Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Investigating the practical implementation of Shor's algorithm

Simon J. Devitt, Austin G. Fowler, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

Published Feb 23, 2005• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The publication in 1994 of Shor's algorithm, which allows factorization of composite number N in a time polynomial in its binary length L has been the primary catalyst for the race to construct a functional quantum computer. However, it seems clear that any practical system that may be developed will not be able to perform completely error free quantum gate operations or shield even idle qubits from inevitable error effects. Hence, the practicality of quantum algorithms needs to be investigated to estimate what demands must be made of quantum error correction (QEC). Several different quantum circuits implementing the quantum period finding (QPF) subroutine, which lies at the heart of Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits can be interacted. While some architectures posses this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realizing a single line of qubits with nearest neighbor interactions only. This paper will present a circuit suitable for implementing the QPF subroutine for such linear nearest neighbor (LNN) designs. We will then present direct simulation results showing for both the LNN circuit and for a circuit utilizing arbitrary interactions, that the QPF subroutine is very sensitive to a small number of errors in the entire circuit. These results can then be used to briefly examine some of the practical issues to implementing such large scale quantum algorithms.

DOI
10.1117/12.583191

Related papers

Investigating the practical implementation of Shor's algorithm

Simon J. Devitt, Austin G. Fowler, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

The publication in 1994 of Shor's algorithm, which allows factorization of composite number N in a time polynomial in its binary length L has been the primary catalyst for the race to construct a functional quantum computer. However, it seems clear that any practical system that may be developed will not be able to perform completely error free quantum gate operations or shield even idle qubits from inevitable error effects. Hence, the practicality of quantum algorithms needs to be investigated to estimate what demands must be made of quantum error correction (QEC). Several different quantum circuits implementing the quantum period finding (QPF) subroutine, which lies at the heart of Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits can be interacted. While some architectures posses this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realizing a single line of qubits with nearest neighbor interactions only. This paper will present a circuit suitable for implementing the QPF subroutine for such linear nearest neighbor (LNN) designs. We will then present direct simulation results showing for both the LNN circuit and for a circuit utilizing arbitrary interactions, that the QPF subroutine is very sensitive to a small number of errors in the entire circuit. These results can then be used to briefly examine some of the practical issues to implementing such large scale quantum algorithms.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Simulations of Shor's algorithm with implications to scaling and quantum error correction

Simon J. Devitt, Austin G. Fowler, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

The publication in 1994 of Shor's algorithm, which allows factorisation of composite number N in a time polynomial in its binary length L has been the primary catalyst for the race to construct a functional quantum computer. However, it seems clear that any practical system that may be developed will not be able to perform completely error free quantum gate operations or shield even idle qubits from inevitable error effects. Hence, the practicality of quantum algorithms needs to be investigated to not only determine limitations on such algorithms in a noisy quantum computer, but also to estimate what demands must be made of quantum error correction (QEC). Shor's algorithm is a combination of both classical pre and post-processing, and also a quantum period finding subroutine (QPF) which allows for the exponential speed up of this algorithm on a quantum device. This paper will look at the stability of this quantum subroutine under the effects of several error models. Direct simulation of the entire QPF subroutine required to factorise a given composite number N in the presence of errors shows that the circuit required to implement Shor's algorithm is very sensitive to a small number of errors within the entire calculation. Well designed and efficient error correction codes, quick gate times and very low gate error rates will be essential for any physical realisation of Shor's factoring algorithm.

arXiv:quant-ph/0408081•Aug 12, 2004•5 citations

Implementation of Shor's Algorithm on a Linear Nearest Neighbour Qubit Array

Austin G. Fowler, Simon J. Devitt, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

Shor's algorithm, which given appropriate hardware can factorise an integer $N$ in a time polynomial in its binary length $L$, has arguable spurred the race to build a practical quantum computer. Several different quantum circuits implementing Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits within the computer can be interacted. While some quantum computer architectures possess this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realising a single line of qubits with nearest neighbour interactions only. In light of this, we present a circuit implementing Shor's factorisation algorithm designed for such a linear nearest neighbour architecture. Despite the interaction restrictions, the circuit requires just $2L+4$ qubits and to first order requires $8L^{4}$ gates arranged in a circuit of depth $32L^{3}$ -- identical to first order to that possible using an architecture that can interact arbitrary pairs of qubits.

