Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Contemporary Psychology

Mechanisms of Nonlocality and Its Implications to Physics and the Study of ConsciousnessMechanisms of Nonlocality and Its Implications to Physics and the Study of Consciousness

Simon M. McCrea

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1037/a0011592

Related papers

On the Quantum Mechanics of Consciousness, with Application to Anomalous Phenomena

R. G. Jahn, Brenda J. Dunne

EXPLORE•May 1, 2007•0 citations

Perceived Reality, Quantum Mechanics, and Consciousness

Subhash C. Kak, Deepak Chopra, Menas C. Kafatos

Our sense of reality is different from its mathematical basis as given by physical theories. Although nature at its deepest level is quantum mechanical and nonlocal, it appears to our minds in everyday experience as local and classical. Since the same laws should govern all phenomena, we propose this difference in the nature of perceived reality is due to the principle of veiled nonlocality that is associated with consciousness. Veiled nonlocality allows consciousness to operate and present what we experience as objective reality. In other words, this principle allows us to consider consciousness indirectly, in terms of how consciousness operates. We consider different theoretical models commonly used in physics and neuroscience to describe veiled nonlocality. Furthermore, if consciousness as an entity leaves a physical trace, then laboratory searches for such a trace should be sought for in nonlocality, where probabilities do not conform to local expectations.

•Jan 1, 2014•10 citations

On the quantum mechanics of consciousness, with application to anomalous phenomena

R. G. Jahn, Brenda J. Dunne

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 1986•147 citations

What’s It Like to Be a Universe: Implications of Being In, Of, and About a Brain, or a Speculative Panconsciousness Approach to Quantum Nonlocality

David Gruber

ABSTRACT The problem of quantum nonlocality references instantaneous entanglements happening between particles at great distances, putting under question physical assumptions about time and local effects. Despite a wide range of proposed solutions in physics, the problem persists; however, due to the recent interest in panconsciousness and panpsychism in philosophy as well as numerous suggestions that consciousness and quantum physics are intimately related, I argue in favor of thinking strange quantum effects—and nonlocality as case in point—in lieu of conscious activity happening at a universal scale. Drawing on the mind-brain problem or “the hard problem” as an intellectual resource and particularly pertinent metaphor in the case helps to illuminate the argument; briefly stated, I argue that a conscious universe eliminates the necessity of thinking distance as a problem needing to be resolved to comprehend disparate physical observations. In other words, I offer a speculative vision for quantum nonlocality and ultimately aim to encourage scholars to more carefully consider what it is like to be In, Of, and About a brain when thinking about the universe.

The Journal of Speculative Philosophy•Aug 1, 2022•0 citations

Reality Begins with Consciousness: A Paradigm Shift That Works

Michael Potts

REALITY BEGINS WITH CONSCIOUSNESS: A PARADIGM SHIFT THAT WORKS (E-book) by Vernon M. Neppe and Edward R. Close. 2nd edition. At: brainvoyage. com, March 2012. Vernon Neppe and Edward Close's book Reality Begins With is an interesting exercise in speculative metaphysics by two physicists. However, this is not the way they envision their work--they consider it a meta-paradigm that has philosophical implications but which belongs in the realm of science. Theoretical physicists are fond of writing philosophical metaphysics in the name of science, for example, David Bohm (1980), Amit Goswami (1995), and Fred Alan Wolf (2011). These physicists usually make use of the alleged implications of quantum mechanics to make broad claims about the nature of reality as a whole: reality is inconnected, everything is one, made the physical world, or we made the physical world. An alternate approach is offered by the biologist Rupert Sheldrake in his theory of resonance, a view with affinities to the philosophical theory of forms, although unlike Plato and Aristotle's forms, his morphic are dynamic and evolving. What these systems have in common is a tendency toward metaphysical monism (often in some version of panpsychism or pantheism). The physics-based systems use nonlocality enshrined in Bell's Theorem in quantum mechanics to assert the interconnectedness of all things. Sheldrake's fields perform a similar role. The physics-based systems focus on the role that consciousness plays in quantum mechanics and assert a strong causal role for consciousness in the formation and functioning of the universe. Neppe, a neuropsychiatrist, and Close, a physicist, have developed what they label a metaparadigm, which is a large-scale research program for the scientific enterprise. Their program is in the general tradition of metaphysical monistic systems that are based on alleged implications of quantum mechanics, although it is broader in scope. For those interested in psi, they discuss in detail how their theory allows psi phenomena to occur. The authors label their paradigm the Triadic Dimensional-Distinction Vortical Paradigm model (TDVP) (Neppe, Author's Preface). This begins one of the chief difficulties with understanding their work--the number of neologisms. Neologisms may be justified, and a revolutionary theory may require multiple neologisms, but when they are used they should be sufficiently clear. Neppe and Close's stipulative definitions of their neologisms are often no clearer than the neologisms themselves. The authors use so many neologisms because they believe that introducing consciousness into the science of nature changes the paradigm that has dominated science since the 17th-century scientific revolution. Their model posits a unified reality of space-time-consciousness. Reality is an infinite unity, nonlocal on a finite level, [existing] as a reality essence (a metareality) involving a persuasive consciousness (information expressed through meaning as metaconsciousness) and order (ordropy [another neologism, M.R--ordropy is defined as the opposite of entropy]) with metalife (all encompassing life in the infinite: potential life--polife)--which then manifests as physical life in the finite when linked with the correct current physiology. (p. 2) Now nonlocality is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, and the view that the universe is infinite may or may not be correct, but it is a defensible philosophical position (Neppe and Close's interpretation of infinity will be discussed below). Metaconsciousness is unclear. The system posits consciousness at the lowest levels of reality, including inanimate objects. It is difficult to understand what it means for a subatomic particle in a rock to be conscious. Consciousness is notoriously difficult to define, but Thomas Nagel makes sense when he states: But fundamentally an has conscious mental states if and only if there is something that it is to be that organism--something it is like for the organism (Nagel, 1974, p. …

