Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

The Momentum Distribution in Hydrogen-Like Atoms

Boris Podolsky, Linus Carl Pauling

Published Jul 1, 1929• 262 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The probability density that an electron have certain momenta is given by the square of the absolute magnitude of a momentum eigenfunction ${\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}_{\mathrm{nlm}}(P, \ensuremath{\Theta}, \ensuremath{\Phi})$, in which $P$, $\ensuremath{\Theta}$, and $\ensuremath{\Phi}$ are spatial polar coordinates of the total momentum vector referred to the same axes as the coordinates $r$, $\ensuremath{\theta}$, and $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ of the electron. The following general expression for these functions for a hydrogen-like atom is obtained: ${\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}_{\mathrm{nlm}}(P, \ensuremath{\Theta}, \ensuremath{\Phi})=\left\{\frac{1}{{(2\ensuremath{\pi})}^{\frac{1}{2}}}{e}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\mathrm{im}\ensuremath{\Phi}}\right\} \left\{{\left(\frac{(2l+1)(l\ensuremath{-}m)!}{2(l+m)!}\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}{{P}_{l}}^{m}(cos\ensuremath{\Theta})\right\}$ $\left\{\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}{2}^{2l+4}l!}{{(\ensuremath{\gamma}h)}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\left(\frac{n(n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1)!}{(n+l)!}\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{{\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{l}}{{({\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{2}+1)}^{l+2}}{C}_{n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1}^{l+1}\left(\frac{{\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{2}\ensuremath{-}1}{{\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{2}+1}\right)\right\}$ in which $\ensuremath{\zeta}=(\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}}{\ensuremath{\gamma}h})P$, with $\ensuremath{\gamma}=(\frac{4{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}{e}^{2}Z}{n{h}^{2}})=(\frac{Z}{n{a}_{0}})$. The probability ${\ensuremath{\Xi}}_{\mathrm{nl}}(P)\mathrm{dP}$ that the electron have a total momentum lying within the limits $P$ and $P+dP$ is also evaluated, and it is shown that the root mean square of the total momentum is equal to the momentum of the electron in a circular Bohr orbit with the same total quantum number.

DOI
10.1103/physrev.34.109

Related papers

The Hydrogen-Like Atom

Uri Peskin

The mere existence of stable atoms, and their arrangement into many-atom nanoscale structures, can only be explained by the laws of quantum mechanics. Indeed, the accumulated evidence regarding the internal structure of atoms motivated the formulation of quantum mechanics at the early twentieth century. Here we focus on single-electron (hydrogen-like) atoms. The dominance of the Coulomb central potential between the electron and nucleus, translates into a simple Schrödinger equation for their relative position distribution. Solving rigorously this equation reveals quantized energy levels, which explains the emission spectra of hydrogen-like atoms (Rydberg formula). The corresponding stationary probability density distributions for the electron around the nucleus are reminiscent of the Bohr model, where classical trajectories (orbits) are replaced by single-electron wave functions (orbitals). The degeneracies of different orbitals, associated with three quantum numbers, will later turn out to be critical for understanding many-electron atoms and the periodic table of the elements.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 11, 2023•0 citations

The rule of radius averaging in hydrogen atom

Abdurrouf

Abstract According to quantum mechanics, electrons do not have a fixed position in an atom, and therefore orbitals have no definite radii. However, electrons have characteristic wave functions from which the radius of their orbits can be calculated or averaged. Depending on the average method, there are three most popular expressions for orbital radius, namely the average radius, the root mean square (rms) radius, and the most probable radius. Unfortunately, for hydrogen atom, none of those three radii is equal to the classical radius, even for large principal quantum numbers called the classical regime. Here, by using energy analysis, we propose a harmonic radius and show that the results well agree with the classical radius for each principal and orbital quantum numbers.

