Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Foundations of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Mark Goodall

Published Jul 1, 1962• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/195167a0

Related papers

Foundations of quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory

L. S. F. Olavo

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jan 1, 1999•40 citations

A Structurally Relativistic Quantum Theory. Part 1: Foundations

Emile Grgin

The apparent impossibility of extending non-relativistic quantum mechanics to a relativistic quantum theory is shown to be due to the insufficient structural richness of the field of complex numbers over which quantum mechanics is built. A new number system with the properties needed to support an inherently relativistic quantum theory is brought to light and investigated to a point sufficient for applications.

arXiv:1204.3562•Apr 16, 2012•0 citations

Introduction to relativistic quantum mechanics

Konstantin K. Likharev

Institute of Physics eBooks•May 1, 2019•8 citations

Introduction to relativistic quantum mechanics

Tommy Ohlsson B

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 22, 2011•3 citations

Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Revealed by the Conservation Laws

Richard Joseph Oldani

It is often claimed that Einstein is wrong about quantum mechanics. However, when comparisons are made with respect to theoretical foundations rather than experimental results Einstein’s theories are found to be superior. Because he did not complete his own quantum theory its far-reaching, intuitively motivated derivations were never properly appreciated despite the fact that his is the only theory based on a relativistically correct foundation. The development of his arguments reveals that although non-relativistic theory correctly predicts what it is possible to observe (the emissions) with remarkable accuracy it neglects the other half of natural phenomena, that which cannot be observed (the absorptions), thereby violating the conservation of energy. The deficiencies in non-relativistic theory are corrected by applying Hamilton’s principle to derive relativistic equations of motion. This allows quantum mechanical formalism in abstract space to be interpreted as the juxtaposition of particle field geometries in real space. Direct application of the calculus of variations to an electron cycle reveals that the wave function is incomplete because it requires twice the allowable action minimum.

Qeios•Feb 22, 2024•2 citations

Once more on the derivation of the Dirac equation

В. М. Симулик, I.Yu. Krivsky

A brief review of the different ways of the Dirac equation derivation is given. The foundations of the relativistic canonical quantum mechanics of a fermionic doublet are formulated. In our approach the Dirac equation is derived from the main equation of relativistic canonical quantum mechanics. In the formalism of relativistic canonical quantum mechanics the absence of necessity to appeal for the conception of the negative mass of the antiparticle is shown.

arXiv:1309.0573•Sep 3, 2013•2 citations
It is often claimed that Einstein is wrong about quantum mechanics. However, when comparisons are made with respect to theoretical foundations rather than experimental results Einstein’s theories are found to be superior. Because he did not complete his own quantum theory its far-reaching, intuitively motivated derivations were never properly appreciated despite the fact that his is the only theory based on a relativistically correct foundation. The development of his arguments reveals that although non-relativistic theory correctly predicts what it is possible to observe (the emissions) with remarkable accuracy it neglects the other half of natural phenomena, that which cannot be observed (the absorptions), thereby violating the conservation of energy. The deficiencies in non-relativistic theory are corrected by applying Hamilton’s principle to derive relativistic equations of motion. This allows quantum mechanical formalism in abstract space to be interpreted as the juxtaposition of particle field geometries in real space. Direct application of the calculus of variations to an electron cycle reveals that the wave function is incomplete because it requires twice the allowable action minimum.