Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series

Are there quantum jumps

David K. Ferry

Published Jan 1, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Generally, one thinks of a “quantum jump” as the process in which an electron “jumps” between a pair of quantum states, even as the process is treated within perturbation theory. This jump of an electron has remained a key point of conservative (i.e., traditional) quantum mechanics. But, the question of the time dependence of such a transition, e.g. the time for an atom to be ionized by radiation, is somewhat different than this view. A detailed approach in which an incoming wave first polarizes the quantum states and then completes the transition has allowed for a detailed discussion of the smooth transition of the electron from one state to the next. Here, we will discuss the history of the process, and illustrate the approach with the question of “how long does it take for an electron to emit a phonon?” The entire process arises from the proper application of wave mechanics and obviates the need to even consider a discussion of quantum jumps.

DOI
10.1142/s2010194514603585

Related papers

Quantum jumps, superpositions, and the continuous evolution of quantum states

Rainer Dick

The apparent dichotomy between quantum jumps on the one hand, and continuous time evolution according to wave equations on the other hand, provided a challenge to Bohr's proposal of quantum jumps in atoms. Furthermore, Schrödinger's time-dependent equation also seemed to require a modification of the explanation for the origin of line spectra due to the apparent possibility of superpositions of energy eigenstates for different energy levels. Indeed, Schrödinger himself proposed a quantum beat mechanism for the generation of discrete line spectra from superpositions of eigenstates with different energies. However, these issues between old quantum theory and Schrödinger's wave mechanics were correctly resolved only after the development and full implementation of photon quantization. The second quantized scattering matrix formalism reconciles quantum jumps with continuous time evolution through the identification of quantum jumps with transitions between different sectors of Fock space. The continuous evolution of quantum states is then recognized as a sum over continually evolving jump amplitudes between different sectors in Fock space. In today's terminology, this suggests that linear combinations of scattering matrix elements are epistemic sums over ontic states. Insights from the resolution of the dichotomy between quantum jumps and continuous time evolution therefore hold important lessons for modern research both on interpretations of quantum mechanics and on the foundations of quantum computing. They demonstrate that discussions of interpretations of quantum theory necessarily need to take into account field quantization. They also demonstrate the limitations of the role of wave equations in quantum theory, and caution us that superpositions of quantum states for the formation of qubits may be more limited than usually expected.

arXiv:1703.06230•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Dec 3, 2016•10 citations

Quantum transitions without quantum jumps

James D. Macomber

It is now recognized that quantum systems undergoing an uninterrupted transition between two stationary states (due to the influence of a coherent perturbation) do so in a smooth, continuous process that does not involve a quantum jump. The theoretical reasons for this continuity are given, and an atomic beam experiment is described that might be used to illustrate the process.

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1977•3 citations

Transition between atomic states and semi-classical radiation theory using quantum perturbation

Michael de Melo, Angelo Rober Pulici

Some phenomena cannot be solved using the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. However, using approximated methods such as perturbation theory we are able to obtain remarkable results considering terms up to second order. The physical phenomena studied here are the absorption and stimulated emission by the classical feature. In addition, we are going to discuss the physical meaning of perturbation theory when we treat the behaviour how initial state ket evolves as time goes on. We will evaluate the transition of probability between states, the rate and the energy involved in the atomic transitions. It will be introduced fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics, such as interaction picture, and a general perturbation theory using constant and sinusoidal time-dependent perturbation term. Concerning to these phenomena, we considered the perturbed term of the Hamiltonian of the interaction between the vector potential and electron momentum.

Revista Unifev: Ciência & Tecnologia•Sep 19, 2017•0 citations

- Time Dependence

Alastair I. M. Rae, Jim Napolitano

So far in our development of quantum mechanics, we have given very little consideration to problems involving the time dependence of the wave function. This is rather surprising as in classical mechanics it is time-dependent phenomenai.e., dynamics rather than statics-that command most attention. Moreover, most experimental observations necessarily involve some change in the quantity being observed, so we might expect that the successful prediction of experimental results will require a detailed understanding of the way in which a system changes with time. In fact we have already made some implicit assumptions about time dependence and the principal reason why we have got so far without discussing it in detail is that many observed quantum phenomena are associated with sudden discontinuous changes between otherwise stable states. Thus, most of our information concerning the energy levels of atoms has been obtained from measurements of the frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted or absorbed as the atom undergoes a transition from one energy eigenstate to another, assuming the correctness of the formula E = }ω, but not considering the mechanism of the transition in any detail. Assumptions concerning time dependence are also implicit in the quantum theory of measurement which refers to the probability of obtaining a particular result following a measurement performed on a system in a given state; thus the state vector of a spinhalf particle changes from being an eigenvector Sˆ z to being one of Sˆ x following a measurement of the latter property using an appropriately oriented Stern-Gerlach apparatus. However, as was pointed out in Chapter 7, and will be discussed further in Chapters 15 and 16, the collapse of the wave function associated with a measurement is not a direct consequence of the time-dependent Schro¨dinger equation.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2015•0 citations

