Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Exponential gain and self-bunching in a collective atomic recoil laser

R. Bonifacio, L. De Salvo, Lorenzo M. Narducci, E. J. D’Angelo

Published Aug 1, 1994• 175 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We show how a collection of noninverted two-level systems, under the action of a quasiresonant pump field, can produce an exponential amplification of a probe signal through the mechanism of a dynamical instability with spatial self-bunching in a way very similar to that experienced by a high-gain free-electron laser. We offer a detailed description of this phenomenon, specify the conditions under which it takes place, and sketch possible experimental parameters for its observation in a gaseous medium.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.50.1716

Related papers

Self-Organization, Broken Symmetry, and Lasing in an Atomic Vapor: The Interdependence of Gratings and Gain

Philip Hemmer, N. P. Bigelow, D. P. Katz +3 more

We describe a novel optical gain mechanism observed in a strongly driven Doppler-broadened atomic vapor. Gain and self-stabilizing laser oscillations are observed in a direction which is counterpropagating with respect to the traveling wave pump. Using Bragg diffraction, we show that the underlying gain-lasing mechanism is directly tied to a spontaneously formed optical wavelength grating. We suggest that this grating arises from a self-organization or self-bunching of the atoms, an effect which is mediated by recoil just as in the free electron laser.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 19, 1996•84 citations

Comparison of recoil-induced resonances and the collective atomic recoil laser

P. R. Berman

The theories of recoil-induced resonances (RIR) [J. Guo, P. R. Berman, B. Dubetsky, and G. Grynberg, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1426 (1992)] and the collective atomic recoil laser (CARL) [R. Bonifacio and L. De Salvo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 341, 360 (1994)] are compared. Both theories can be used to derive expressions for the gain experienced by a probe field interacting with an ensemble of two-level atoms that are simultaneously driven by a pump field. It is shown that the underlying formalisms of the RIR and CARL are equivalent. Differences between the RIR and CARL arise because the theories are typically applied for different ranges of the parameters appearing in the theory. The RIR limit is one in which the time derivative of the probe field amplitude, ${\mathrm{dE}}_{2}/dt,$ depends locally on ${E}_{2}(t)$ and the gain depends linearly on the atomic density, while the CARL limit is one in which ${\mathrm{dE}}_{2}/dt={\ensuremath{\int}}_{0}^{t}{f(t,t}^{\ensuremath{'}}{)E}_{2}{(t}^{\ensuremath{'}}{)dt}^{\ensuremath{'}},$ where f is a kernel, and the gain has a nonlinear dependence on the atomic density. Validity conditions for the RIR or CARL limits are established in terms of the various parameters characterizing the atom-field interaction. The probe gain for a probe-pump detuning equal to zero is analyzed in some detail, in order to understand how gain arises in a system which, at first glance, appears to have a symmetry that would preclude the possibility for gain. Moreover, it is shown that these calculations, carried out in perturbation theory, have a range of applicability beyond the recoil problem. Experimental possibilities for observing CARL are discussed.

arXiv:physics/9809002•Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1999•42 citations

Light Amplification in the Collective Atomic Recoil Laser(CARL)

Guojian Yang

We present a brief description of the collective atomic recoil laser, in contrast to the ordinary laser and free-electron laser. With a numerical solution to CARL equation, we reveal the amplification mechanism in CARL. Then we study the influence of some working parameters on CARL, which contributes to our later research.

Journal of Hunan University of Science and Engineering•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Self-distributed feedback lasing in a system of cold atoms

Brian W J McNeil, Gordon R. M. Robb, R. Bonifacio +1 more

We present a semiclassical analysis of lasing with an injected signal in a system of cold two-level atoms where the effects of atomic recoil are included self-consistently. This analysis predicts that the atoms may bunch under the effects of dipole forces to produce a density grating. This grating produces distributed feedback which can induce lasing action even when the gain of the atomic medium is less than the cavity losses.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Feb 1, 2000•2 citations

Recoil-induced gain and collective atomic recoil laser

Philippe Verkerk

Recoil-induced resonances have been observed in pump-probe spectroscopy with cold atoms. On the other hand, a model for collective atomic recoil laser has been developed by R. Bonifacio and co-workers. These two systems rely on the recoil effect due to the absorption or the emission of a photon by an atom and share may features. In this paper, we shall investigate the relationship between the two models and clarify the underlying physics. We'll review also the experimental results.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jul 14, 1998•0 citations