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering•Jun 1, 2019•0 citations

Hydrogen atom in the momentum representation

John R. Lombardi

The wave functions for the hydrogen atom are determined in the momentum representation, using momentum variables ${p}_{r}$, ${p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$, ${p}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$ which are associated with the spherical polar variables $r$, $t(={e}^{i\ensuremath{\pi}cos\ensuremath{\theta}})$ and $v({e}^{i\ensuremath{\varphi}})$. The functions may be written as ${{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{n,l,m}({p}_{r},{p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}},{p}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}})={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{n,l}({p}_{r}){\ensuremath{\beta}}_{l}^{m}({p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}})\ensuremath{\delta}({p}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}+m),}{{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{n,l}({p}_{r})={\left(\frac{n}{i{p}_{0}}\right)}^{3l+z}\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1}{k=0}\left({n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1}{k}\right)\frac{{2}^{k\ensuremath{-}l+1}}{(2l+k+1)(2l+k)\ensuremath{\cdots}(l+k+2)}{\left(\frac{\frac{i{p}_{0}}{n}}{{p}_{r}\ensuremath{-}\frac{i{p}_{0}}{n}}\right)}^{l+k+2},}{{\ensuremath{\beta}}_{l}^{m}({p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}})=\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{E(\frac{l}{2})}{j=E(\frac{m}{2})}{{a}_{j}{p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}}^{\ensuremath{-}\frac{(m+1)}{2}}{J}_{\frac{j\ensuremath{-}(m\ensuremath{-}1)}{2}}({p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}),}$ where $\ensuremath{\delta}$ is the Dirac delta function and ${p}_{0}=Z{a}_{0}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ (${a}_{0}$ is the Bohr radius). ${J}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}({p}_{0})$ are Bessel functions of integer or half-integer order. The radial functions are shown to have poles up to order $n+1$ at ${p}_{r}=i\frac{{p}_{0}}{n}$.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1980•33 citations

Hidden symmetry and explicit spheroidal eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom

Stella M. Sung, Dudley R. Herschbach

The Schrödinger equation for a hydrogenic atom is separable in prolate spheroidal coordinates, as a consequence of the ‘‘hidden symmetry’’ stemming from the fixed spatial orientation of the classical Kepler orbits. One focus is at the nucleus and the other a distance R away along the major axis of the elliptic orbit. The separation constant α is not an elementary function of Z or R or quantum numbers. However, for given principal quantum number n and angular momentum projection m, the allowed values of α and corresponding eigenfunctions in spheroidal coordinates are readily obtained from a secular equation of order n−m. We evaluate α(n,m;ZR) and the coefficients gl(α) that specify the spheroidal eigenfunctions as hybrids of the familiar ‖nlm〉 hydrogen-atom states with fixed n and m but different l values. Explicit formulas and plots are given for α and gl and for the probability distributions derived from the hybrid wave functions, ∑lgl(α)‖nlm〉, for all states up through n=4. In the limit R→∞ these hybrids become the solutions in parabolic coordinates, determined simply by geometrical Clebsch–Gordan coefficients that account for conservation of angular momentum and the hidden symmetry. We also briefly discuss some applications of the spheroidal eigenfunctions, particularly to exact analytic solutions of two-center molecular orbitals for special values of R and the nuclear charge ratio Za/Zb.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 15, 1991•21 citations

The Hydrogen-Like Atoms

Steven A. Adelman

In Section 1.3 , we developed the Bohr theory of the hydrogen-like atoms: H , H e + , L i 2 + https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429155741/5d159368-dc20-4763-957b-88b0e101c959/content/C010_equ_0001.tif"/> , and so on. Here, we develop the modern quantum theory of these atoms. Again, we deal with a two-particle system comprised of an electron of mass 10.1 m e = 9.10938972 × 10 − 31 k g https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429155741/5d159368-dc20-4763-957b-88b0e101c959/content/C010_equ_0002.tif"/>

CRC Press eBooks•May 31, 2021•0 citations

The uncertainties in radial position and radial momentum of an electron in the non-relativistic hydrogen-like atom