Macroscopic quantum jumps

Partha Ghose

Introduction The quantum theory of atoms and molecules had its origin in the famous 1913 paper of Bohr [186] in which he suggested that the interaction of radiation and atoms occurred with the transition of an atom from one stationary internal state to another, accompanied by the emission or absorption of radiation of a frequency determined by the energy difference between these states. These transitions came to be known as ‘quantum jumps’. Since all experiments until the late 1970s used to be carried out with large ensembles of atoms and molecules, these jumps were masked and could not be directly observed; they were only inferred from spectroscopic data. In fact, with the advent of quantum mechanics they eventually came to be regarded as artefacts of Bohr's simple-minded semi-classical model. But with the availability of coherent light sources and single ions prepared in ion traps [187], [188], and optically cooled [189], [190], the issue has been reopened with the experimental demonstration of quantum jumps in single ions [191], [192], [193]. These experiments have also opened up the contentious issue of wave function collapse or reduction on measurement, as they can be regarded as making collapse visible on the oscilloscope screen [191]. Evidence of the discrete nature of quantum transitions in a single quantum system had been accumulating from the observation of photon anti-bunching in single-atom resonance fluorescence [194], the tunneling of single electrons in metal–oxide-–semiconductor junctions [195] and spin-flips of individual electrons in a Penning trap [196].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations

Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory: a short history and a worked example

Yves Pomeau A, Martine Le Berre

A major question in our understanding of the fabric of the world is where the randomness of some quantum phenomena comes from and how to represent it in a rational theory. The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics made its way progressively since the early days of the theory. We summarize the main historical steps and then we outline how the randomness gains to be depicted by using tools adapted to Markov processes. We consider a model system corresponding to experimental situations, namely a single two-level atom submitted to a monochromatic light triggering transitions from the ground to the excited state. After a short summary of present quantum approaches, we explain how a general "kinetic-like" Kolmogorov equation yields the statistical properties of the fluorescent light radiated by the atom which makes at once Rabi oscillations between the two states, and random quantum jumps with photo-emission. As an exemple we give the probability distribution of the time intervals between two successive emitted photons by using the Kolmogorov equation.