Steady states and instabilities of collective atomic recoil laser

Hong Yuan Ling, Han Pu, Leslie O. Baksmaty +1 more

Summary form only given. The collective atomic recoil laser (CARL) was proposed as an atomic analog of the free electron laser. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the CARL primarily because it can be regarded as a parametric amplifier for the momentum side modes. Our CARL model consists of a cavity CARL signal of wave number k/sub 1/, and an opposing non-depletion pump field of k/sub 2/, and a steady flow of an ultra-cold two-level atomic beam along a direction normal to the propagation of the fields. Both fields are assumed to be far-off resonance. A momentum change of /spl planck/K, where K = k/sub 1/ + k/sub 2/, takes place in each virtual two-photon process. This allows us to divide the total momentum space into different momentum families, and each momentum family into different diffraction groups.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Nov 13, 2002•0 citations
We show how a collection of noninverted two-level systems, under the action of a quasiresonant pump field, can produce an exponential amplification of a probe signal through the mechanism of a dynamical instability with spatial self-bunching in a way very similar to that experienced by a high-gain free-electron laser. We offer a detailed description of this phenomenon, specify the conditions under which it takes place, and sketch possible experimental parameters for its observation in a gaseous medium.
We describe a novel optical gain mechanism observed in a strongly driven Doppler-broadened atomic vapor. Gain and self-stabilizing laser oscillations are observed in a direction which is counterpropagating with respect to the traveling wave pump. Using Bragg diffraction, we show that the underlying gain-lasing mechanism is directly tied to a spontaneously formed optical wavelength grating. We suggest that this grating arises from a self-organization or self-bunching of the atoms, an effect which is mediated by recoil just as in the free electron laser.
The theories of recoil-induced resonances (RIR) [J. Guo, P. R. Berman, B. Dubetsky, and G. Grynberg, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1426 (1992)] and the collective atomic recoil laser (CARL) [R. Bonifacio and L. De Salvo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 341, 360 (1994)] are compared. Both theories can be used to derive expressions for the gain experienced by a probe field interacting with an ensemble of two-level atoms that are simultaneously driven by a pump field. It is shown that the underlying formalisms of the RIR and CARL are equivalent. Differences between the RIR and CARL arise because the theories are typically applied for different ranges of the parameters appearing in the theory. The RIR limit is one in which the time derivative of the probe field amplitude, dE2/dt,{\mathrm{dE}}_{2}/dt,dE2​/dt, depends locally on E2(t){E}_{2}(t)E2​(t) and the gain depends linearly on the atomic density, while the CARL limit is one in which ${\mathrm{dE}}_{2}/dt={\ensuremath{\int}}_{0}^{t}{f(t,t}^{\ensuremath{'}}{)E}_{2}{(t}^{\ensuremath{'}}{)dt}^{\ensuremath{'}},$ where f is a kernel, and the gain has a nonlinear dependence on the atomic density. Validity conditions for the RIR or CARL limits are established in terms of the various parameters characterizing the atom-field interaction. The probe gain for a probe-pump detuning equal to zero is analyzed in some detail, in order to understand how gain arises in a system which, at first glance, appears to have a symmetry that would preclude the possibility for gain. Moreover, it is shown that these calculations, carried out in perturbation theory, have a range of applicability beyond the recoil problem. Experimental possibilities for observing CARL are discussed.
Summary form only given. The collective atomic recoil laser (CARL) was proposed as an atomic analog of the free electron laser. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the CARL primarily because it can be regarded as a parametric amplifier for the momentum side modes. Our CARL model consists of a cavity CARL signal of wave number k/sub 1/, and an opposing non-depletion pump field of k/sub 2/, and a steady flow of an ultra-cold two-level atomic beam along a direction normal to the propagation of the fields. Both fields are assumed to be far-off resonance. A momentum change of /spl planck/K, where K = k/sub 1/ + k/sub 2/, takes place in each virtual two-photon process. This allows us to divide the total momentum space into different momentum families, and each momentum family into different diffraction groups.