Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

On the Gibbs paradox: what does indistinguishability really mean?

Arthur M. Lesk

Published Apr 1, 1980• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Gibbs paradox concerns the entropy of mixing of ideal gases: although the entropy change of mixing samples of different gases is unequal to the entropy change of mixing samples of the same gas, it is not clear within the framework of classical thermodynamics how the identity of the particles effects the analysis. An explicit examination of the concept of indistinguishability can clarify some of the implications of the quantum-mechanical resolution of the Gibbs paradox.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/13/4/008

Related papers

Comment on “The Gibbs paradox and the distinguishability of identical particles,” by M. A. M. Versteegh and D. Dieks [Am. J. Phys. 79, 741–746 (2011)]

David S. Corti

We revisit recent discussions concerning the Gibbs paradox—the apparent discrepancy between the entropy change upon mixing identical gases as evaluated from the statistical mechanics of classical distinguishable particles and macroscopic thermodynamics. Contrary to what is often stated, we show that thermodynamics does not require this entropy of mixing to be zero. A zero value follows from the implicit assumption that the identical gas particles are indistinguishable. If the identical particles are explicitly assumed to be distinguishable, thermodynamics yields the same entropy of mixing as classical statistical mechanics.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 20, 2012•8 citations

The Gibbs paradox and the physical criteria for indistinguishability of identical particles

C. S. Unnikrishnan

Gibbs paradox in the context of statistical mechanics addresses the issue of additivity of entropy of mixing gases. The usual discussion attributes the paradoxical situation to classical distinguishability of identical particles and credits quantum theory for enabling indistinguishability of identical particles to solve the problem. We argue that indistinguishability of identical particles is already a feature in classical mechanics and this is clearly brought out when the problem is treated in the language of information and associated entropy. We pinpoint the physical criteria for indistinguishability that is crucial for the treatment of the Gibbs’ problem and the consistency of its solution with conventional thermodynamics. Quantum mechanics provides a quantitative criterion, not possible in the classical picture, for the degree of indistinguishability in terms of visibility of quantum interference, or overlap of the states as pointed out by von Neumann, thereby endowing the entropy expression with mathematical continuity and physical reasonableness.

arXiv:1811.03967•International Journal of Quantum Information•Aug 18, 2016•1 citation

Explanation of the Gibbs paradox within the framework of quantum thermodynamics

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

The issue of the Gibbs paradox is that when considering mixing of two gases within classical thermodynamics, the entropy of mixing appears to be a discontinuous function of the difference between the gases: it is finite for whatever small difference, but vanishes for identical gases. The resolution offered in the literature, with help of quantum mixing entropy, was later shown to be unsatisfactory precisely where it sought to resolve the paradox. Macroscopic thermodynamics, classical or quantum, is unsuitable for explaining the paradox, since it does not deal explicitly with the difference between the gases. The proper approach employs quantum thermodynamics, which deals with finite quantum systems coupled to a large bath and a macroscopic work source. Within quantum thermodynamics, entropy generally loses its dominant place and the target of the paradox is naturally shifted to a decrease of the maximally available work before and after mixing (mixing ergotropy). In contrast to entropy this is an unambiguous quantity. For almost identical gases the mixing ergotropy continuously goes to zero, thus resolving the paradox. In this approach the concept of "difference between the gases" gets a clear operational meaning related to the possibilities of controlling the involved quantum states. Difficulties which prevent resolutions of the paradox in its entropic formulation do not arise here. The mixing ergotropy has several counterintuitive features. It can increase when less precise operations are allowed. In the quantum situation (in contrast to the classical one) the mixing ergotropy can also increase when decreasing the degree of mixing between the gases or when decreasing their distinguishability. These points go against a direct association of physical irreversibility with lack of information.

arXiv:quant-ph/0507145•Physical Review E•Jun 14, 2006•26 citations

The Gibbs Paradox: Lessons from Thermodynamics

Janneke van Lith

The Gibbs paradox in statistical mechanics is often taken to indicate that already in the classical domain particles should be treated as fundamentally indistinguishable. This paper shows, on the contrary, how one can recover the thermodynamical account of the entropy of mixing, while treating states that only differ by permutations of similar particles as distinct. By reference to the orthodox theory of thermodynamics, it is argued that entropy differences are only meaningful if they are related to reversible processes connecting the initial and final state. For mixing processes, this means that processes should be considered in which particle number is allowed to vary. Within the context of statistical mechanics, the Gibbsian grandcanonical ensemble is a suitable device for describing such processes. It is shown how the grandcanonical entropy relates in the appropriate way to changes of other thermodynamical quantities in reversible processes, and how the thermodynamical account of the entropy of mixing is recovered even when treating the particles as distinguishable.

Entropy•Apr 30, 2018•8 citations

The Gibbs Paradox. About the paradox and the indistinguishability of identical particles

S.C. van Berkum

The Gibbs Paradox is an important question in thermodynamics. In this thesis I search for a solution for the paradox from a classical, philosophical and quantum mechanical point of view. A common way to solve the Gibbs Paradox is by using the reduced entropy. However, this definition of entropy should not be interpreted as an argument for the indistinguishability of identical particles, because all other particles which have unique trajectories through space-time are distinguishable in principle. The Gibbs paradox could be solved in a few ways, but each solution has certain constrains.