arXiv:1810.02884•Oct 5, 2018•0 citations
Generally, one thinks of a “quantum jump” as the process in which an electron “jumps” between a pair of quantum states, even as the process is treated within perturbation theory. This jump of an electron has remained a key point of conservative (i.e., traditional) quantum mechanics. But, the question of the time dependence of such a transition, e.g. the time for an atom to be ionized by radiation, is somewhat different than this view. A detailed approach in which an incoming wave first polarizes the quantum states and then completes the transition has allowed for a detailed discussion of the smooth transition of the electron from one state to the next. Here, we will discuss the history of the process, and illustrate the approach with the question of “how long does it take for an electron to emit a phonon?” The entire process arises from the proper application of wave mechanics and obviates the need to even consider a discussion of quantum jumps.
The apparent dichotomy between quantum jumps on the one hand, and continuous time evolution according to wave equations on the other hand, provided a challenge to Bohr's proposal of quantum jumps in atoms. Furthermore, Schrödinger's time-dependent equation also seemed to require a modification of the explanation for the origin of line spectra due to the apparent possibility of superpositions of energy eigenstates for different energy levels. Indeed, Schrödinger himself proposed a quantum beat mechanism for the generation of discrete line spectra from superpositions of eigenstates with different energies. However, these issues between old quantum theory and Schrödinger's wave mechanics were correctly resolved only after the development and full implementation of photon quantization. The second quantized scattering matrix formalism reconciles quantum jumps with continuous time evolution through the identification of quantum jumps with transitions between different sectors of Fock space. The continuous evolution of quantum states is then recognized as a sum over continually evolving jump amplitudes between different sectors in Fock space. In today's terminology, this suggests that linear combinations of scattering matrix elements are epistemic sums over ontic states. Insights from the resolution of the dichotomy between quantum jumps and continuous time evolution therefore hold important lessons for modern research both on interpretations of quantum mechanics and on the foundations of quantum computing. They demonstrate that discussions of interpretations of quantum theory necessarily need to take into account field quantization. They also demonstrate the limitations of the role of wave equations in quantum theory, and caution us that superpositions of quantum states for the formation of qubits may be more limited than usually expected.
Some phenomena cannot be solved using the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation. However, using approximated methods such as perturbation theory we are able to obtain remarkable results considering terms up to second order. The physical phenomena studied here are the absorption and stimulated emission by the classical feature. In addition, we are going to discuss the physical meaning of perturbation theory when we treat the behaviour how initial state ket evolves as time goes on. We will evaluate the transition of probability between states, the rate and the energy involved in the atomic transitions. It will be introduced fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics, such as interaction picture, and a general perturbation theory using constant and sinusoidal time-dependent perturbation term. Concerning to these phenomena, we considered the perturbed term of the Hamiltonian of the interaction between the vector potential and electron momentum.
So far in our development of quantum mechanics, we have given very little consideration to problems involving the time dependence of the wave function. This is rather surprising as in classical mechanics it is time-dependent phenomenai.e., dynamics rather than statics-that command most attention. Moreover, most experimental observations necessarily involve some change in the quantity being observed, so we might expect that the successful prediction of experimental results will require a detailed understanding of the way in which a system changes with time. In fact we have already made some implicit assumptions about time dependence and the principal reason why we have got so far without discussing it in detail is that many observed quantum phenomena are associated with sudden discontinuous changes between otherwise stable states. Thus, most of our information concerning the energy levels of atoms has been obtained from measurements of the frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted or absorbed as the atom undergoes a transition from one energy eigenstate to another, assuming the correctness of the formula E = }ω, but not considering the mechanism of the transition in any detail. Assumptions concerning time dependence are also implicit in the quantum theory of measurement which refers to the probability of obtaining a particular result following a measurement performed on a system in a given state; thus the state vector of a spinhalf particle changes from being an eigenvector Sˆ z to being one of Sˆ x following a measurement of the latter property using an appropriately oriented Stern-Gerlach apparatus. However, as was pointed out in Chapter 7, and will be discussed further in Chapters 15 and 16, the collapse of the wave function associated with a measurement is not a direct consequence of the time-dependent Schro¨dinger equation.
Introduction The quantum theory of atoms and molecules had its origin in the famous 1913 paper of Bohr [186] in which he suggested that the interaction of radiation and atoms occurred with the transition of an atom from one stationary internal state to another, accompanied by the emission or absorption of radiation of a frequency determined by the energy difference between these states. These transitions came to be known as ‘quantum jumps’. Since all experiments until the late 1970s used to be carried out with large ensembles of atoms and molecules, these jumps were masked and could not be directly observed; they were only inferred from spectroscopic data. In fact, with the advent of quantum mechanics they eventually came to be regarded as artefacts of Bohr's simple-minded semi-classical model. But with the availability of coherent light sources and single ions prepared in ion traps [187], [188], and optically cooled [189], [190], the issue has been reopened with the experimental demonstration of quantum jumps in single ions [191], [192], [193]. These experiments have also opened up the contentious issue of wave function collapse or reduction on measurement, as they can be regarded as making collapse visible on the oscilloscope screen [191]. Evidence of the discrete nature of quantum transitions in a single quantum system had been accumulating from the observation of photon anti-bunching in single-atom resonance fluorescence [194], the tunneling of single electrons in metal–oxide-–semiconductor junctions [195] and spin-flips of individual electrons in a Penning trap [196].
A major question in our understanding of the fabric of the world is where the randomness of some quantum phenomena comes from and how to represent it in a rational theory. The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics made its way progressively since the early days of the theory. We summarize the main historical steps and then we outline how the randomness gains to be depicted by using tools adapted to Markov processes. We consider a model system corresponding to experimental situations, namely a single two-level atom submitted to a monochromatic light triggering transitions from the ground to the excited state. After a short summary of present quantum approaches, we explain how a general "kinetic-like" Kolmogorov equation yields the statistical properties of the fluorescent light radiated by the atom which makes at once Rabi oscillations between the two states, and random quantum jumps with photo-emission. As an exemple we give the probability distribution of the time intervals between two successive emitted photons by using the Kolmogorov equation.