Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

Experimental demonstration of Leggett-Garg inequality violations by measurements with high resolution and back-action

Yutaro Suzuki, M. Iinuma, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Published Jan 1, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities can be confirmed independent of strength of the intermediate measurement, if we take into account the measurement uncertainties of a sequential measurement. We experimentally confirm the negative joint probabilities corresponding to the Leggett-Garg inequalities violations for a wide range of measurement uncertainties using a statistical model to describe the effects of measurement resolution and back-action.

DOI
10.1063/1.4903090

Related papers

Violation of Leggett–Garg inequalities in quantum measurements with variable resolution and back-action

Yutaro Suzuki, M. Iinuma, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum mechanics violates Leggett–Garg inequalities because the operator formalism predicts correlations between different spin components that would correspond to negative joint probabilities for the outcomes of joint measurements. However, the uncertainty principle ensures that such joint measurements cannot be implemented without errors. In a sequential measurement of the spin components, the resolution and back-action errors of the intermediate measurement can be described by random spin flips acting on an intrinsic joint probability. If the error rates are known, the intrinsic joint probability can be reconstructed from the noisy statistics of the actual measurement outcomes. In this paper, we use the spin-flip model of measurement errors to analyze experimental data on photon polarization obtained with an interferometric setup that allows us to vary the measurement strength and hence the balance between resolution and back-action errors. We confirm that the intrinsic joint probability obtained from the experimental data is independent of measurement strength, and show that the same violation of the Leggett–Garg inequality can be obtained for any combination of measurement resolution and back-action.

arXiv:1206.6954•New Journal of Physics•Oct 16, 2012•97 citations

Experimental investigation of the role of measurement uncertainties in the violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities

Yutaro Suzuki, M. Iinuma, Tomonori Okazaki +3 more

We show that the violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities can be confirmed by intermediate measurements of arbitrary strength if both measurement resolution and back-action uncertainties are taken into account.

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Experimental investigation of the role of measurement uncertainties in the violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities

Yutaro Suzuki, M. Iinuma, Tomonori Okazaki +3 more

We show that the violation of Leggett-Garg inequalities can be confirmed by intermediate measurements of arbitrary strength if both measurement resolution and back-action uncertainties are taken into account.

•Aug 1, 2011•0 citations

About what can be witnessed by a Leggett—Garg inequality test: modeling its violation

Saulo V. Moreira, Arne Keller, T. Coudreau +1 more

The Leggett-Garg inequality is a widely used test of the "quantumness" of a system, and involves correlations between measurements realized at different times. According to its widespread interpretation, a violation of the Legget-Garg inequality disproves macroscopic realism and non-invasiveness. Nevertheless, recent results point out that macroscopic realism is a model dependent notion and that one should always be able to attribute to invasiveness a violation of a Legget-Garg inequality. This opens some natural questions: how to provide such an attribution in a systematic way? How can apparent macroscopic realism violation be recast into a dimensional independent invasiveness model? The present work answers these questions by introducing an operational model where the effects of invasiveness are controllable through a parameter associated with what is called the measurability of the physical system. Such a parameter leads to different generalized measurements that can be associated with the dimensionality of a system, to measurement errors or to back action.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 1, 2016•0 citations

Modeling Leggett-Garg-inequality violation

Saulo V. Moreira, Arne Keller, T. Coudreau +1 more

The Leggett-Garg inequality is a widely used test of the ``quantumness'' of a system and involves correlations between measurements realized at different times. According to its widespread interpretation, a violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality disproves macroscopic realism and noninvasiveness. Nevertheless, recent results point out that macroscopic realism is a model-dependent notion and that one should always be able to attribute to invasiveness a violation of a Leggett-Garg inequality. This opens some natural questions: How do we provide such an attribution in a systematic way? How can apparent macroscopic realism violation be recast into a dimensional-independent invasiveness model? The present work answers these questions by introducing an operational model where the effects of invasiveness are controllable through a parameter associated with what is called the measurability of the physical system. Such a parameter leads to different generalized measurements that can be associated with the dimensionality of a system, to measurement errors, or to back action.