arXiv:quant-ph/0402196•Feb 25, 2004•4 citations

Implementation of Shor's algorithm on a linear nearest neighbour qubit array

Austin G. Fowler, Simon J. Devitt, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

Shor's algorithm, which given appropriate hardware can factorise an integer N in a time polynomial in its binary length L, has arguably spurred the race to build a practical quantum computer. Several different quantum circuits implementing Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits within the computer can be interacted. While some quantum computer architectures possess this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realising a single line of qubits with nearest neighbour interactions only. In light of this, we present a circuit implementing Shor's factorisation algorithm designed for such a linear nearest neighbour architecture. Despite the interaction restrictions, the circuit requires just 2L+4 qubits and to leading order requires 8L^4 2-qubit gates arranged in a circuit of depth 32L^3 --- identical to leading order to that possible using an architecture that can interact arbitrary pairs of qubits.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jul 1, 2004•73 citations

Implementation of Shor's algorithm on a linear nearest neighbour qubit array

Austin G. Fowler, Simon J. Devitt, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

Shor's algorithm, which given appropriate hardware can factorise an integer $N$ in a time polynomial in its binary length $L$, has arguable spurred the race to build a practical quantum computer. Several different quantum circuits implementing Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits within the computer can be interacted. While some quantum computer architectures possess this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realising a single line of qubits with nearest neighbour interactions only. In light of this, we present a circuit implementing Shor's factorisation algorithm designed for such a linear nearest neighbour architecture. Despite the interaction restrictions, the circuit requires just $2L+4$ qubits and to first order requires $8L^{4}$ gates arranged in a circuit of depth $32L^{3}$ -- identical to first order to that possible using an architecture that can interact arbitrary pairs of qubits.

•Jul 1, 2004•139 citations

Towards Large-Scale Quantum Computation

Austin G. Fowler

This thesis deals with a series of quantum computer implementation issues from the Kane 31P in 28Si architecture to Shor's integer factoring algorithm and beyond. The discussion begins with simulations of the adiabatic Kane CNOT and readout gates, followed by linear nearest neighbor implementations of 5-qubit quantum error correction with and without fast measurement. A linear nearest neighbor circuit implementing Shor's algorithm is presented, then modified to remove the need for exponentially small rotation gates. Finally, a method of constructing optimal approximations of arbitrary single-qubit fault-tolerant gates is described and applied to the specific case of the remaining rotation gates required by Shor's algorithm.

