Discussion: Quantum Physics, the Identity of Indiscernibles, and Some Unanswered Questions

Allen Ginsberg

Malcolm H. Mac Gregor

Tomasz Bigaj

Matteo Morganti

Emily Adlam

It has often been suggested that similar quantum particles may be a counterexample to the principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles. In this article, I discuss the status of indiscernibility in a perspectival approach to quantum mechanics. I argue that adopting an internal physical perspective can have the effect of making entities discernible even if they are not discernible relative to external reference frames, and thus perspectivalism offers a new way to understand the physical meaning of weak discernibility. I discuss whether this approach is circular, and I consider whether the reference frames involved are physically meaningful. I conclude that the Identify of Indiscernibles can probably be maintained in this context, though there are outstanding questions pertaining to the meaning of the quantum state and the way in which a system should be represented in its own reference frame.

Décio Krause

The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) is one of the most debatably discussed subjects in the philosophy of quantum physics. Gen- erally, the discussions focus on the domain of the predicate variables involved in the standard formulation of the principle, with versions where the properties are restricted in several ways. We argue that if we restrict the domain of properties, as happens with Henkin semantics for second- order language, we have no more PII, but only a weaker form of indistin- guishability. In quantum physics, we claim that under the non-individuals interpretation, which accepts that the standard notion of identity does not apply to quantum entities, PII fails not because of the properties, but due to the lack of sense of the notion of identity involved in the principle.