Cheng‐Deng Kuo

Annals of Physics•Dec 16, 2004•28 citations
The probability density that an electron have certain momenta is given by the square of the absolute magnitude of a momentum eigenfunction \ensuremathΥnlm(P,\ensuremathΘ,\ensuremathΦ){\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}_{\mathrm{nlm}}(P, \ensuremath{\Theta}, \ensuremath{\Phi})\ensuremathΥnlm​(P,\ensuremathΘ,\ensuremathΦ), in which PPP, \ensuremathΘ\ensuremath{\Theta}\ensuremathΘ, and \ensuremathΦ\ensuremath{\Phi}\ensuremathΦ are spatial polar coordinates of the total momentum vector referred to the same axes as the coordinates rrr, \ensuremathθ\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremathθ, and \ensuremathφ\ensuremath{\varphi}\ensuremathφ of the electron. The following general expression for these functions for a hydrogen-like atom is obtained: \ensuremathΥnlm(P,\ensuremathΘ,\ensuremathΦ)={1(2\ensuremathπ)12e\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fiim\ensuremathΦ}{((2l+1)(l\ensuremath−m)!2(l+m)!)12Plm(cos\ensuremathΘ)}{\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}_{\mathrm{nlm}}(P, \ensuremath{\Theta}, \ensuremath{\Phi})=\left\{\frac{1}{{(2\ensuremath{\pi})}^{\frac{1}{2}}}{e}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\mathrm{im}\ensuremath{\Phi}}\right\} \left\{{\left(\frac{(2l+1)(l\ensuremath{-}m)!}{2(l+m)!}\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}{{P}_{l}}^{m}(cos\ensuremath{\Theta})\right\}\ensuremathΥnlm​(P,\ensuremathΘ,\ensuremathΦ)={(2\ensuremathπ)21​1​e\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fiim\ensuremathΦ}{(2(l+m)!(2l+1)(l\ensuremath−m)!​)21​Pl​m(cos\ensuremathΘ)} {\ensuremathπ22l+4l!(\ensuremathγh)32(n(n\ensuremath−l\ensuremath−1)!(n+l)!)12\ensuremathζl(\ensuremathζ2+1)l+2Cn\ensuremath−l\ensuremath−1l+1(\ensuremathζ2\ensuremath−1\ensuremathζ2+1)}\left\{\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}{2}^{2l+4}l!}{{(\ensuremath{\gamma}h)}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\left(\frac{n(n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1)!}{(n+l)!}\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{{\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{l}}{{({\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{2}+1)}^{l+2}}{C}_{n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1}^{l+1}\left(\frac{{\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{2}\ensuremath{-}1}{{\ensuremath{\zeta}}^{2}+1}\right)\right\}{(\ensuremathγh)23​\ensuremathπ22l+4l!​((n+l)!n(n\ensuremath−l\ensuremath−1)!​)21​(\ensuremathζ2+1)l+2\ensuremathζl​Cn\ensuremath−l\ensuremath−1l+1​(\ensuremathζ2+1\ensuremathζ2\ensuremath−1​)} in which \ensuremathζ=(2\ensuremathπ\ensuremathγh)P\ensuremath{\zeta}=(\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}}{\ensuremath{\gamma}h})P\ensuremathζ=(\ensuremathγh2\ensuremathπ​)P, with \ensuremathγ=(4\ensuremathπ2\ensuremathμe2Znh2)=(Zna0)\ensuremath{\gamma}=(\frac{4{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}{e}^{2}Z}{n{h}^{2}})=(\frac{Z}{n{a}_{0}})\ensuremathγ=(nh24\ensuremathπ2\ensuremathμe2Z​)=(na0​Z​). The probability \ensuremathΞnl(P)dP{\ensuremath{\Xi}}_{\mathrm{nl}}(P)\mathrm{dP}\ensuremathΞnl​(P)dP that the electron have a total momentum lying within the limits PPP and P+dPP+dPP+dP is also evaluated, and it is shown that the root mean square of the total momentum is equal to the momentum of the electron in a circular Bohr orbit with the same total quantum number.
The mere existence of stable atoms, and their arrangement into many-atom nanoscale structures, can only be explained by the laws of quantum mechanics. Indeed, the accumulated evidence regarding the internal structure of atoms motivated the formulation of quantum mechanics at the early twentieth century. Here we focus on single-electron (hydrogen-like) atoms. The dominance of the Coulomb central potential between the electron and nucleus, translates into a simple Schrödinger equation for their relative position distribution. Solving rigorously this equation reveals quantized energy levels, which explains the emission spectra of hydrogen-like atoms (Rydberg formula). The corresponding stationary probability density distributions for the electron around the nucleus are reminiscent of the Bohr model, where classical trajectories (orbits) are replaced by single-electron wave functions (orbitals). The degeneracies of different orbitals, associated with three quantum numbers, will later turn out to be critical for understanding many-electron atoms and the periodic table of the elements.