Journal of Parapsychology•Sep 22, 2012•10 citations

Nonlocal Phenomenology Without Nonlocal Physics: A Speculative Model of Quantum Correlation and Conscious Interpretation

MR Martin

•Dec 8, 2025•0 citations
Our sense of reality is different from its mathematical basis as given by physical theories. Although nature at its deepest level is quantum mechanical and nonlocal, it appears to our minds in everyday experience as local and classical. Since the same laws should govern all phenomena, we propose this difference in the nature of perceived reality is due to the principle of veiled nonlocality that is associated with consciousness. Veiled nonlocality allows consciousness to operate and present what we experience as objective reality. In other words, this principle allows us to consider consciousness indirectly, in terms of how consciousness operates. We consider different theoretical models commonly used in physics and neuroscience to describe veiled nonlocality. Furthermore, if consciousness as an entity leaves a physical trace, then laboratory searches for such a trace should be sought for in nonlocality, where probabilities do not conform to local expectations.
ABSTRACT The problem of quantum nonlocality references instantaneous entanglements happening between particles at great distances, putting under question physical assumptions about time and local effects. Despite a wide range of proposed solutions in physics, the problem persists; however, due to the recent interest in panconsciousness and panpsychism in philosophy as well as numerous suggestions that consciousness and quantum physics are intimately related, I argue in favor of thinking strange quantum effects—and nonlocality as case in point—in lieu of conscious activity happening at a universal scale. Drawing on the mind-brain problem or “the hard problem” as an intellectual resource and particularly pertinent metaphor in the case helps to illuminate the argument; briefly stated, I argue that a conscious universe eliminates the necessity of thinking distance as a problem needing to be resolved to comprehend disparate physical observations. In other words, I offer a speculative vision for quantum nonlocality and ultimately aim to encourage scholars to more carefully consider what it is like to be In, Of, and About a brain when thinking about the universe.
REALITY BEGINS WITH CONSCIOUSNESS: A PARADIGM SHIFT THAT WORKS (E-book) by Vernon M. Neppe and Edward R. Close. 2nd edition. At: brainvoyage. com, March 2012. Vernon Neppe and Edward Close's book Reality Begins With is an interesting exercise in speculative metaphysics by two physicists. However, this is not the way they envision their work--they consider it a meta-paradigm that has philosophical implications but which belongs in the realm of science. Theoretical physicists are fond of writing philosophical metaphysics in the name of science, for example, David Bohm (1980), Amit Goswami (1995), and Fred Alan Wolf (2011). These physicists usually make use of the alleged implications of quantum mechanics to make broad claims about the nature of reality as a whole: reality is inconnected, everything is one, made the physical world, or we made the physical world. An alternate approach is offered by the biologist Rupert Sheldrake in his theory of resonance, a view with affinities to the philosophical theory of forms, although unlike Plato and Aristotle's forms, his morphic are dynamic and evolving. What these systems have in common is a tendency toward metaphysical monism (often in some version of panpsychism or pantheism). The physics-based systems use nonlocality enshrined in Bell's Theorem in quantum mechanics to assert the interconnectedness of all things. Sheldrake's fields perform a similar role. The physics-based systems focus on the role that consciousness plays in quantum mechanics and assert a strong causal role for consciousness in the formation and functioning of the universe. Neppe, a neuropsychiatrist, and Close, a physicist, have developed what they label a metaparadigm, which is a large-scale research program for the scientific enterprise. Their program is in the general tradition of metaphysical monistic systems that are based on alleged implications of quantum mechanics, although it is broader in scope. For those interested in psi, they discuss in detail how their theory allows psi phenomena to occur. The authors label their paradigm the Triadic Dimensional-Distinction Vortical Paradigm model (TDVP) (Neppe, Author's Preface). This begins one of the chief difficulties with understanding their work--the number of neologisms. Neologisms may be justified, and a revolutionary theory may require multiple neologisms, but when they are used they should be sufficiently clear. Neppe and Close's stipulative definitions of their neologisms are often no clearer than the neologisms themselves. The authors use so many neologisms because they believe that introducing consciousness into the science of nature changes the paradigm that has dominated science since the 17th-century scientific revolution. Their model posits a unified reality of space-time-consciousness. Reality is an infinite unity, nonlocal on a finite level, [existing] as a reality essence (a metareality) involving a persuasive consciousness (information expressed through meaning as metaconsciousness) and order (ordropy [another neologism, M.R--ordropy is defined as the opposite of entropy]) with metalife (all encompassing life in the infinite: potential life--polife)--which then manifests as physical life in the finite when linked with the correct current physiology. (p. 2) Now nonlocality is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, and the view that the universe is infinite may or may not be correct, but it is a defensible philosophical position (Neppe and Close's interpretation of infinity will be discussed below). Metaconsciousness is unclear. The system posits consciousness at the lowest levels of reality, including inanimate objects. It is difficult to understand what it means for a subatomic particle in a rock to be conscious. Consciousness is notoriously difficult to define, but Thomas Nagel makes sense when he states: But fundamentally an has conscious mental states if and only if there is something that it is to be that organism--something it is like for the organism (Nagel, 1974, p. …