Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics

Slowing light in χ(2) photonic crystals

Giuseppe D’Aguanno, Marco Centini, Michael Scalora, Concita Sibilia, M. Bertolotti, E. Fazio, C. M. Bowden, Mark J. Bloemer

Published Oct 28, 2003• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A study of parametric nonlinear frequency down-conversion in photonic crystals reveals that under suitable conditions the probe field can be slowed down to approximately 11 m/s. The effect arises as a result of the simultaneous availability of global phase-matching conditions, field localization, and gain experienced by the probe beam. Together, these effects conspire to yield tunneling velocities previously reported only for coherently resonant interactions, i.e., electromagnetic induced transparency, in Bose-Einstein condensates, hot atomic gases, and doped crystals.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.68.046613

Related papers

Trapping and storing light in χ(2) photonic crystals

Giuseppe D’Aguanno

A study of parametric down-conversion in photonic crystals reveals that the probe field can be slowed down to 11m/s: i.e. a tunneling velocity previously reported only for coherently resonant interactions in Bose-Einstein condensates.

Frontiers in Optics•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Giant nonlinearities via simultaneous electromagnetically- and self-induced transparencies in doped photonic crystals

Gershon Kurizki, David Petrosyan

This paper studies a strong modulation of the phase of a weak pulse subject to electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) by a control pulse in the form of an self-induced transparency (SIT) gap soliton (GS) moving at the same slow velocity. The aim of this work is to match the group velocities of the weak probe field subject to EIT and the free-propagating field having the form of a slow SIT GS.

European Quantum Electronics Conference (EQEC)•Nov 15, 2004•0 citations

Giant nonlinearities via simultaneous electromagnetically- and self-induced transparencies in doped photonic crystals

Gershon Kurizki, David Petrosyan

Photonic crystals doped with resonant atoms allow for an efficient cross-coupling between pulses exhibiting electromagnetically induced transparency and self-induced transparency gap solitons. These features may find applications in high-fidelity classical and quantum optical communications.

Nonlinear Guided Waves and Their Applications•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Slow light

Robert W. Boyd, Ortwin G. Hess, Cornelia Denz +1 more

Research into slow light began theoretically in 1880 with the paper [1] of H A Lorentz, who is best known for his work on relativity and the speed of light. Experimental work started some 60 years later with the work of S L McCall and E L Hahn [2] who explored non-linear self-induced transparency in ruby. This field of research has burgeoned in the last 10 years, starting with the work of L Vestergaard Hau and coworkers on slow light via electromagnetically induced transparency in a Bose–Einstein condensate [3]. Many groups are now able to slow light down to a few metres per second or even stop the motion of light entirely [4]. Today, slow light – or more often `slow and fast light' – has become its own vibrant field with a strongly increasing number of publications. In broad scope, slow light research can be categorized in terms of the sort of physical mechanism used to slow down the light. One sort of slow light makes use of material dispersion. This dispersion can be the natural dispersion of the ordinary refractive index or can be the frequency dependence of some nonlinear optical process, such as electromagnetically induced transparency, coherent population oscillations, stimulated light scattering, or four-wave mixing processes. The second sort of slow light makes use of the wavelength dependence of artificially structured materials, such as photonic crystals, optical waveguides, and collections of microresonators. Material systems in which slow light has been observed include metal vapours, rare-earth-doped materials, Raman and Brillioun gain media, photonic crystals, microresonators and, more recently, metamaterials. A common feature of all of these schemes is the presence of a sharp single resonance or multiple resonances produced by an atomic transition, a resonance in a photonic structure, or in a nonlinear optical process. Current applications of slow light include a series of attractive topics in optical information processing, such as optical data storage, optical memories, quantum information devices, and optical communication systems in which the use of slow light will allow all-optical processing with less wasted heat. To implement these applications, devices such as buffers, memories, interferometers and switches that utilize slow light need to be developed. Future challenges include the need for improved coupling of light into slow light modes, overcoming propagation losses, and mitigating the influence of large dispersion of the group velocity. The collection of papers in this special issue of Journal of Optics features a broad spectrum of articles that highlight actual developments in many of the material types and schemes described above. It represents therefore an excellent up to date snapshot of the current state of the field of slow light research. References [1] Lorentz H A 1880 Uber die Beziehung zwischen der Fortpflanzung des Lichtes und der Körperdichte Wiedemann Ann. 9 641–64 [2] McCall S L and Hahn E L 1967 Self-induced transparency by pulsed coherent light Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 908–11 [3] Vestergaard Hau L, Harris S E, Dutton Z and Behroozi C H 1999 Nature 397 594 [4] Philips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L and Lukin M D 2001 Storage of light in atomic vapor Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783–6