arXiv:quant-ph/0506126•Jun 16, 2005•15 citations
The publication in 1994 of Shor's algorithm, which allows factorization of composite number N in a time polynomial in its binary length L has been the primary catalyst for the race to construct a functional quantum computer. However, it seems clear that any practical system that may be developed will not be able to perform completely error free quantum gate operations or shield even idle qubits from inevitable error effects. Hence, the practicality of quantum algorithms needs to be investigated to estimate what demands must be made of quantum error correction (QEC). Several different quantum circuits implementing the quantum period finding (QPF) subroutine, which lies at the heart of Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits can be interacted. While some architectures posses this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realizing a single line of qubits with nearest neighbor interactions only. This paper will present a circuit suitable for implementing the QPF subroutine for such linear nearest neighbor (LNN) designs. We will then present direct simulation results showing for both the LNN circuit and for a circuit utilizing arbitrary interactions, that the QPF subroutine is very sensitive to a small number of errors in the entire circuit. These results can then be used to briefly examine some of the practical issues to implementing such large scale quantum algorithms.
The publication in 1994 of Shor's algorithm, which allows factorization of composite number N in a time polynomial in its binary length L has been the primary catalyst for the race to construct a functional quantum computer. However, it seems clear that any practical system that may be developed will not be able to perform completely error free quantum gate operations or shield even idle qubits from inevitable error effects. Hence, the practicality of quantum algorithms needs to be investigated to estimate what demands must be made of quantum error correction (QEC). Several different quantum circuits implementing the quantum period finding (QPF) subroutine, which lies at the heart of Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits can be interacted. While some architectures posses this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realizing a single line of qubits with nearest neighbor interactions only. This paper will present a circuit suitable for implementing the QPF subroutine for such linear nearest neighbor (LNN) designs. We will then present direct simulation results showing for both the LNN circuit and for a circuit utilizing arbitrary interactions, that the QPF subroutine is very sensitive to a small number of errors in the entire circuit. These results can then be used to briefly examine some of the practical issues to implementing such large scale quantum algorithms.
The publication in 1994 of Shor's algorithm, which allows factorisation of composite number N in a time polynomial in its binary length L has been the primary catalyst for the race to construct a functional quantum computer. However, it seems clear that any practical system that may be developed will not be able to perform completely error free quantum gate operations or shield even idle qubits from inevitable error effects. Hence, the practicality of quantum algorithms needs to be investigated to not only determine limitations on such algorithms in a noisy quantum computer, but also to estimate what demands must be made of quantum error correction (QEC). Shor's algorithm is a combination of both classical pre and post-processing, and also a quantum period finding subroutine (QPF) which allows for the exponential speed up of this algorithm on a quantum device. This paper will look at the stability of this quantum subroutine under the effects of several error models. Direct simulation of the entire QPF subroutine required to factorise a given composite number N in the presence of errors shows that the circuit required to implement Shor's algorithm is very sensitive to a small number of errors within the entire calculation. Well designed and efficient error correction codes, quick gate times and very low gate error rates will be essential for any physical realisation of Shor's factoring algorithm.
Shor's algorithm, which given appropriate hardware can factorise an integer NNN in a time polynomial in its binary length LLL, has arguable spurred the race to build a practical quantum computer. Several different quantum circuits implementing Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits within the computer can be interacted. While some quantum computer architectures possess this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realising a single line of qubits with nearest neighbour interactions only. In light of this, we present a circuit implementing Shor's factorisation algorithm designed for such a linear nearest neighbour architecture. Despite the interaction restrictions, the circuit requires just 2L+42L+42L+4 qubits and to first order requires 8L48L^{4}8L4 gates arranged in a circuit of depth 32L332L^{3}32L3 -- identical to first order to that possible using an architecture that can interact arbitrary pairs of qubits.
Shor's algorithm, which given appropriate hardware can factorise an integer N in a time polynomial in its binary length L, has arguably spurred the race to build a practical quantum computer. Several different quantum circuits implementing Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits within the computer can be interacted. While some quantum computer architectures possess this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realising a single line of qubits with nearest neighbour interactions only. In light of this, we present a circuit implementing Shor's factorisation algorithm designed for such a linear nearest neighbour architecture. Despite the interaction restrictions, the circuit requires just 2L+4 qubits and to leading order requires 8L^4 2-qubit gates arranged in a circuit of depth 32L^3 --- identical to leading order to that possible using an architecture that can interact arbitrary pairs of qubits.
Shor's algorithm, which given appropriate hardware can factorise an integer NNN in a time polynomial in its binary length LLL, has arguable spurred the race to build a practical quantum computer. Several different quantum circuits implementing Shor's algorithm have been designed, but each tacitly assumes that arbitrary pairs of qubits within the computer can be interacted. While some quantum computer architectures possess this property, many promising proposals are best suited to realising a single line of qubits with nearest neighbour interactions only. In light of this, we present a circuit implementing Shor's factorisation algorithm designed for such a linear nearest neighbour architecture. Despite the interaction restrictions, the circuit requires just 2L+42L+42L+4 qubits and to first order requires 8L48L^{4}8L4 gates arranged in a circuit of depth 32L332L^{3}32L3 -- identical to first order to that possible using an architecture that can interact arbitrary pairs of qubits.
This thesis deals with a series of quantum computer implementation issues from the Kane 31P in 28Si architecture to Shor's integer factoring algorithm and beyond. The discussion begins with simulations of the adiabatic Kane CNOT and readout gates, followed by linear nearest neighbor implementations of 5-qubit quantum error correction with and without fast measurement. A linear nearest neighbor circuit implementing Shor's algorithm is presented, then modified to remove the need for exponentially small rotation gates. Finally, a method of constructing optimal approximations of arbitrary single-qubit fault-tolerant gates is described and applied to the specific case of the remaining rotation gates required by Shor's algorithm.