Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Reliability of one-dimensional Dirichlet wave functions

Marco A. Núñez

Published Jun 1, 1995• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It has been recently proven that the bound states of the one-dimensional Schr\"odinger equation H${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{i})}$=${\mathit{E}}^{(\mathit{i})}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{i})}$ in [0,\ensuremath{\infty}) can be approximated by those of the corresponding Dirichlet eigenproblem ${\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{R}}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}$=${\mathit{E}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}$ in a finite box [0,R] when R\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. In this paper, we use a set of mathematical criteria that guarantee the correct calculation of expectation values in the frame of Hilbert spaces, to show that correct expectation values of most physical operators S are obtained by using the equation ${\mathrm{lim}}_{\mathit{R}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}$〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}$,S${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{j})}$〉= 〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{i})}$,S${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{j})}$〉, which includes operators not relatively form bounded by the Hamiltonian H. It is shown that standard numerical methods supply approximate wave functions ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{i})}$ for which the equation ${\mathrm{lim}}_{\mathit{m}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}$〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{i})}$,S${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{j})}$〉= 〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}$,S${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{j})}$〉 holds true. Thus, combining the previous limits we obtain a general approach to compute correct expectation values. It is shown how this approach agrees with the results found by other authors in special cases. In the particular case of computing approximate wave functions ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{i})}$ with the Ritz method, we show, analytically and numerically, that correct convergence toward the expectation values of high power of moment operators ${\mathit{r}}^{\mathit{k}}$ holds even when the basis functions have an analytic structure that substantially differs from that of the exact wave function.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.51.4381

Related papers

Computation of expectation values with Dirichlet one‐dimensional wave functions

Marco A. Núñez

Abstract Recently, it was proven that the wave functions ψ of one‐dimensional Schrödinger operators can be approximated by those ψn corresponding to the Dirichlet eigenproblem in a finite box sufficiently large. In this article, sufficient conditions to compute expectation values are used to prove that the expectation value 〈ψ, Sψ〉 can be approximated by 〈ψn, Sψn〉 as n → ∞, for a wide class of unbounded symmetric operators S. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 5, 1995•8 citations

A Critical Experiment on the Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Arthur E. Ruark

Consider a dynamical system with a single coordinate q, and energy E, and let [ represent the Schrodinger wave function of this system.It is commonly stated that the function

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Apr 1, 1928•1 citation

Some remarks on the integration of Schrödinger equation using the quantum stochastic calculus

Kalyanapuram Rangachari Parthasarathy

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1985•2 citations

Quantum particle in the wrong box (or: the perils of finite-dimensional approximations)

Felix Fischer, Daniel Klaus Burgarth, Davide Lonigro

When numerically simulating the unitary time evolution of an infinite-dimensional quantum system, one is usually led to treat the Hamiltonian H as an "infinite-dimensional matrix" by expressing it in some orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space, and then truncate it to some finite dimensions. However, the solutions of the Schrödinger equations generated by the truncated Hamiltonians need not converge, in general, to the solution of the Schrödinger equation corresponding to the actual Hamiltonian.In this paper we demonstrate that, under mild assumptions, they converge to the solution of the Schrödinger equation generated by a specific Hamiltonian which crucially depends on the particular choice of basis: the Friedrichs extension of the restriction of H to the space of finite linear combinations of elements of the basis. Importantly, this is generally different from H itself; in all such cases, numerical simulations will unavoidably reproduce the wrong dynamics in the limit, and yet there is no numerical test that can reveal this failure, unless one has the analytical solution to compare with.As a practical demonstration of such results, we consider the quantum particle in the box, and we show that, for a wide class of bases (which include associated Legendre polynomials as a concrete example) the dynamics generated by the truncated Hamiltonians will always converge to the one corresponding to the particle with Dirichlet boundary conditions, regardless the initial choice of boundary conditions. Other such examples are discussed.

arXiv:2412.15889•Quantum•Jan 27, 2026•1 citation

Momentum eigenfunctions in the complex momentum plane. V. Analytic behavior of the Schrödinger equation in the complex momentum plane. The Yukawa potential

Edwin N. Lassettre

A method for solution of the Schrödinger equation in momentum space is described. If the Schrodinger equation in momentum space is represented by Oχ=0, where O is an integral operator and χ is the momentum function, the method involves two steps: (i) the representation of χ as a rational function of P and (ii) expansion of Oχ in a power series in some appropriately chosen variable t (‖t‖≤1) which is a function of P. Equating to zero the coefficients of the first N powers of t (which determines the eigenvalues) makes Oχ differ from zero by terms of order tN. As N increases the eigenvalues approach the correct limiting values if the method converges. Within its circle of convergence a power series converges for both real and complex values of the variable and hence the Schrödinger equation, an integral equation, is forced to hold for both real and complex values of the variable. This is in contrast to variational methods which involve only real values of the independent variable. To test the method the motion of a particle in the field of a Yukawa potential is studied. Only the lowest energy state is considered. Two extreme cases, involving linear combinations of rational basis sets, are studied. Both basis sets are complete but the power series method converges only for one basis set. For the other set the power series method provides an eigenvalue which oscillates around the correct value without approaching a limit but a variation method using the same basis set converges rapidly to the correct eigenvalue. The variation method succeeds because the function is defined only on the real axis while the power series method fails because, in the complex plane, the basis set can only represent a meromorphic function (one whose only finite singular points are poles) and the momentum eigenfunction cannot be meromorphic. Thus the choice of a wrong basis set in a variation method can completely conceal the true analytic nature of an eigenfunction. It is shown that momentum eigenfunctions are not meromorphic because they possess branch points. This is true not only for the Yukawa potential but for several one-electron models including the Hartree–Fock equations.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 15, 1985•9 citations

