Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Trivedi and Makivic Reply

Nandini Trivedi, M. S. Makivić

Published Feb 6, 1995• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In response to a recent comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 1038 (1995)], the authors further their Monte Carlo study of the two[minus]dimensional dirty boson problem. (AIP)
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.74.1039

Related papers

Dirty bosons in 1D: A quantum Monte Carlo study (Poster)

Guilhem Boéris, Giuseppe Carleo, Laurent Sanchez-Palencia

•Jun 1, 2013•0 citations

Comment on “Gaussian Quantum Monte Carlo Methods for Fermions and Bosons”

S. Rombouts

A Comment on the Letter by J. F. Corney and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 260401 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 11 November 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.188901©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 8, 2006•3 citations

Ding and Makivić reply

Hong Q. Ding, M. S. Makivić

In the reply to the comment on quantum fluctuations in spin 1/2 systems, the authors state that the claim that the fluctuations cause only 20% is erroneous.(AIP)Received 19 June 1990DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1520©1990 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 17, 1990•1 citation

Comment on "superconductivity in the two-dimensional t- J model" [4] (multiple letters)

T. K. Lee, C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen +8 more

Physical Review Letters•Jan 1, 2002•5 citations

Comment on"One-Particle Ecxitation of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model"

Osamu Narikiyo, Satoshi Fujimoto

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 15, 1998•3 citations

Critical Exponents of the Classical Heisenberg Ferromagnet

Christian Holm, Wolfhard Janke E

In a recent letter, R.G. Brown and M. Ciftan (Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1352, 1996) reported high precision Monte Carlo (MC) estimates of the static critical exponents of the classical 3D Heisenberg model, which stand in sharp contrast to values obtained by four independent approaches, namely by other recent high statistics MC simulations, high-temperature series analyses, field theoretical methods, and experimental studies. In reply to the above cited work we submitted this paper as a comment to Phys. Rev. Lett.

arXiv:hep-lat/9605024•Physical Review Letters•Mar 17, 1997•18 citations
In a recent letter, R.G. Brown and M. Ciftan (Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1352, 1996) reported high precision Monte Carlo (MC) estimates of the static critical exponents of the classical 3D Heisenberg model, which stand in sharp contrast to values obtained by four independent approaches, namely by other recent high statistics MC simulations, high-temperature series analyses, field theoretical methods, and experimental studies. In reply to the above cited work we submitted this paper as a comment to Phys. Rev. Lett.