Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on ‘‘Fermi surface and dynamics oft-Jmodel at moderate doping’’

R. Eder, Y. Ohta

Published Apr 25, 1994• 16 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by W. Stephan and P. Horsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2258 (1991).Received 4 October 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2816©1994 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.72.2816

Related papers

Comment on ‘‘Faraday rotation and the Hall constant in strongly correlated Fermi systems’’

R.S. Markiewicz

A Comment on the Letter by B. S. Shastry et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2004 (1993).Received 5 May 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2837©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 25, 1993•1 citation

Comment on “Faraday Rotation and the Hall Constant in Strongly Correlated Fermi Systems”

Adriana Moreo, Alberto G. Rojo

A Comment on the Letter by B. Sriram Shastry, Boris I. Shraiman and Rajiv R. P. Singh Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2004 (1993).Received 27 July 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3085©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 10, 1995•1 citation

Is there a breakdown of Fermi-liquid behavior in the two-dimensional Fermi gas?

Jan R. Engelbrecht, Mohit Randeria

A Comment on the Letter by Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2306 (1990).Received 11 December 1990DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3225©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jun 17, 1991•36 citations

Comment on “Reduced Dynamics Need Not Be Completely Positive”

Robert Alicki

A Comment on the Letter by Philip Pechukau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1060 (1994). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 24 October 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3020©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 16, 1995•190 citations

Comment on ‘‘Electronic model for superconductivity’’

Claudio Castellani, C. Di Castro, M. Grilli

A Comment on the Letter by F. H. L. Essler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 73 (1993).Received 17 January 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3626©1994 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 30, 1994•5 citations

Comment on ‘‘Low-temperature expansion for the Ising model’’

Anthony John Guttmann, Ian Graham Enting

A Comment on the Letter by G. Bhanot, M. Crentz, and J. Lacki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1841 (1992).Received 23 October 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.698©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 1, 1993•7 citations
A Comment on the Letter by W. Stephan and P. Horsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2258 (1991).Received 4 October 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2816©1994 American Physical Society