Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields

Zitterbewegung and the internal geometry of the electron

A. O. Barut, Anthony J. Bracken

Published May 15, 1981• 280 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Schr\"odinger's work on the Zitterbewegung of the free electron is reexamined. His proposed "microscopic momentum" vector for the Zitterbewegung is rejected in favor of a "relative momentum" vector, with the value $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{P}}=mc\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}$ in the rest frame of the center of mass. His oscillatory "microscopic coordinate" vector is retained. In the rest frame, it takes the form $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{Q}}=\ensuremath{-}i(\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}}{2mc})\ensuremath{\beta}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}$, and the Zitterbewegung is described in this frame in terms of $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{P}}$, $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{Q}}$, and the Hamiltonian $m{c}^{2}\ensuremath{\beta}$, as a finite three-dimensional harmonic oscillator with a compact phase space. The Lie algebra generated by $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{Q}}$ and $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{P}}$ is that of SO(5), and in particular $[{Q}_{i},{P}_{j}]=\ensuremath{-}i\ensuremath{\hbar}{\ensuremath{\delta}}_{\mathrm{ij}}\ensuremath{\beta}$. It is argued that the simplest possible finite, three-dimensional, isotropic, quantum-mechanical system requires such an SO(5) structure, incorporates a fundamental length, and has harmonic-oscillator dynamics. Dirac's equation is derived as the wave equation appropriate to the description of such a finite quantum system in an arbitrary moving frame of reference, using a dynamical group SO(3,2) which can be extended to SO(4,2). Spin appears here as the orbital angular momentum associated with the internal system, and rest-mass energy appears as the internal energy in the rest frame. Possible generalizations of these ideas are indicated, in particular those involving higher-dimensional representations of SO(5).

DOI
10.1103/physrevd.23.2454

Related papers

Measuring Zitterbewegung predicted by the Dirac equation for a free electron

James H. Wilson

The fact that the Dirac equation predicts Zitterbewegung (ZBW) for a free electron is well known from Schrodinger [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] from the very early days of Dirac's relativistic quantum theory. Schrodingerdescribed ZBW qualitatively as a persistent interference between positive and negative energy states, and the objective of this and previous papers by this author [Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] is to describe ways to measure the presence or absence ofZBW for a free (or nearly free) electron. If ZBW measurements show that it is not present for a free electron, then the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger's analysis [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] are inaccurate. If ZBW ispresent as Schrodinger's analysis [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] of the Dirac Equation asserts, then a description of a free electron emerges that is significantly different than the present very small, static point electronwith “intrinsic” properties of spin and magnetic moment accepted by most physicists [Eides et al., Phys. Reports 342, 63 (2001).] today. This paper develops a quantitative theory of the free electron directly from the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger's analyses[E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] without any other assumptions. The fact that ZBW exists for the electron in the hydrogen atom is confirmed by the Darwin term [J. J. Sakurai, Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley,Reading, MA, 1967)]. It seems unnatural to the author that ZBW would vanish when the electron is removed from the hydrogen atom, and becomes free. The unanswered question is whether ZBW can be confirmed or refuted by measurement for a free electron, and possible ways to measure its presenceor absence are described in this paper. The remainder of the paper describes the free electron, assuming ZBW exists. The Dirac Equation [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] produces a physical description of a free electron's ZBW as rapidly oscillating,quantized Center of Charge (CoC) point rotating about a fictitious Center of Mass (CoM) at a radius of 3/ 2 times the electron's Compton wavelength. The results in the remainder of this paper, as well as Schrodinger's analyses [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)24, 418 (1930).], are only true if ZBW can be confirmed by measurement. In case measurements show no ZBW exists for a free electron, the Dirac Equation is not a correct description of a single free electron, and more serious problems arise. The static point like electron deduced fromscattering experiments [Eides et al., Phys. Rep. 342, 63 (2001)] that give estimates of the free electron's internal structure based on far field measurements can be misleading in estimating the free electron's internal structure. In Classical Electrodynamics, when one observesthe electric field from a point electron and from a sphere with the same charge spread uniformly over its surface from the far field, Gauss' Law shows that the electric fields are identical. When one tries to “observe” or “measure” the free electron's internal structurewith the high-energy photons required, the single particle free electron is completely destroyed by the measurement process. In fact, any attempt to observe or measure a free electron's structure ensures that the electron is no longer a totally free single particle, and one must be carefulto use only elastic observation methods [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] for this very difficult measurement. Observing a free Quark, much less its internal structure, has proven very difficult, if not impossible.

