the two systems is diagonal for the microsystem in a certain basis, and it leads to an imprint on the macrosystem. Moreover, the interaction is assumed to involve only small transfers of energy and momentum between the two systems (as compared to typical energies/momenta within the microsystem). This makes it suitable to carry out the analysis in scattering theory, where the transition amplitude for the whole system factorizes. The interaction taking place within the macrosystem is assumed to depend on the stochastic variables in such a way that, on the average, no particular channel is favoured. The result is then, in the thermodynamic limit of the macrosystem, that the whole system bifurcates and the microsystem ends up in a state described by one of the basis vectors (in the mentioned basis). The macrosystem ends up in an entangled state tied to this basis vector. For the ensemble of macrosystems, the interaction with the microsystem leads, on the average, to the usual decoherence and diagonal density matrix for the microsystem. The macrosystem can be interpreted as representing a measurement device for performing a measurement on the microsystem. The whole discussion is carried out within quantum mechanics itself without any modification or generalization.

arXiv:quant-ph/0206099•Jun 14, 2002•3 citations

Classical interventions in quantum systems. I. The measuring process

Asher Peres

The measuring process is an external intervention in the dynamics of a quantum system. It involves a unitary interaction of that system with a measuring apparatus, a further interaction of both with an unknown environment causing decoherence, and then the deletion of a subsystem. This description of the measuring process is a substantial generalization of current models in quantum measurement theory. In particular, no ancilla is needed. The final result is represented by a completely positive map of the quantum state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ (possibly with a change of the dimensions of $\ensuremath{\rho}).$ A continuous limit of the above process leads to Lindblad's equation for the quantum-dynamical semigroup [Commun. Math. Phys. $48,$ 119 (1976)].

arXiv:quant-ph/9906023•Physical Review A•Jan 18, 2000•54 citations

Measurement in Quantum Field Theory

Christopher J. Fewster, Rainer Verch

The topic of measurement in relativistic quantum field theory is addressed in this article. Some of the long standing problems of this subject are highlighted, including the incompatibility of an instantaneous ``collapse of the wavefunction'' with relativity of simultaneity, and the difficulty of maintaining causality in the rules for measurement highlighted by ``impossible measurement'' scenarios. Thereafter, the issue is considered from the perspective of mathematical physics. To this end, quantum field theory is described in a model-independent, operator algebraic setting, on generic Lorentzian spacetime manifolds. The process of measurement is modelled by a localized dynamical coupling between a quantum field called the ``system'', and another quantum field, called the ``probe''. The result of the dynamical coupling is a scattering map, whereby measurements carried out on the probe can be interpreted as measurements of induced observables on the system. The localization of the dynamical coupling allows it to derive causal relations for the induced observables. It will be discussed how this approach leads to the concept of selective or non-selective system state updates conditioned on the result of probe measurements, which in turn allows it to obtain conditional probabilities for consecutive probe measurements consistent with relativistic causality and general covariance, without the need for a physical collapse of the wavefunction. In particular, the problem of impossible measurements is resolved. Finally, there is a brief discussion of accelerated detectors and other related work.

arXiv:2304.13356•Apr 26, 2023•2 citations

Relativistic state reduction model

Daniel Bedingham

In order to address the measurement problem of quantum theory we make the assumption that quantum state reduction should be regarded as a genuine physical process deserving of a dynamical description. Generalizing the nonrelativistic spontaneous localization models of Ghirardi, Rimini, Weber, and Pearle, a relativistic state reduction mechanism is proposed. The mechanism involves nonlinear stochastic modifications to the standard description of unitary state evolution and the introduction of a mediating field to facilitate smearing of quantum field interactions.

