Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica Scripta

Quantum Optical Studies of Tunneling and other Superluminal Phenomena

R. Y. Chiao, Aephraim M. Steinberg

Published Jan 1, 1998• 18 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Experiments at Berkeley and elsewhere which show that the process of tunneling is apparently superluminal will be reviewed. Conflicting theories for the tunneling time will be compared with experiment. The tunneling particle in the Berkeley experiments was the photon. The measurement of the tunneling time utilized a two-photon light source (spontaneous parametric down-conversion), a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, and a coincidence counter of photon pairs. The tunnel barrier consisted of a photonic-bandgap medium excited at midgap. We find that the peak of a tunneling single-photon wave packet appeared on the far side of the barrier 1.47 ± 0.21 fs earlier than the peak of a wave packet which traveled an equal distance in air. Group velocities which exceed c can also occur in transparent media with inverted atomic populations. Tachyon-like excitations, i.e., collective normal modes of atoms coupled to electromagnetic radiation which possess tachyon-like dispersion relations, occur in these media. However, relativistic causality is not violated by any of these superluminal phenomena.

DOI
10.1238/physica.topical.076a00061

Related papers

Tunneling times and superluminality: a tutorial

R. Y. Chiao

Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment.

arXiv:quant-ph/9811019•Mysteries, Puzzles, and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics•Jan 1, 1999•3 citations

Tunneling Times and Superluminality: a Tutorial

R. Y. Chiao

Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment. An introduction to an introduction Tunneling, the quantum mechanical process by which a particle can penetrate a classically forbidden region of space, is one of the most mysterious phenomena of quantum mechanics. Yet it is one of the most basic and important processes in Nature, without which we could not even exist, for tunneling is involved in the very first step of the nuclear reaction, p + p → d + e + νe, which powers the Sun, the source of energy for life on the Earth. ∗ On appointment as a Miller Research Professor in the Miller Institute for Basic Research

•Jan 1, 1999•15 citations

Measurement of the single-photon tunneling time

Aephraim M. Steinberg, Paul G. Kwiat, R. Y. Chiao

Using a two-photon interferometer, we have measured the time delay for a photon to tunnel across a barrier consisting of a 1.1-\ensuremath{\mu}m-thick 1D photonic band-gap material. The peak of the photon wave packet appears on the far side of the barrier 1.47\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.21 fs earlier than it would if it were to travel at the vacuum speed of light c. Although the apparent tunneling velocity (1.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.2)c is superluminal, this is not a genuine signal velocity, and Einstein causality is not violated. The measured tunneling time is consistent with the group delay (``phase time''), but not with the semiclassical time.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 2, 1993•837 citations

Explanation of Superluminal Phenomena Based on Wave-Particle Duality and Proposed Optical Experiments

Hai-Long Zhao

An explanation for superluminal phenomena based on wave-particle duality of photons is suggested. A single photon may be regarded as a wave packet, whose spatial extension is its coherence volume. As a photon propagates as a wave train in vacuum, its velocity is just the speed of light. When it tunnels through a barrier as a particle, its wave function collapses and it will travel faster than light. Superluminal motion can occur only within the coherence length and the time constrained by uncertainty principle. A massive particle cannot be superluminal during the tunneling process. So superluminality does not violate causality. As for the superluminal and negative group velocities in anomalously dispersive medium, they are merely reshaping effect of the pulse, and they will become subluminal at large distances. A couple of experiments are proposed to test the superluminal phenomena.

arXiv:1405.3364•May 14, 2014•0 citations

On Superluminal Photonic Tunnelling

Günter Nimtz, Astrid Haibel, A. A. Stahlhofen

Evanescent modes or the tunnelling process are characterized by an imaginary wave number. These special solutions of the Helmholtz and of the Schrödinger equations first noticed in connection with the total reflection were said to have no physical meaning about 200 years ago. Last century the tunnelling problem in quantum mechanics has been described by the phase time approach. The phase time approach yields the group velocity of a wave packet (see e.g. Hartman, 1962). Nowadays the phase time approach is used in network analyzers to determine the group velocity of an electromagnetic wave in devices. We have reported about superluminal signal velocities in photonic tunnelling. It was observed that the superluminal photonic tunnelling time data measured in the time domain are in agreement with the calculated phase time data. This result is also in agreement with the definition of the barrier transition time given in the Federal Standard 1037 C (NTIA, USA 2000). Thus we have added further credibility to the assumption that the photonic tunnelling results are representative for quantum mechanical tunnelling of particles.