Physics Essays•Mar 13, 2018•7 citations

Exact Solutions of the Heisenberg Equations and Zitterbewegung of the Electron in a Constant Uniform Magnetic Field

A. O. Barut, Anthony J. Bracken

For a free Dirac electron, the Heisenberg equations define an internal dynamical system in the rest frame, isomorphic to a finite three-dimensional oscillator with a compact SO(5) phase space, such that the spin of the electron is the orbital angular momentum of the internal dynamics (Barut and Bracken 1980, 1981a). In the present work, the change in this internal dynamics due to an external magnetic field is studied. In order that the internal motion can be distinguished from the centre of mass motion, the solutions of the corresponding Hamilton and Heisenberg equations for the relativistic classical motion and the relativistic quantum mechanical spinless motion are also presented. The solutions for the electron exhibit the effect of the spin terms both in the internal motion and external motion, and we are able to identify the properties of the Zitterbewegung in the external field.

Australian Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1982•12 citations

Electron structure through a classical description of theZitterbewegung

B. F. Rizzuti, Éverton M. C. Abreu, Péricles V. Alves

The description of the Zitterbewegung at a classical level indicates possible predictions of the electron quantum properties even before quantization: this quivering motion is restricted to a plane, which leads us to only two possible orientations of the corresponding angular momentum, even in the absence of a quantized theory or external fields. Besides, the angular momentum associated with the Zitterbewegung turns out to be proportional to $\ensuremath{\hbar}$. Namely, using a standard constraint analysis we have proven this last result. Thus, assuming that this is an observable phenomenon, we recognize this oscillatory motion as a classical signature of the spin of the electron. We also propose here an interpretation of the Zitterbewegung based on geometrical grounds: it can be seen as the physical degrees of freedom of position variables constrained to a sphere, which enforces the hypothesis of assuming an electron internal structure.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jul 24, 2014•6 citations

Compact quantum systems: Internal geometry of relativistic systems

A. O. Barut, Anthony J. Bracken

A generalization is presented of the kinematical algebra so(5), shown previously to be relevant for the description of the internal dynamics (Zitterbewegung) of Dirac’s electron. The algebra so(n+2) is proposed for the case of a compact quantum system with n degrees of freedom. Associated wave equations follow from boosting these compact quantum systems. There exists a contraction to the kinematical algebra of a system with n degrees of freedom of the usual type, by which the commutation relations between n coordinate operators Qi and corresponding momentum operators Pi, occurring within the so(n+2) algebra, go over into the usual canonical commutation relations. The so(n+2) algebra is contrasted with the sl(l,n) superalgebra introduced recently by Palev in a similar context: because so(n+2) has spinor representations, its use allows the possibility of interpreting the half-integral spin in terms of the angular momentum of internal finite quantum systems. Connection is made with the ideas of Weyl on the possible use in quantum mechanics of ray representation of finite Abelian groups, and so also with other recent works on finite quantum systems. Possible directions of future research are indicated.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1985•13 citations

Zitterbewegung revisited

G C Sherry

Certain inconsistencies in the derivation of the zitterbewegung in Dirac's theory of the free electron are discussed.

European Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1988•3 citations

On the Zitterbewegung of the relativistic electron

A. O. Barut, M G Cruz

Certain 'inconsistencies' in the derivation of the Zitterbewegung solution for Heisenberg equations for the Dirac electron, reported by Sherry (see ibid., vol.9, p.301-2 (1988)) are shown to be incorrect.

