Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Physics Teacher

Experiment and the nature of quantum reality

Thomas M. Corwin, Dale Wachowiak

Published Oct 1, 1984• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.2341606

Related papers

Nature of Reality: Physical, Metaphysical and Mystical Aspects

Hardev Singh Virk

Nature of Reality has been subject of investigations since historical times both in science and religion. The physical interpretation of Reality has experienced a dynamic change from Aristotle to Einstein. Relativity theory and Quantum mechanics have led to formulations of new concepts regarding space, time, matter and reality. Uncertainty Principle by Heisenberg and the concept of dual nature of matter and radiation by Louis de Broglie gave a serious blow to the philosophy of determinism based on Newtonian Mechanics and Cartesian world view. The great debates between Einstein and Bohr at Solvay Conferences about the inadequacy of quantum mechanics to describe physical aspect of Reality are a part of history of science now. EPR paradox and Bell’s theorem have introduced the idea of connectedness and consciousness in Quantum Reality. Experience is the ultimate test of truth or Reality for the Indian philosopher. The Reality is trans-empirical, hence, it cannot be known through sense experience in the way in which empirical/scientific knowledge is gained. Reality is better understood or comprehended through intuitive experience for it transcends both the rational and the sensory aspects of human experience. Keywords: Reality, Newtonian World view, Copenhagen Interpretation, Uncertainty Principle, EPR Paradox, Metaphysics, Mysticism Cite this Article Hardev Singh Virk. Nature of Reality: Physical, Metaphysical and Mystical Aspects. Omniscience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal (OSMJ). 2015; 5(2): 10–15p.

OmniScience A Multi-disciplinary Journal•Aug 10, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Theory and Reality

Bunge, Mario

Studies in the foundations methodology and philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1967•141 citations

Reality and the Quantum Theory

Alain Aspect, Trevor W. Marshall, Emilio Santos +10 more

Physics Today•Nov 1, 1985•2 citations

On the Probabilistic Nature of Observable Phenomena

Muhammad Zahid Ali

This paper proposes a Gadenkan experiment named “Observer’s Dilemma”, to investigate the probabilistic nature of observable phenomena. It has been reasoned that probabilistic nature in, otherwise uniquely deterministic phenomena can be introduced due to lack of information of underlying governing laws. Through theoretical consequences of the experiment, concepts of ‘Absolute Complete’ and ‘Observably Complete” theories have been introduced. Furthermore, nature of reality being ‘absolute’ and ‘observable’ have been discussed along with the possibility of multiple realities being true for observer. In addition, certain aspects of quantum mechanics have been interpreted. It has been argued that quantum mechanics is an ‘observably complete’ theory and its nature is to give probabilistic predictions. Lastly, it has been argued that “Everettian - Many world” interpretation of quantum mechanics is very real and true in the framework of ‘observable nature of reality’, for humans

•Jan 1, 2019•2 citations

Is the Double Slit Experiment about the Nature of Reality or the Nature of Perception?

Ken Levi

The famous Double Slit Experiment (DSE) changed our concept of reality. It led to the view that the basic building blocks of matter and energy can take the form of either waves or particles, and what makes the difference is whether or not they are observed. As Niels Bohr concluded, “Until we’re conscious of something, it doesn’t exist.” A new theory of consciousness, however, suggests a different interpretation of the DSE results. The theory of the Holographic Mind (HM) contains many of the same elements as the DSE. In particular, the HM describes how observation converts wave patterns into 3D images. This suggests that the same DSE dynamics which led researchers to upend our notion of reality, might be less about the nature of reality, than about how we derive information about reality; that is, the nature of perception.

Journal of consciousness exploration & research•Jul 9, 2022•0 citations

Reality and Quantum Theory

Oreste Piccioni, Werner A. W. Mehlhop

Physics Today•Apr 1, 1986•0 citations
Nature of Reality has been subject of investigations since historical times both in science and religion. The physical interpretation of Reality has experienced a dynamic change from Aristotle to Einstein. Relativity theory and Quantum mechanics have led to formulations of new concepts regarding space, time, matter and reality. Uncertainty Principle by Heisenberg and the concept of dual nature of matter and radiation by Louis de Broglie gave a serious blow to the philosophy of determinism based on Newtonian Mechanics and Cartesian world view. The great debates between Einstein and Bohr at Solvay Conferences about the inadequacy of quantum mechanics to describe physical aspect of Reality are a part of history of science now. EPR paradox and Bell’s theorem have introduced the idea of connectedness and consciousness in Quantum Reality. Experience is the ultimate test of truth or Reality for the Indian philosopher. The Reality is trans-empirical, hence, it cannot be known through sense experience in the way in which empirical/scientific knowledge is gained. Reality is better understood or comprehended through intuitive experience for it transcends both the rational and the sensory aspects of human experience. Keywords: Reality, Newtonian World view, Copenhagen Interpretation, Uncertainty Principle, EPR Paradox, Metaphysics, Mysticism Cite this Article Hardev Singh Virk. Nature of Reality: Physical, Metaphysical and Mystical Aspects. Omniscience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal (OSMJ). 2015; 5(2): 10–15p.
This paper proposes a Gadenkan experiment named “Observer’s Dilemma”, to investigate the probabilistic nature of observable phenomena. It has been reasoned that probabilistic nature in, otherwise uniquely deterministic phenomena can be introduced due to lack of information of underlying governing laws. Through theoretical consequences of the experiment, concepts of ‘Absolute Complete’ and ‘Observably Complete” theories have been introduced. Furthermore, nature of reality being ‘absolute’ and ‘observable’ have been discussed along with the possibility of multiple realities being true for observer. In addition, certain aspects of quantum mechanics have been interpreted. It has been argued that quantum mechanics is an ‘observably complete’ theory and its nature is to give probabilistic predictions. Lastly, it has been argued that “Everettian - Many world” interpretation of quantum mechanics is very real and true in the framework of ‘observable nature of reality’, for humans
The famous Double Slit Experiment (DSE) changed our concept of reality. It led to the view that the basic building blocks of matter and energy can take the form of either waves or particles, and what makes the difference is whether or not they are observed. As Niels Bohr concluded, “Until we’re conscious of something, it doesn’t exist.” A new theory of consciousness, however, suggests a different interpretation of the DSE results. The theory of the Holographic Mind (HM) contains many of the same elements as the DSE. In particular, the HM describes how observation converts wave patterns into 3D images. This suggests that the same DSE dynamics which led researchers to upend our notion of reality, might be less about the nature of reality, than about how we derive information about reality; that is, the nature of perception.