Abstract According to quantum mechanics, electrons do not have a fixed position in an atom, and therefore orbitals have no definite radii. However, electrons have characteristic wave functions from which the radius of their orbits can be calculated or averaged. Depending on the average method, there are three most popular expressions for orbital radius, namely the average radius, the root mean square (rms) radius, and the most probable radius. Unfortunately, for hydrogen atom, none of those three radii is equal to the classical radius, even for large principal quantum numbers called the classical regime. Here, by using energy analysis, we propose a harmonic radius and show that the results well agree with the classical radius for each principal and orbital quantum numbers.
The wave functions for the hydrogen atom are determined in the momentum representation, using momentum variables pr{p}_{r}pr​, ${p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$, ${p}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$ which are associated with the spherical polar variables rrr, $t(={e}^{i\ensuremath{\pi}cos\ensuremath{\theta}})$ and $v({e}^{i\ensuremath{\varphi}})$. The functions may be written as ${{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{n,l,m}({p}_{r},{p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}},{p}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}})={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{n,l}({p}_{r}){\ensuremath{\beta}}_{l}^{m}({p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}})\ensuremath{\delta}({p}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}+m),}{{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{n,l}({p}_{r})={\left(\frac{n}{i{p}_{0}}\right)}^{3l+z}\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1}{k=0}\left({n\ensuremath{-}l\ensuremath{-}1}{k}\right)\frac{{2}^{k\ensuremath{-}l+1}}{(2l+k+1)(2l+k)\ensuremath{\cdots}(l+k+2)}{\left(\frac{\frac{i{p}_{0}}{n}}{{p}_{r}\ensuremath{-}\frac{i{p}_{0}}{n}}\right)}^{l+k+2},}{{\ensuremath{\beta}}_{l}^{m}({p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}})=\ensuremath{\Sigma}\stackrel{E(\frac{l}{2})}{j=E(\frac{m}{2})}{{a}_{j}{p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}}^{\ensuremath{-}\frac{(m+1)}{2}}{J}_{\frac{j\ensuremath{-}(m\ensuremath{-}1)}{2}}({p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}),}$ where $\ensuremath{\delta}$ is the Dirac delta function and ${p}_{0}=Z{a}_{0}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ (a0{a}_{0}a0​ is the Bohr radius). ${J}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}({p}_{0})$ are Bessel functions of integer or half-integer order. The radial functions are shown to have poles up to order n+1n+1n+1 at pr=ip0n{p}_{r}=i\frac{{p}_{0}}{n}pr​=inp0​​.
The Schrödinger equation for a hydrogenic atom is separable in prolate spheroidal coordinates, as a consequence of the ‘‘hidden symmetry’’ stemming from the fixed spatial orientation of the classical Kepler orbits. One focus is at the nucleus and the other a distance R away along the major axis of the elliptic orbit. The separation constant α is not an elementary function of Z or R or quantum numbers. However, for given principal quantum number n and angular momentum projection m, the allowed values of α and corresponding eigenfunctions in spheroidal coordinates are readily obtained from a secular equation of order n−m. We evaluate α(n,m;ZR) and the coefficients gl(α) that specify the spheroidal eigenfunctions as hybrids of the familiar ‖nlm〉 hydrogen-atom states with fixed n and m but different l values. Explicit formulas and plots are given for α and gl and for the probability distributions derived from the hybrid wave functions, ∑lgl(α)‖nlm〉, for all states up through n=4. In the limit R→∞ these hybrids become the solutions in parabolic coordinates, determined simply by geometrical Clebsch–Gordan coefficients that account for conservation of angular momentum and the hidden symmetry. We also briefly discuss some applications of the spheroidal eigenfunctions, particularly to exact analytic solutions of two-center molecular orbitals for special values of R and the nuclear charge ratio Za/Zb.
In Section 1.3 , we developed the Bohr theory of the hydrogen-like atoms: H , H e + , L i 2 + https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429155741/5d159368-dc20-4763-957b-88b0e101c959/content/C010_equ_0001.tif"/> , and so on. Here, we develop the modern quantum theory of these atoms. Again, we deal with a two-particle system comprised of an electron of mass 10.1 m e = 9.10938972 × 10 − 31 k g https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780429155741/5d159368-dc20-4763-957b-88b0e101c959/content/C010_equ_0002.tif"/>