The perennial aspect of the Newtonian foundation of mathematical physics is that the concept of ``motion,'' that is, ``kinematics,'' is to serve as the interface between mathematics and physics. Kinematics subdivides into the theory of orbital translation and that of undulation and spinning. Newtonian mechanics is based on giving to translational kinematics a priority over the other modes, since planetary revolution can be represented as translation modified by gravitation. The so-called breakdown of classical physics stems from giving the translational priority a canonical status and extending it to the constituents of matter. We claim that in this case the priority is to be reversed. The main content of this paper is to establish the algebraic model for an indivisible, undulating entity that we call a ``wave simplex.'' It is used as the point of departure for a non-Newtonian quantum dynamics in which physical and algebraic concepts are in close correspondence. The postulates of the classical phenomenological theories and those of the canonical theories based on translational priority are established as theorems under the proper limiting conditions, and forces are constructed rather than postulated. While the formal structure of two-level quantum mechanics is established as well, exception is taken to treating spin as a property of a point particle. It is considered self-evident that a spinning object is orientable, a property accounted for in terms of a unitary triplet. This is the point of departure for an intrinsic particle dynamics. A main result is the integration of classical and quantum physics, thus closing the gap created by the heuristic method of canonical quantization.
The perennial aspect of the Newtonian foundation of mathematical physics is that the concept of motion,'' that is, kinematics,'' is to serve as the interface between mathematics and physics. Kinematics subdivides into the theory of orbital translation and that of undulation and spinning. Newtonian mechanics is based on giving to translational kinematics a priority over the other modes, since planetary revolution can be represented as translation modified by gravitation. The so-called breakdown of classical physics stems from giving the translational priority a canonical status and extending it to the constituents of matter. We claim that in this case the priority is to be reversed. The main content of this paper is to establish the algebraic model for an indivisible, undulating entity that we call a ``wave simplex.'' It is used as the point of departure for a non-Newtonian quantum dynamics in which physical and algebraic concepts are in close correspondence. The postulates of the classical phenomenological theories and those of the canonical theories based on translational priority are established as theorems under the proper limiting conditions, and forces are constructed rather than postulated. While the formal structure of two-level quantum mechanics is established as well, exception is taken to treating spin as a property of a point particle. It is considered self-evident that a spinning object is orientable, a property accounted for in terms of a unitary triplet. This is the point of departure for an intrinsic particle dynamics. A main result is the integration of classical and quantum physics, thus closing the gap created by the heuristic method of canonical quantization.
Quantum mechanics is among the most successful physical theories, yet its formulation and empirical testing rely on classical structures. Following Lev Landau and Niels Bohr, this reliance is not merely pragmatic: quantum observables acquire empirical meaning only relative to classical reference frames, and, in practice, quantization starts from classical models. At the same time, the two domains display forms of mutual irreducibility: intrinsically quantum features (that is, spin and exchange statistics) have no counterpart in the phase-space ontology of classical point-particle mechanics, while classical trajectory chaos does not arise straightforwardly from unitary quantum evolution in closed systems. A hierarchy is commonly established between classical and quantum theories, namely, a claim of ontological and explanatory priority according to which quantum mechanics is fundamental and classical mechanics is only a limiting case. This claim is less secure than is often assumed; therefore, the traditional hierarchy deserves to be examined. In this paper, we argue that a quantum–classical framework provides an effective and structurally faithful representation of empirically accessible physical systems in regimes where quantum and classical degrees of freedom coexist within a single, consistent effective dynamical description. To give this point of view a firm theoretical basis, we discuss the quasi-Lie formal structure underlying quantum–classical hybrid dynamics, with applications ranging from gravity and condensed matter to open, driven systems in biology and complex media.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
This paper derives the non-relativistic time-dependent Schrödinger equation as the logically unavoidable dynamical law for de Broglie matter waves, extending the reconstruction begun in the companion work “The Logical Origin of the de Broglie Matter Wave and its Physical Meaning (the Born Rule)” (Chan, 2026). Starting from the same minimal premises—continuous position in real space, Fourier conjugacy (and the logical uncertainty principle), translation invariance via Noether’s theorem, and probability conservation via statistical energy flux—the Schrödinger equation follows deductively once norm preservation and classical non-relativistic correspondence are enforced. The derivation proceeds in clear stages: Plane-wave solutions for free particles and constant potentials, Quadratic dispersion relation from classical kinematics, Exact local plane-wave structure (defined via phase gradients) that must hold at every point for any smooth wave function, The unique linear differential operator of order ≤ 2 that consistently “glues” these local structures across smooth external potentials V(x,t) while preserving the L²-norm (unitarity). No canonical quantization, operator promotion, commutation relations, or postulated wave equations are used. The Born rule is taken as already established from the prior paper and serves only to constrain unitary evolution. The Schrödinger equation thus emerges not as an empirical postulate or convenient ansatz, but as the mathematically and symmetrically forced description of indivisible particles propagating in continuous, translationally invariant (or smoothly perturbed) space. Domain of validity and natural limitations (non-relativistic kinematics, smooth potentials, single-particle/mean-field regime, closed-system unitarity) are explicitly delineated.
We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.
Classical and quantum physics represent two distinct theories; however, quantum physics is regarded as the more fundamental of the two. It is posited that classical mechanics should arise from quantum mechanics under certain limiting conditions. Nevertheless, this remains a challenging objective. In this work, we explore the potential for unifying the dynamics of classical and quantum physics. This discussion does not suggest that classical behavior emerges from quantum mechanics; rather, it demonstrates the exact equivalence between the dynamics of quantum observables and their classical counterparts. It is shown that the Heisenberg equations of motion can be cast in a form that is structurally equivalent to Newton's equations of motion, with ℏ dropping out from the equations. In a generalized analysis, the Heisenberg equations are cast in a form that is identical to the classical Hamilton's equations of motion. This implies that both quantum and classical dynamics are governed by the same form of equations, with the Heisenberg operators substituting the classical observables.
Classical mechanics and electromagnetismThe mechanics of motion formulated by Newton and contemporaries in the 17th century is the foundation of contemporary physics.It is immensely successful, explaining and quantifying a vast array of phenomena, ranging from planetary motion to the flow of fluids.By the latter part of the 19th century the study of electric and magnetic fields and their inclusion in the framework of Newtonian physics appeared near completion.Since motion and electromagnetism are central to the failures of Newtonian physics in the atomic realm, it is useful to review the essential ideas, concepts, and the implicit assumptions of what is now referred to as classical physics.Many of the results presented in this chapter are assumed to be familiar to the reader, but some concepts are more thoroughly presented because of their relevance to quantum mechanics. Newtonian mechanicsFor simplicity initial consideration is limited to a single point particle of inertial mass m.A point particle is treated as infinitesimally small and indivisible.It is possible to formulate Newtonian mechanics in terms of continuous matter distributions, referred to as continuum mechanics, but these will not be considered in this text.In that regard, point particles are often used as an approximation to the constituents of real matter in Newtonian mechanics.A point particle's position therefore coincides with a point in space at every given moment of time, parameterized with t, and can be described mathematically by a vector x from the choice of origin to that point.As the point particle moves its position is given by the time-dependent trajectory x t ( ).An important assumption of Newtonian mechanics is that all observers are equipped with identical meter sticks and synchronized clocks, and they all agree upon the current position at the time t, although the choice of each observer's origin is arbitrary.The Cartesian components of the vector trajectory are denoted x t ( ) i , where the subscript i runs over the dimensions of the space under consideration.In one dimension the subscript is