As a novel evolutionary algorithm, a quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm (QIEA) is attracting increasing attention, due to its good global search capability and rapid convergence. A quantum rotation gate (QR-gate) is the key operator in a QIEA. In the literature, there are many versions of QR-gates. How to evaluate and choose a QR-gate is very worth discussing. This paper focuses on a comparison and analysis on six QR-gates. The performances of QIEAs with the six QR-gates are tested on a practical problem, image sparse decomposition. Experimental results show that the QR-gate5 is superior to other five versions of QR-gates in terms of the quality of solutions and computing time.
As a novel evolutionary algorithm, a quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm (QIEA) is attracting increasing attention, due to its good global search capability and rapid convergence. A quantum rotation gate (QR-gate) is the key operator in a QIEA. In the literature, there are many versions of QR-gates. How to evaluate and choose a QR-gate is very worth discussing. This paper focuses on a comparison and analysis on six QR-gates. The performances of QIEAs with the six QR-gates are tested on a practical problem, image sparse decomposition. Experimental results show that the QR-gate5 is superior to other five versions of QR-gates in terms of the quality of solutions and computing time.
We investigate two modified Quantum Evolutionary methods for solving real value problems. The Quantum Inspired Evolutionary Algorithms (QIEA) were originally used for solving binary encoded problems and their signature features follow superposition of multiple states on a quantum bit and a rotation gate. In order to apply this paradigm to real value problems, we propose two quantum methods Half Significant Bit (HSB) and Stepwise Real QEA (SRQEA), developed using binary and real encoding respectively, while keeping close to the original quantum computing metaphor. We evaluate our approaches against sets of multimodal mathematical test functions and real world problems, using five performance metrics and include comparisons to published results. We report the issues encountered while implementing some of the published real QIEA techniques. Our methods focus on introducing and implementing new rotation gate operators used for evolution, including a novel mechanism for preventing premature convergence in the binary algorithm. The applied performance metrics show superior results for our quantum methods on most of the test problems (especially for the more complex and challenging ones), demonstrating faster convergence and accuracy.
Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Algorithms (QIEAs) represent a novel fusion of quantum computing principles and classical evolutionary strategies, offering a powerful approach to solving complex optimization problems. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview, detailing foundational concepts, implementation techniques, and potential applications of QIEAs. By leveraging quantum phenomena such as superposition and entanglement, QIEAs enhance the exploitation and exploration capabilities of traditional evolutionary algorithms (EAs), thus enabling an efficient search of vast solution spaces. The study examines key components of QIEA, including quantum encoding, rotation gates, and entanglement operations, and compares its performance with classical EAs. By analyzing real-life examples of combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) such as the minimum spanning tree (MST), traveling salesman problem (TSP), and graph coloring, the chapter demonstrates QIEA’s superior efficiency and solution quality. Despite implementation challenges, QIEA shows promise in various domains, including machine learning, finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and e-commerce. Future research directions are outlined, emphasizing the need for simplified quantum-inspired operators, hybrid quantum-classical systems, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This chapter highlights the transformative potential of QIEA, setting the stage for further advancements and applications in optimization and computational efficiency.
Quantum computers are seen as the next generation computing technique with the processing power potential they have. However, currently, quantum computers are limited in terms of hardware and algorithmic capabilities. In this study, quantum-inspired methods which are formed by combining quantum computation techniques with classical algorithms are focused on. It has been emphasized in many studies that quantum-inspired methods provide advantages especially for metaheuristic methods. Different from them, in this study, the performance of population-based quantum-inspired methods are compared. The paper focuses on solving the same optimization problem by using quantum-inspired versions of the population-based optimization algorithms such as evolutionary algorithm, genetic algorithm, and differential evolution algorithm. The experimental results show that, while Quantum-inspired Evolutionary Algorithm is better at global search, Quantum-inspired Differential Evolution Algorithm is better at local search and more accurate results.
Genetic Quantum Algorithm (GQA) is an evolutionary algorithm in the class of quantum inspired evolutionary algorithms inspired by the principles of quantum computing such as Q-bits, super position, quantum gates, interference and coherence. GQA adopts Q-bit representation and applies quantum rotation gate (QR gate) as genetic operator. The performance of the quantum inspired evolutionary algorithms largely depends upon the effectiveness of quantum gates applied as the genetic operator. Researchers have attempted to improve the performance of quantum inspired evolutionary algorithms by designing various quantum evolutionary operators using different strategies. In this paper, an effort is made to study the impact of Random search based QR gate strategy in GQA, and subsequently a Random search and greedy selection based Genetic Quantum Algorithm (RSGS-GQA) is proposed. The performance of RSGS-GQA algorithm is compared with the standard quantum inspired evolutionary algorithms (QIEA) on knapsack problem. The results indicate that, the RSGS-GQA algorithm performs better than the standard QIEA variants in terms of the quality of the solution and convergence.
From recent research on combinatorial optimization of the knapsack problem, quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm (QEA) was proved to be better than conventional genetic algorithms. To improve the performance of the QEA, this paper proposes research issues on QEA such as a termination criterion, a Q-gate, and a two-phase scheme, for a class of numerical and combinatorial optimization problems. A new termination criterion is proposed which gives a clearer meaning on the convergence of Q-bit individuals. A novel variation operator H/sub /spl epsi// gate, which is a modified version of the rotation gate, is proposed along with a two-phase QEA scheme based on the analysis of the effect of changing the initial conditions of Q-bits of the Q-bit individual in the first phase. To demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the updated QEA, several experiments are carried out on a class of numerical and combinatorial optimization problems. The results show that the updated QEA makes QEA more powerful than the previous QEA in terms of convergence speed, fitness, and robustness.
Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms (QIEAs), as a subset of evolutionary computation, are based on the principles of quantum computing such as quantum bits and quantum superposition. In this paper, we propose a multi-start quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm, called MSQIEA. To improve the performance of the algorithm, a multi-measurement operator and a new strategy for updating the rotation angle is proposed. When Q-bit individuals start to converge to their final states, the best solution is stored and all Q-bits in each Q-bit individual are reinitialized. We compare the effectiveness of MSQIEA with a popular quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm, called QEA, for solving 0-1 knapsack problem. The experimental results show that MSQIEA outperforms QEA and finds a solution with higher profit.