Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Quantization in generalized coordinates III-Lagrangian formulation

Gary R. Gruber

Published Jan 1, 1973• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00798295

Related papers

Quantization in generalized coordinates

Gary R. Gruber

Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 1971•30 citations

Lagrangian quantum theory. III. Coordinate-free formulation

F. J. Bloore, L. Routh

For pt.II, see abstr. A66629 of 1973. The authors show that the Frechet derivative, which they have previously used to formulate a quantum-mechanical version of Hamilton's principle of stationary action, suffers from certain defects. They set up a simpler, coordinate-free, formulation of quantum mechanics based on the Lie algebra of symmetric contravariant tensor fields on the configuration manifold of the system and re-express the principle of stationary action using this formalism. They find the same relation between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian as before, but a much larger class of allowable variations, namely those associated with and C infinity vector fields.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical Nuclear and General•Oct 11, 1974•1 citation

Quantization in generalized coordinates?II

Gary R. Gruber

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1972•25 citations

Schwinger's Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics with Velocity Dependent Potential. III

Hideki Kamo, Toshiharu Kawai

Schwinger’s variational principle is formulated for the multi-dimensional quantum system which corresponds to the classical system described by the Lagrangian Lc(\dotx,x)=(M/2)gij(x)\dotxi\dotxj-v(x). The c-number variations of coordinates and time are sufficient to give the laws of quantum mechanics. The Euler-Lagrange equation, the canonical equations of motion and the canonical commutation relations are derived from this principle and there is no inconsistency. An appropriate choice of the Lagrangian operator is essential in our formulation. It is shown that an arbitrary point transformation is entitled to be called a canonical transformation. Ambiguities in the quantal Lagrangian are also discussed.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1973•12 citations

Lagrangian approach to Geometric Quantization

Nikolai Andreevich Tyurin

Trends in mathematics•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Path Integral Quantization of Regular Lagrangian

Ola A. Jarab’ah

Path integral formulation based on the canonical method is discussed. The Hamilton Jacobi function for regular Lagrangian is obtained using separation of variables method. This function is used to quantize regular systems using path integral method. The path integral is obtained as integration over the canonical phase space coordinates. One illustrative example is considered to demonstrate the application of our formalism.

Applied Physics Research•Jan 14, 2018•2 citations
For pt.II, see abstr. A66629 of 1973. The authors show that the Frechet derivative, which they have previously used to formulate a quantum-mechanical version of Hamilton's principle of stationary action, suffers from certain defects. They set up a simpler, coordinate-free, formulation of quantum mechanics based on the Lie algebra of symmetric contravariant tensor fields on the configuration manifold of the system and re-express the principle of stationary action using this formalism. They find the same relation between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian as before, but a much larger class of allowable variations, namely those associated with and C infinity vector fields.
Schwinger’s variational principle is formulated for the multi-dimensional quantum system which corresponds to the classical system described by the Lagrangian Lc(\dotx,x)=(M/2)gij(x)\dotxi\dotxj-v(x). The c-number variations of coordinates and time are sufficient to give the laws of quantum mechanics. The Euler-Lagrange equation, the canonical equations of motion and the canonical commutation relations are derived from this principle and there is no inconsistency. An appropriate choice of the Lagrangian operator is essential in our formulation. It is shown that an arbitrary point transformation is entitled to be called a canonical transformation. Ambiguities in the quantal Lagrangian are also discussed.