European Journal of Physics•May 1, 1994•1 citation
Schr"odinger's work on the Zitterbewegung of the free electron is reexamined. His proposed "microscopic momentum" vector for the Zitterbewegung is rejected in favor of a "relative momentum" vector, with the value P\ensuremath→=mc\ensuremathα\ensuremath→\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{P}}=mc\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}P\ensuremath→​=mc\ensuremathα\ensuremath→​ in the rest frame of the center of mass. His oscillatory "microscopic coordinate" vector is retained. In the rest frame, it takes the form Q\ensuremath→=\ensuremath−i(\ensuremathℏ2mc)\ensuremathβ\ensuremathα\ensuremath→\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{Q}}=\ensuremath{-}i(\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}}{2mc})\ensuremath{\beta}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}Q\ensuremath→​=\ensuremath−i(2mc\ensuremathℏ​)\ensuremathβ\ensuremathα\ensuremath→​, and the Zitterbewegung is described in this frame in terms of P\ensuremath→\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{P}}P\ensuremath→​, Q\ensuremath→\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{Q}}Q\ensuremath→​, and the Hamiltonian mc2\ensuremathβm{c}^{2}\ensuremath{\beta}mc2\ensuremathβ, as a finite three-dimensional harmonic oscillator with a compact phase space. The Lie algebra generated by Q\ensuremath→\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{Q}}Q\ensuremath→​ and P\ensuremath→\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\mathrm{P}}P\ensuremath→​ is that of SO(5), and in particular [Qi,Pj]=\ensuremath−i\ensuremathℏ\ensuremathδij\ensuremathβ[{Q}_{i},{P}_{j}]=\ensuremath{-}i\ensuremath{\hbar}{\ensuremath{\delta}}_{\mathrm{ij}}\ensuremath{\beta}[Qi​,Pj​]=\ensuremath−i\ensuremathℏ\ensuremathδij​\ensuremathβ. It is argued that the simplest possible finite, three-dimensional, isotropic, quantum-mechanical system requires such an SO(5) structure, incorporates a fundamental length, and has harmonic-oscillator dynamics. Dirac's equation is derived as the wave equation appropriate to the description of such a finite quantum system in an arbitrary moving frame of reference, using a dynamical group SO(3,2) which can be extended to SO(4,2). Spin appears here as the orbital angular momentum associated with the internal system, and rest-mass energy appears as the internal energy in the rest frame. Possible generalizations of these ideas are indicated, in particular those involving higher-dimensional representations of SO(5).
The fact that the Dirac equation predicts Zitterbewegung (ZBW) for a free electron is well known from Schrodinger [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] from the very early days of Dirac's relativistic quantum theory. Schrodingerdescribed ZBW qualitatively as a persistent interference between positive and negative energy states, and the objective of this and previous papers by this author [Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] is to describe ways to measure the presence or absence ofZBW for a free (or nearly free) electron. If ZBW measurements show that it is not present for a free electron, then the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger's analysis [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] are inaccurate. If ZBW ispresent as Schrodinger's analysis [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] of the Dirac Equation asserts, then a description of a free electron emerges that is significantly different than the present very small, static point electronwith “intrinsic” properties of spin and magnetic moment accepted by most physicists [Eides et al., Phys. Reports 342, 63 (2001).] today. This paper develops a quantitative theory of the free electron directly from the Dirac Equation and Schrodinger's analyses[E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 24, 418 (1930)] without any other assumptions. The fact that ZBW exists for the electron in the hydrogen atom is confirmed by the Darwin term [J. J. Sakurai, Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley,Reading, MA, 1967)]. It seems unnatural to the author that ZBW would vanish when the electron is removed from the hydrogen atom, and becomes free. The unanswered question is whether ZBW can be confirmed or refuted by measurement for a free electron, and possible ways to measure its presenceor absence are described in this paper. The remainder of the paper describes the free electron, assuming ZBW exists. The Dirac Equation [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] produces a physical description of a free electron's ZBW as rapidly oscillating,quantized Center of Charge (CoC) point rotating about a fictitious Center of Mass (CoM) at a radius of 3/ 2 times the electron's Compton wavelength. The results in the remainder of this paper, as well as Schrodinger's analyses [E. Schrodinger, Sitzungsber Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)24, 418 (1930).], are only true if ZBW can be confirmed by measurement. In case measurements show no ZBW exists for a free electron, the Dirac Equation is not a correct description of a single free electron, and more serious problems arise. The static point like electron deduced fromscattering experiments [Eides et al., Phys. Rep. 342, 63 (2001)] that give estimates of the free electron's internal structure based on far field measurements can be misleading in estimating the free electron's internal structure. In Classical Electrodynamics, when one observesthe electric field from a point electron and from a sphere with the same charge spread uniformly over its surface from the far field, Gauss' Law shows that the electric fields are identical. When one tries to “observe” or “measure” the free electron's internal structurewith the high-energy photons required, the single particle free electron is completely destroyed by the measurement process. In fact, any attempt to observe or measure a free electron's structure ensures that the electron is no longer a totally free single particle, and one must be carefulto use only elastic observation methods [J. H. Wilson, Phys. Essays 28, 1 (2015); Phys. Essays 29, 402 (2016)] for this very difficult measurement. Observing a free Quark, much less its internal structure, has proven very difficult, if not impossible.
For a free Dirac electron, the Heisenberg equations define an internal dynamical system in the rest frame, isomorphic to a finite three-dimensional oscillator with a compact SO(5) phase space, such that the spin of the electron is the orbital angular momentum of the internal dynamics (Barut and Bracken 1980, 1981a). In the present work, the change in this internal dynamics due to an external magnetic field is studied. In order that the internal motion can be distinguished from the centre of mass motion, the solutions of the corresponding Hamilton and Heisenberg equations for the relativistic classical motion and the relativistic quantum mechanical spinless motion are also presented. The solutions for the electron exhibit the effect of the spin terms both in the internal motion and external motion, and we are able to identify the properties of the Zitterbewegung in the external field.
The description of the Zitterbewegung at a classical level indicates possible predictions of the electron quantum properties even before quantization: this quivering motion is restricted to a plane, which leads us to only two possible orientations of the corresponding angular momentum, even in the absence of a quantized theory or external fields. Besides, the angular momentum associated with the Zitterbewegung turns out to be proportional to $\ensuremath{\hbar}$. Namely, using a standard constraint analysis we have proven this last result. Thus, assuming that this is an observable phenomenon, we recognize this oscillatory motion as a classical signature of the spin of the electron. We also propose here an interpretation of the Zitterbewegung based on geometrical grounds: it can be seen as the physical degrees of freedom of position variables constrained to a sphere, which enforces the hypothesis of assuming an electron internal structure.
A generalization is presented of the kinematical algebra so(5), shown previously to be relevant for the description of the internal dynamics (Zitterbewegung) of Dirac’s electron. The algebra so(n+2) is proposed for the case of a compact quantum system with n degrees of freedom. Associated wave equations follow from boosting these compact quantum systems. There exists a contraction to the kinematical algebra of a system with n degrees of freedom of the usual type, by which the commutation relations between n coordinate operators Qi and corresponding momentum operators Pi, occurring within the so(n+2) algebra, go over into the usual canonical commutation relations. The so(n+2) algebra is contrasted with the sl(l,n) superalgebra introduced recently by Palev in a similar context: because so(n+2) has spinor representations, its use allows the possibility of interpreting the half-integral spin in terms of the angular momentum of internal finite quantum systems. Connection is made with the ideas of Weyl on the possible use in quantum mechanics of ray representation of finite Abelian groups, and so also with other recent works on finite quantum systems. Possible directions of future research are indicated.