The requirement that the quantal wave function be single-valued is examined in the light of two recent developments: The effect of a magnetic vector potential on a particle moving in a multiply connected field-free region (Aharonov-Bohm effect), and the flux quantization inside a superconducting ring. Both of these effects are new applications of conventional elementary quantum mechanics. The single-valuedness problem is considered, with its historical background, for particles with no spin, particles with spin 12, and rigid bodies. It is shown that the single-valuedness condition, if properly adapted to the particular physical model, is deeply rooted in the foundations of quantum mechanics. However, wave functions which superficially appear to be double-valued are useful in an helicity representation of spinors and in the construction of nuclear wave functions.
The requirement that the quantal wave function be single-valued is examined in the light of two recent developments: The effect of a magnetic vector potential on a particle moving in a multiply connected field-free region (Aharonov-Bohm effect), and the flux quantization inside a superconducting ring. Both of these effects are new applications of conventional elementary quantum mechanics. The single-valuedness problem is considered, with its historical background, for particles with no spin, particles with spin 12, and rigid bodies. It is shown that the single-valuedness condition, if properly adapted to the particular physical model, is deeply rooted in the foundations of quantum mechanics. However, wave functions which superficially appear to be double-valued are useful in an helicity representation of spinors and in the construction of nuclear wave functions.
When Schrödinger solved the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom, he assumed the single-valuedness of the electronic wave function. Thereafter, this assumption has been one of the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics. When wave functions are multi-component, however, the imposing of the single-valued condition may become nontrivial. The spin-degree-of-freedom of electron makes electronic wave functions two-component. When spin-vortices are created by the conduction electrons and they move in the self-consistent field with the spin-vortices, the twisting of the spin basis occurs; then, the imposing of the single-valued condition becomes nontrivial, and a vector potential is induced. As a consequence, the effective vector potential becomes the sum of the vector potential from the induced one and that originates from the electric current. This effective vector potential is gauge invariant and the persistent current is generated by it. In the present work, we argue that if interactions that are omitted in the BCS reduced Hamiltonian are included, spin-vortices may be generated upon the application of a magnetic field. Then, the vector potential is induced and provides with the phase variable, θ, of the electron pair amplitude. The appearance of the spin-vortex provides with a new origin of θ; it originates from the induced gauge potential. This origin is compatible with the superselection rule for charge in contrast to the currently-accepted origin.
The Hamiltonian describing a system of particles in a rotating coordinate system is derived and it is shown that the simple classical solution of rigid flow is forbidden in quantum mechanics, even at very low angular velocities. This effect is closely parallel to the Aharonov–Bohm effect, which likewise has its origin in the single-valuedness requirement of the wave function. An analytical approach to perturbation theory is used to include the effects of the Coriolis and centrifugal forces and to derive the current flows for some independent-particle systems, that is, for the Inglis cranking model. It is shown, by explicit construction, that the currents are not rigid even when the moment of inertia assumes the rigid-flow value, as it does for the harmonic oscillator single-particle potential under conditions of self-consistency. Furthermore, it is shown that, for a more general potential, even the moment of inertia is not rigid.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential A, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics A is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than B in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant B field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the B field in the region inaccessible to the particle.
Quantum mechanics began in very early twentieth century when Max Planck found the expression for black body thermal radiation in which the emitted light was not a continuum as postulated by classical physics. Erwin Schrodinger applied his equation to solve the quantum harmonic oscillator, the quantum rigid rotor, and a hydrogen-like atom. Pertaining to the solution of the Schrodinger equation to hydrogen atoms are the quantum numbers. C. K. Ingold’s overview of Schrodinger wave mechanics: “What can be known about an electron, considered as a particle, is of a statistical nature, and is summarized in the behavior of a wave. When considering singlet substances, the normal Zeeman Effect occurs, providing the discrete values of the orbital angular momentum. In an attempt to rationalize the anomalous Zeeman effect, W. Pauli proposed the fourth degree of freedom of the electron which he called “two-valuedness not describable classically”.
Introduction The claim that it is impossible to construct a realistic physical model of quantum matter is often presented as definitively and finally proved in the case of systems with spin ½, or internal angular momentum of magnitude ħ/2, which exhibit a characteristic ‘nonclassical two-valuedness’. Nevertheless, the extension of the causal interpretation to embrace nonrelativistic spin ½ systems was successfully carried through in the 1950s (Bohm, Schiller & Tiomno, 1955; Bohm & Schiller, 1955; Takabayasi, 1955; Takabayasi & Vigier, 1957) and developed more recently (Dewdney, Holland & Kyprianidis, 1986, 1987a, b; Dewdney, Holland, Kyprianidis & Vigier, 1988). The idea is to assume that the spinor wave represents a new type of physical field propagating in spacetime that exerts an influence on a corpuscle moving within it. The additional information conveyed by the spinor beyond that contained in the spinless Schrödinger wave implies that the state of the particle is not exhausted by specifying its position and momentum, but that it is endowed with further properties such as an internal angular momentum. The equation governing the dynamics of the spinor wavefunction is the Pauli equation: where the Hamiltonian operator is given by Here e, m and μ are respectively the charge, mass and magnetic moment of the particle, A 0 and A are the electromagnetic potentials, B = ∇ × A is the magnetic field, V is any other external scalar potential, and σ is a vector whose components are the 2 × 2 Pauli matrices. The Hamiltonian (9.1.2) istherefore a 2 × 2 matrix operator and the wavefunction ψ( x , t ) has two complex components.