Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

FROM THE QUBIT TO THE QUANTUM SEARCH ALGORITHMS

Gianfranco Cariolaro, Tommaso Occhipinti

Published Dec 1, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812779458_0033

Related papers

QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ALGORITHMS

Mr. K. Suresh Babu Dr. T. P. Anish Dr. Cornelius K

•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

CIRCUIT-BASED QUANTUM ALGORITHMS

BAO JINGE

•Mar 8, 2024•0 citations

QUANTUM COMPUTING: ALGORITHMS, APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE ASPECTS

Mrs. Sri Lavanya Sajja Dr. L. Sherly Puspha Annabel Dr. Chatrapathy K

•Mar 10, 2026•0 citations

Quantum computing and quantum search algorithms

Zijian Diao, Goong Chen

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

QUANTUM AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS AS A NEW TECHNOLOGY OF EVOLUTIONARY SEARCH

Victor M. Kureichik

Vestnik Yuzhnogo nauchnogo tsentra•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

LIMITATIONS OF SOME SIMPLE ADIABATIC QUANTUM ALGORITHMS

Lawrence M. Ioannou, Michele Mosca

Let H(t) = (1 - t/T)H0 + (t/T)H1, t ∈ [0,T], be the Hamiltonian governing an adiabatic quantum algorithm, where H0 is diagonal in the Hadamard basis and H1 is diagonal in the computational basis. We prove that H0 and H1 must each have at least two large mutually-orthogonal eigenspaces if the algorithm's running time is to be subexponential in the number of qubits. We also reproduce the optimality proof of Farhi and Gutmann's search algorithm in the context of this adiabatic scheme; because we only consider initial Hamiltonians that are diagonal in the Hadamard basis, our result is slightly stronger than the original.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702241•International Journal of Quantum Information•Jun 1, 2008•11 citations
Let H(t) = (1 - t/T)H0 + (t/T)H1, t ∈ [0,T], be the Hamiltonian governing an adiabatic quantum algorithm, where H0 is diagonal in the Hadamard basis and H1 is diagonal in the computational basis. We prove that H0 and H1 must each have at least two large mutually-orthogonal eigenspaces if the algorithm's running time is to be subexponential in the number of qubits. We also reproduce the optimality proof of Farhi and Gutmann's search algorithm in the context of this adiabatic scheme; because we only consider initial Hamiltonians that are diagonal in the Hadamard basis, our result is slightly stronger than the original.