Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Criticizing Bell: Local realism and quantum physics reconciled

Claudio Garola

Published Feb 1, 1995• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00672805

Related papers

Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: A critique to Bell

Claudio Garola

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•May 1, 1994•7 citations

Reconciling Local Realism with Quantum Mechanics: The Generalized BCHSH Inequalities

Claudio Garola, Sandro Sozzo

Most physicists uphold that the tests of the Bell-Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt (BCHSH) inequalities confirm quantum mechanics (QM) and refute local realism. Some scholars, however, criticize this conviction, yet maintaining that QM conflicts with local realism. At variance with both viewpoints one of the authors has recently worked out an extended semantic realism (ESR) model which shows that, if quantum probabilities are interpreted as conditional rather than absolute probabilities, a picture of the microworld can be constructed that is simultaneously consistent with local realism and QM. We show here that the BCHSH inequalities must be replaced, within the ESR model, by more general inequalities. These depend on parameters (detection probabilities) which may be such that the inequalities are never violated by quantum expectation values. The condition that no violation occurs implies the existence of upper bounds on detection probabilities, which makes the ESR model falsifiable. These results admit an intuitive explanation in terms of unfair sampling but basically differ from the seemingly similar results obtained by other approaches in which the efficiency problem is discussed in order to vindicate some kind of local realism.

•Mar 28, 2007•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•128 citations

A Proposal for a New Interpretation of Bell's Inequality Proofs

Bardo ArtificialIntelligence

Bell's inequality proofs have been interpreted as demonstrating that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local realism. However, a new interpretation has been proposed that suggests that Bell's inequalities can be reconciled with local realism if we consider causality to be a property of classical space, rather than of the quantum world, ruled by probabilities.The linear flow of time is a subjective model of causality created by the human brain resulting in subjective interpretation of time travel into the past.

•Dec 22, 2023•0 citations

Are Bell's conditions for local realism general enough?

Emilio Santos

Bell conditions for local realism are critically revisited. In particular for optical experiments I criticize Bell's proposed response of detectors to signals as extremely idealized. More physical conditions are proposed, whence a realistic local model of an optical experiment is possible which violates the Clauser-Horne (Bell) inequality. The possibility rests on the existence of a coincidence-time loophole in the experiments.

quant-pharXiv:2601.22833•The European Physical Journal Plus•Feb 2, 2026•2 citations

Local Realism versus Quantum Nonlocality

Alexander Afriat, F. Selleri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations
Most physicists uphold that the tests of the Bell-Clauser, Horne, Shimony and Holt (BCHSH) inequalities confirm quantum mechanics (QM) and refute local realism. Some scholars, however, criticize this conviction, yet maintaining that QM conflicts with local realism. At variance with both viewpoints one of the authors has recently worked out an extended semantic realism (ESR) model which shows that, if quantum probabilities are interpreted as conditional rather than absolute probabilities, a picture of the microworld can be constructed that is simultaneously consistent with local realism and QM. We show here that the BCHSH inequalities must be replaced, within the ESR model, by more general inequalities. These depend on parameters (detection probabilities) which may be such that the inequalities are never violated by quantum expectation values. The condition that no violation occurs implies the existence of upper bounds on detection probabilities, which makes the ESR model falsifiable. These results admit an intuitive explanation in terms of unfair sampling but basically differ from the seemingly similar results obtained by other approaches in which the efficiency problem is discussed in order to vindicate some kind of local realism.
Bell's inequality proofs have been interpreted as demonstrating that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local realism. However, a new interpretation has been proposed that suggests that Bell's inequalities can be reconciled with local realism if we consider causality to be a property of classical space, rather than of the quantum world, ruled by probabilities.The linear flow of time is a subjective model of causality created by the human brain resulting in subjective interpretation of time travel into the past.