•May 26, 2014•0 citations

Yet another resolution of the Gibbs paradox: an information theory approach

Chih‐Yuan Tseng

The “Gibbs Paradox” refers to several related questions concerning entropy in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics: whether it is an extensive quantity or not, how it changes when identical particles are mixed, and the proper way to count states in systems of identical particles. Several authors have recognized that the paradox is resolved once it is realized that there is no such thing as the entropy of a system, that there are many entropies, and that the choice between treating particles as being distinguishable or not depends on the resolution of the experiment. The purpose of this note is essentially pedagogical; we add to their analysis by examining the paradox from the point of view of information theory. Our argument is based on that ‘grouping’ property of entropy that Shannon recognized, by including it among his axioms, as an essential requirement on any measure of information. Not only does it provide the right connection between different entropies but, in addition, it draws our attention to the obvious fact that addressing issues of distinguishability and of counting states requires a clear idea about what precisely do we mean by a state.

arXiv:cond-mat/0109324•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2002•18 citations
The Gibbs paradox concerns the entropy of mixing of ideal gases: although the entropy change of mixing samples of different gases is unequal to the entropy change of mixing samples of the same gas, it is not clear within the framework of classical thermodynamics how the identity of the particles effects the analysis. An explicit examination of the concept of indistinguishability can clarify some of the implications of the quantum-mechanical resolution of the Gibbs paradox.
We revisit recent discussions concerning the Gibbs paradox—the apparent discrepancy between the entropy change upon mixing identical gases as evaluated from the statistical mechanics of classical distinguishable particles and macroscopic thermodynamics. Contrary to what is often stated, we show that thermodynamics does not require this entropy of mixing to be zero. A zero value follows from the implicit assumption that the identical gas particles are indistinguishable. If the identical particles are explicitly assumed to be distinguishable, thermodynamics yields the same entropy of mixing as classical statistical mechanics.
Gibbs paradox in the context of statistical mechanics addresses the issue of additivity of entropy of mixing gases. The usual discussion attributes the paradoxical situation to classical distinguishability of identical particles and credits quantum theory for enabling indistinguishability of identical particles to solve the problem. We argue that indistinguishability of identical particles is already a feature in classical mechanics and this is clearly brought out when the problem is treated in the language of information and associated entropy. We pinpoint the physical criteria for indistinguishability that is crucial for the treatment of the Gibbs’ problem and the consistency of its solution with conventional thermodynamics. Quantum mechanics provides a quantitative criterion, not possible in the classical picture, for the degree of indistinguishability in terms of visibility of quantum interference, or overlap of the states as pointed out by von Neumann, thereby endowing the entropy expression with mathematical continuity and physical reasonableness.
The issue of the Gibbs paradox is that when considering mixing of two gases within classical thermodynamics, the entropy of mixing appears to be a discontinuous function of the difference between the gases: it is finite for whatever small difference, but vanishes for identical gases. The resolution offered in the literature, with help of quantum mixing entropy, was later shown to be unsatisfactory precisely where it sought to resolve the paradox. Macroscopic thermodynamics, classical or quantum, is unsuitable for explaining the paradox, since it does not deal explicitly with the difference between the gases. The proper approach employs quantum thermodynamics, which deals with finite quantum systems coupled to a large bath and a macroscopic work source. Within quantum thermodynamics, entropy generally loses its dominant place and the target of the paradox is naturally shifted to a decrease of the maximally available work before and after mixing (mixing ergotropy). In contrast to entropy this is an unambiguous quantity. For almost identical gases the mixing ergotropy continuously goes to zero, thus resolving the paradox. In this approach the concept of "difference between the gases" gets a clear operational meaning related to the possibilities of controlling the involved quantum states. Difficulties which prevent resolutions of the paradox in its entropic formulation do not arise here. The mixing ergotropy has several counterintuitive features. It can increase when less precise operations are allowed. In the quantum situation (in contrast to the classical one) the mixing ergotropy can also increase when decreasing the degree of mixing between the gases or when decreasing their distinguishability. These points go against a direct association of physical irreversibility with lack of information.
The Gibbs paradox in statistical mechanics is often taken to indicate that already in the classical domain particles should be treated as fundamentally indistinguishable. This paper shows, on the contrary, how one can recover the thermodynamical account of the entropy of mixing, while treating states that only differ by permutations of similar particles as distinct. By reference to the orthodox theory of thermodynamics, it is argued that entropy differences are only meaningful if they are related to reversible processes connecting the initial and final state. For mixing processes, this means that processes should be considered in which particle number is allowed to vary. Within the context of statistical mechanics, the Gibbsian grandcanonical ensemble is a suitable device for describing such processes. It is shown how the grandcanonical entropy relates in the appropriate way to changes of other thermodynamical quantities in reversible processes, and how the thermodynamical account of the entropy of mixing is recovered even when treating the particles as distinguishable.
The Gibbs Paradox is an important question in thermodynamics. In this thesis I search for a solution for the paradox from a classical, philosophical and quantum mechanical point of view. A common way to solve the Gibbs Paradox is by using the reduced entropy. However, this definition of entropy should not be interpreted as an argument for the indistinguishability of identical particles, because all other particles which have unique trajectories through space-time are distinguishable in principle. The Gibbs paradox could be solved in a few ways, but each solution has certain constrains.
The “Gibbs Paradox” refers to several related questions concerning entropy in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics: whether it is an extensive quantity or not, how it changes when identical particles are mixed, and the proper way to count states in systems of identical particles. Several authors have recognized that the paradox is resolved once it is realized that there is no such thing as the entropy of a system, that there are many entropies, and that the choice between treating particles as being distinguishable or not depends on the resolution of the experiment. The purpose of this note is essentially pedagogical; we add to their analysis by examining the paradox from the point of view of information theory. Our argument is based on that ‘grouping’ property of entropy that Shannon recognized, by including it among his axioms, as an essential requirement on any measure of information. Not only does it provide the right connection between different entropies but, in addition, it draws our attention to the obvious fact that addressing issues of distinguishability and of counting states requires a clear idea about what precisely do we mean by a state.