•Jan 1, 2011•20 citations
The measurement process of quantum mechanics is analysed in the scattering theory of quantum field theory. A matrix of bilinear forms of the scattering amplitudes (the R-matrix) is used as the basic descriptive tool. The measurement process is viewed as a final-state interaction described through a series of linear stochastic mappings of the R-matrix, not changing the observable to be measured. The unknown details of the measurement apparatus enter through the stochasticity of the mappings. Although linear in terms of the R-matrix, the mappings are nonlinear in the density matrix, which is obtainable from the R-matrix through normalization. The eigenstates of the observable are the attractors of the mapping process. This result, known from previous generalizations of quantum mechanics, is obtained here within linear quantum mechanics. The conclusion is that the measurement process can be understood within relativistic quantum field theory itself without any generalization or metatheory.
The thesis of this paper is that quantum measurement can be analyzed and understood within quantum mechanics itself. The statistics of the measurement process comes from the unknown details of the macroscopic measurement device. Quantum measurement is analyzed within the framework of scattering theory of quantum field theory with the aim of finding a physical rather than a metaphysical understanding. The measurement interaction is treated together with the quantum process to be measured. The evaluation of a Feynman diagram for the total process leads to one factor from the measurement interaction for each channel multiplying the basic scattering amplitudes. With increasing entanglement taken into account, these factors compete for dominance. They depend on unknown details of the measurement apparatus. The statistics of this competition is studied under the assumption that the measurement interaction does not introduce any bias. A binary quantum system is analyzed and after that the n-channel case. As a background, a couple of classical examples are shown, leading to the same selective mechanisms. The result of this analysis is that the quantum measurement process can be understood, whether a single measurement or an ensemble of measurements, as a result of an ordinary unitary time development, based on the interaction beteen the system subjet to measurement and the measurement apparatus. This result makes it possible to view the quantum-mechanical state as describing reality rather than merely a potentiality. This opens again for an ontology of physics, and hence for science in general.
A small quantum scattering system (the microsystem) is studied in interaction with a large system (the macrosystem) described by unknown stochastic variables. The interaction between the two systems is diagonal for the microsystem in a certain orthonormal basis, and the interaction gives an imprint on the macrosystem. Moreover, the interaction is assumed to involve only small transfers of energy and momentum between the two systems (as compared to typical energies/momenta within the microsystem). The analysis is carried out within scattering theory. Calculated in the conventional way, the transition amplitude for the whole system factorizes. The interaction taking place within the macrosystem is assumed to depend on the stochastic variables in such a way that, on the average, no particular basis vector state of the microsystem is favoured. The density matrix is studied in a formalism which includes generation of the ingoing state and absorption of the final state. Then the dependence of the final state on the conventional scattering amplitude for the microsystem is highly non-linear. In the thermodynamic limit of the macrosystem, the density matrix of the ensemble (of microsystem plus macrosystem) develops into a final state which involves a set of macroscopically distinguishable states, each with the microsystem in one of the basis vector states and the macrosystem in an entangled state. For an element of the ensemble, i.e., for a single measurement, the result is instead a random walk, where the microsystem ends up in one of the basis vector states (reduction of the wave packet).
A small quantum scattering system (the microsystem) is studied in interaction with a large quantum system (the macrosystem) described by unknown stochastic variables. The interaction between the two systems is diagonal for the microsystem in a certain basis, and it leads to an imprint on the macrosystem. Moreover, the interaction is assumed to involve only small transfers of energy and momentum between the two systems (as compared to typical energies/momenta within the microsystem). This makes it suitable to carry out the analysis in scattering theory, where the transition amplitude for the whole system factorizes. The interaction taking place within the macrosystem is assumed to depend on the stochastic variables in such a way that, on the average, no particular channel is favoured. The result is then, in the thermodynamic limit of the macrosystem, that the whole system bifurcates and the microsystem ends up in a state described by one of the basis vectors (in the mentioned basis). The macrosystem ends up in an entangled state tied to this basis vector. For the ensemble of macrosystems, the interaction with the microsystem leads, on the average, to the usual decoherence and diagonal density matrix for the microsystem. The macrosystem can be interpreted as representing a measurement device for performing a measurement on the microsystem. The whole discussion is carried out within quantum mechanics itself without any modification or generalization.
The measuring process is an external intervention in the dynamics of a quantum system. It involves a unitary interaction of that system with a measuring apparatus, a further interaction of both with an unknown environment causing decoherence, and then the deletion of a subsystem. This description of the measuring process is a substantial generalization of current models in quantum measurement theory. In particular, no ancilla is needed. The final result is represented by a completely positive map of the quantum state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ (possibly with a change of the dimensions of $\ensuremath{\rho}).$ A continuous limit of the above process leads to Lindblad's equation for the quantum-dynamical semigroup [Commun. Math. Phys. 48,48,48, 119 (1976)].
The topic of measurement in relativistic quantum field theory is addressed in this article. Some of the long standing problems of this subject are highlighted, including the incompatibility of an instantaneous ``collapse of the wavefunction'' with relativity of simultaneity, and the difficulty of maintaining causality in the rules for measurement highlighted by ``impossible measurement'' scenarios. Thereafter, the issue is considered from the perspective of mathematical physics. To this end, quantum field theory is described in a model-independent, operator algebraic setting, on generic Lorentzian spacetime manifolds. The process of measurement is modelled by a localized dynamical coupling between a quantum field called the ``system'', and another quantum field, called the ``probe''. The result of the dynamical coupling is a scattering map, whereby measurements carried out on the probe can be interpreted as measurements of induced observables on the system. The localization of the dynamical coupling allows it to derive causal relations for the induced observables. It will be discussed how this approach leads to the concept of selective or non-selective system state updates conditioned on the result of probe measurements, which in turn allows it to obtain conditional probabilities for consecutive probe measurements consistent with relativistic causality and general covariance, without the need for a physical collapse of the wavefunction. In particular, the problem of impossible measurements is resolved. Finally, there is a brief discussion of accelerated detectors and other related work.
In order to address the measurement problem of quantum theory we make the assumption that quantum state reduction should be regarded as a genuine physical process deserving of a dynamical description. Generalizing the nonrelativistic spontaneous localization models of Ghirardi, Rimini, Weber, and Pearle, a relativistic state reduction mechanism is proposed. The mechanism involves nonlinear stochastic modifications to the standard description of unitary state evolution and the introduction of a mediating field to facilitate smearing of quantum field interactions.