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks•Dec 23, 2005•2 citations

Superluminal (but causal) propagation of wave packets in transparent media with inverted atomic populations

R. Y. Chiao

The propagation of limited-bandwidth signals, such as Gaussian wave packets, tuned to a transparent spectral region far below the resonance of an inverted two-level atomic medium, can be superluminal, i.e., with phase, group, and energy velocities all exceeding the vacuum speed of light c. Causality is not violated, however. Little distortion and gain can accompany this propagation.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1993•249 citations
Experiments at Berkeley and elsewhere which show that the process of tunneling is apparently superluminal will be reviewed. Conflicting theories for the tunneling time will be compared with experiment. The tunneling particle in the Berkeley experiments was the photon. The measurement of the tunneling time utilized a two-photon light source (spontaneous parametric down-conversion), a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, and a coincidence counter of photon pairs. The tunnel barrier consisted of a photonic-bandgap medium excited at midgap. We find that the peak of a tunneling single-photon wave packet appeared on the far side of the barrier 1.47 ± 0.21 fs earlier than the peak of a wave packet which traveled an equal distance in air. Group velocities which exceed c can also occur in transparent media with inverted atomic populations. Tachyon-like excitations, i.e., collective normal modes of atoms coupled to electromagnetic radiation which possess tachyon-like dispersion relations, occur in these media. However, relativistic causality is not violated by any of these superluminal phenomena.
Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment.
Experiments have shown that individual photons penetrate an optical tunnel barrier with an effective group velocity considerably greater than the vacuum speed of light. The experiments were conducted with a two-photon parametric down-conversion light source, which produced correlated, but random, emissions of photon pairs. The two photons of a given pair were emitted in slightly different directions so that one photon passed through the tunnel barrier, while the other photon passed through the vacuum. The time delay for the tunneling photon relative to its twin was measured by adjusting the path length difference between the two photons in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer, in order to achieve coincidence detection. We found that the photon transit time through the barrier was smaller than the twin photon’s transit time through an equal distance in vacuum, indicating that the process of tunneling in quantum mechanics is superluminal. Various conflicting theories of tunneling times are compared with experiment. An introduction to an introduction Tunneling, the quantum mechanical process by which a particle can penetrate a classically forbidden region of space, is one of the most mysterious phenomena of quantum mechanics. Yet it is one of the most basic and important processes in Nature, without which we could not even exist, for tunneling is involved in the very first step of the nuclear reaction, p + p → d + e + νe, which powers the Sun, the source of energy for life on the Earth. ∗ On appointment as a Miller Research Professor in the Miller Institute for Basic Research
Using a two-photon interferometer, we have measured the time delay for a photon to tunnel across a barrier consisting of a 1.1-\ensuremath{\mu}m-thick 1D photonic band-gap material. The peak of the photon wave packet appears on the far side of the barrier 1.47\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.21 fs earlier than it would if it were to travel at the vacuum speed of light c. Although the apparent tunneling velocity (1.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.2)c is superluminal, this is not a genuine signal velocity, and Einstein causality is not violated. The measured tunneling time is consistent with the group delay (``phase time''), but not with the semiclassical time.
An explanation for superluminal phenomena based on wave-particle duality of photons is suggested. A single photon may be regarded as a wave packet, whose spatial extension is its coherence volume. As a photon propagates as a wave train in vacuum, its velocity is just the speed of light. When it tunnels through a barrier as a particle, its wave function collapses and it will travel faster than light. Superluminal motion can occur only within the coherence length and the time constrained by uncertainty principle. A massive particle cannot be superluminal during the tunneling process. So superluminality does not violate causality. As for the superluminal and negative group velocities in anomalously dispersive medium, they are merely reshaping effect of the pulse, and they will become subluminal at large distances. A couple of experiments are proposed to test the superluminal phenomena.
Evanescent modes or the tunnelling process are characterized by an imaginary wave number. These special solutions of the Helmholtz and of the Schrödinger equations first noticed in connection with the total reflection were said to have no physical meaning about 200 years ago. Last century the tunnelling problem in quantum mechanics has been described by the phase time approach. The phase time approach yields the group velocity of a wave packet (see e.g. Hartman, 1962). Nowadays the phase time approach is used in network analyzers to determine the group velocity of an electromagnetic wave in devices. We have reported about superluminal signal velocities in photonic tunnelling. It was observed that the superluminal photonic tunnelling time data measured in the time domain are in agreement with the calculated phase time data. This result is also in agreement with the definition of the barrier transition time given in the Federal Standard 1037 C (NTIA, USA 2000). Thus we have added further credibility to the assumption that the photonic tunnelling results are representative for quantum mechanical tunnelling of particles.