On the Equivalence of Quantum Stochastics and A Dirac Boundary Value Problem, and an Inductive Stochastic Limit (New Development of Infinite-Dimensional Analysis and Quantum Probability)

V. P. Belavkin

数理解析研究所講究録•Apr 1, 2000•3 citations
It has been recently proven that the bound states of the one-dimensional Schr"odinger equation H\ensuremathψ(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψ(i)={\mathit{E}}^{(\mathit{i})}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{i})} in [0,\ensuremath{\infty}) can be approximated by those of the corresponding Dirichlet eigenproblem {\mathit{H}}_{\mathit{R}}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}={\mathit{E}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})} in a finite box [0,R] when R\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. In this paper, we use a set of mathematical criteria that guarantee the correct calculation of expectation values in the frame of Hilbert spaces, to show that correct expectation values of most physical operators S are obtained by using the equation limR\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞{\mathrm{lim}}_{\mathit{R}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}limR\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞​〈\ensuremathψR(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψR(i)​,S\ensuremathψR(j){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{j})}\ensuremathψR(j)​〉= 〈\ensuremathψ(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψ(i),S\ensuremathψ(j){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}^{(\mathit{j})}\ensuremathψ(j)〉, which includes operators not relatively form bounded by the Hamiltonian H. It is shown that standard numerical methods supply approximate wave functions \ensuremathψRm(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψRm(i)​ for which the equation limm\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞{\mathrm{lim}}_{\mathit{m}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\infty}}}limm\ensuremath→\ensuremath∞​〈\ensuremathψRm(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψRm(i)​,S\ensuremathψRm(j){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{j})}\ensuremathψRm(j)​〉= 〈\ensuremathψR(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψR(i)​,S\ensuremathψR(j){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}}^{(\mathit{j})}\ensuremathψR(j)​〉 holds true. Thus, combining the previous limits we obtain a general approach to compute correct expectation values. It is shown how this approach agrees with the results found by other authors in special cases. In the particular case of computing approximate wave functions \ensuremathψRm(i){\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}_{\mathit{R}\mathit{m}}^{(\mathit{i})}\ensuremathψRm(i)​ with the Ritz method, we show, analytically and numerically, that correct convergence toward the expectation values of high power of moment operators rk{\mathit{r}}^{\mathit{k}}rk holds even when the basis functions have an analytic structure that substantially differs from that of the exact wave function.
When numerically simulating the unitary time evolution of an infinite-dimensional quantum system, one is usually led to treat the Hamiltonian H as an "infinite-dimensional matrix" by expressing it in some orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space, and then truncate it to some finite dimensions. However, the solutions of the Schrödinger equations generated by the truncated Hamiltonians need not converge, in general, to the solution of the Schrödinger equation corresponding to the actual Hamiltonian.In this paper we demonstrate that, under mild assumptions, they converge to the solution of the Schrödinger equation generated by a specific Hamiltonian which crucially depends on the particular choice of basis: the Friedrichs extension of the restriction of H to the space of finite linear combinations of elements of the basis. Importantly, this is generally different from H itself; in all such cases, numerical simulations will unavoidably reproduce the wrong dynamics in the limit, and yet there is no numerical test that can reveal this failure, unless one has the analytical solution to compare with.As a practical demonstration of such results, we consider the quantum particle in the box, and we show that, for a wide class of bases (which include associated Legendre polynomials as a concrete example) the dynamics generated by the truncated Hamiltonians will always converge to the one corresponding to the particle with Dirichlet boundary conditions, regardless the initial choice of boundary conditions. Other such examples are discussed.
A method for solution of the Schrödinger equation in momentum space is described. If the Schrodinger equation in momentum space is represented by Oχ=0, where O is an integral operator and χ is the momentum function, the method involves two steps: (i) the representation of χ as a rational function of P and (ii) expansion of Oχ in a power series in some appropriately chosen variable t (‖t‖≤1) which is a function of P. Equating to zero the coefficients of the first N powers of t (which determines the eigenvalues) makes Oχ differ from zero by terms of order tN. As N increases the eigenvalues approach the correct limiting values if the method converges. Within its circle of convergence a power series converges for both real and complex values of the variable and hence the Schrödinger equation, an integral equation, is forced to hold for both real and complex values of the variable. This is in contrast to variational methods which involve only real values of the independent variable. To test the method the motion of a particle in the field of a Yukawa potential is studied. Only the lowest energy state is considered. Two extreme cases, involving linear combinations of rational basis sets, are studied. Both basis sets are complete but the power series method converges only for one basis set. For the other set the power series method provides an eigenvalue which oscillates around the correct value without approaching a limit but a variation method using the same basis set converges rapidly to the correct eigenvalue. The variation method succeeds because the function is defined only on the real axis while the power series method fails because, in the complex plane, the basis set can only represent a meromorphic function (one whose only finite singular points are poles) and the momentum eigenfunction cannot be meromorphic. Thus the choice of a wrong basis set in a variation method can completely conceal the true analytic nature of an eigenfunction. It is shown that momentum eigenfunctions are not meromorphic because they possess branch points. This is true not only for the Yukawa potential but for several one-electron models including the Hartree–Fock equations.