arXiv:1506.04993•Physical Review A•Dec 30, 2015•25 citations

Violation of the Leggett–Garg inequality with weak measurements of photons

M. E. Goggin, Marcelo Pereira de Almeida, Marco Barbieri +4 more

By weakly measuring the polarization of a photon between two strong polarization measurements, we experimentally investigate the correlation between the appearance of anomalous values in quantum weak measurements and the violation of realism and nonintrusiveness of measurements. A quantitative formulation of the latter concept is expressed in terms of a Leggett-Garg inequality for the outcomes of subsequent measurements of an individual quantum system. We experimentally violate the Leggett-Garg inequality for several measurement strengths. Furthermore, we experimentally demonstrate that there is a one-to-one correlation between achieving strange weak values and violating the Leggett-Garg inequality.

arXiv:0907.1679•Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Jan 10, 2011•292 citations
The violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities can be confirmed independent of strength of the intermediate measurement, if we take into account the measurement uncertainties of a sequential measurement. We experimentally confirm the negative joint probabilities corresponding to the Leggett-Garg inequalities violations for a wide range of measurement uncertainties using a statistical model to describe the effects of measurement resolution and back-action.
Quantum mechanics violates Leggett–Garg inequalities because the operator formalism predicts correlations between different spin components that would correspond to negative joint probabilities for the outcomes of joint measurements. However, the uncertainty principle ensures that such joint measurements cannot be implemented without errors. In a sequential measurement of the spin components, the resolution and back-action errors of the intermediate measurement can be described by random spin flips acting on an intrinsic joint probability. If the error rates are known, the intrinsic joint probability can be reconstructed from the noisy statistics of the actual measurement outcomes. In this paper, we use the spin-flip model of measurement errors to analyze experimental data on photon polarization obtained with an interferometric setup that allows us to vary the measurement strength and hence the balance between resolution and back-action errors. We confirm that the intrinsic joint probability obtained from the experimental data is independent of measurement strength, and show that the same violation of the Leggett–Garg inequality can be obtained for any combination of measurement resolution and back-action.
The Leggett-Garg inequality is a widely used test of the "quantumness" of a system, and involves correlations between measurements realized at different times. According to its widespread interpretation, a violation of the Legget-Garg inequality disproves macroscopic realism and non-invasiveness. Nevertheless, recent results point out that macroscopic realism is a model dependent notion and that one should always be able to attribute to invasiveness a violation of a Legget-Garg inequality. This opens some natural questions: how to provide such an attribution in a systematic way? How can apparent macroscopic realism violation be recast into a dimensional independent invasiveness model? The present work answers these questions by introducing an operational model where the effects of invasiveness are controllable through a parameter associated with what is called the measurability of the physical system. Such a parameter leads to different generalized measurements that can be associated with the dimensionality of a system, to measurement errors or to back action.
The Leggett-Garg inequality is a widely used test of the ``quantumness'' of a system and involves correlations between measurements realized at different times. According to its widespread interpretation, a violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality disproves macroscopic realism and noninvasiveness. Nevertheless, recent results point out that macroscopic realism is a model-dependent notion and that one should always be able to attribute to invasiveness a violation of a Leggett-Garg inequality. This opens some natural questions: How do we provide such an attribution in a systematic way? How can apparent macroscopic realism violation be recast into a dimensional-independent invasiveness model? The present work answers these questions by introducing an operational model where the effects of invasiveness are controllable through a parameter associated with what is called the measurability of the physical system. Such a parameter leads to different generalized measurements that can be associated with the dimensionality of a system, to measurement errors, or to back action.
By weakly measuring the polarization of a photon between two strong polarization measurements, we experimentally investigate the correlation between the appearance of anomalous values in quantum weak measurements and the violation of realism and nonintrusiveness of measurements. A quantitative formulation of the latter concept is expressed in terms of a Leggett-Garg inequality for the outcomes of subsequent measurements of an individual quantum system. We experimentally violate the Leggett-Garg inequality for several measurement strengths. Furthermore, we experimentally demonstrate that there is a one-to-one correlation between achieving strange weak values and violating the Leggett-Garg inequality.