Journal of Optics•Sep 24, 2010•6 citations

Combining slow-light and carrier induced nonlinearities in photonic crystal nanocavities

Kamel Bencheikh, Alejandro M. Yacomotti, P. Grinberg +4 more

Summary form only given. We implement coherent population oscillation and carrier-induced nonlinear refractive index in a semiconductor active nanocavity to strongly increase the photonic lifetime and manipulate its optical response.The so-called photonic crystal L3 cavity, given by three missing holes in a 2D photonic crystal (2D-PhC), is an emblematic illustration of a nanocavity with strong light confinement due to high-Q resonance and small mode volume [1]. Strong electronic confinement can also be achieved provided the cavity contains active semiconductor nanostructures such as quantum wells (QWs) or dots. These two effects lead to the enhancement of the light-matter interaction and, potentially, to a modification of photonic, electronic and thermal characteristic times. Thus, semiconductor 2D-PhC L3 nanocavities are excellent candidates for the implementation of advanced nonlinear photonic interactions. In this work we study the combined effects of both coherent population oscillation (CPO) and carrier-induced nonlinear dephasing in the photon lifetime of a L3 cavity incorporating 4 InGaAsP/InGaAs QWs. The CPO induces a decrease of the group velocity through a strong dispersion of the refractive index (i.e. slow light effect) while the nonlinear phase shift, if implemented close to the bistability threshold, ends up with a strong slowing down of the optical response. The resulting cavity lifetime strongly depends on the control parameters. It is then possible to actively control the photon lifetime of the nanocavity, to enhance its quality factor, to achieve differential amplification under the slow-light regime and to benefit from frequency pulling During this presentation we will discuss theoretically [1] all these aspects with respect to the role of CPO and dynamical nonlinear responses. We will further present recent experimental results [2] demonstrating the enhancement by two orders of magnitude of the cavity lifetime together with the frequency pulling effect.Γ

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•May 1, 2013•0 citations

Slow light enhanced nonlinear photonic functionalities

Marcel Spurny, Bill Corcoran, Christelle Monat +1 more

We discuss the enhancement of nonlinear functionalities in slow light photonic crystals. We show how slow light in photonic crystals is created, how nonlinear effects scale with the slowdown factor and what limits nonlinear effects in photonic crystals. We review some of the work recently reported in nonlinear optics in slow light photonic crystals and compare the observed effects to those found in other structures such as coupled resonators or photonic nanowires.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jan 19, 2010•1 citation
A study of parametric nonlinear frequency down-conversion in photonic crystals reveals that under suitable conditions the probe field can be slowed down to approximately 11 m/s. The effect arises as a result of the simultaneous availability of global phase-matching conditions, field localization, and gain experienced by the probe beam. Together, these effects conspire to yield tunneling velocities previously reported only for coherently resonant interactions, i.e., electromagnetic induced transparency, in Bose-Einstein condensates, hot atomic gases, and doped crystals.
Research into slow light began theoretically in 1880 with the paper [1] of H A Lorentz, who is best known for his work on relativity and the speed of light. Experimental work started some 60 years later with the work of S L McCall and E L Hahn [2] who explored non-linear self-induced transparency in ruby. This field of research has burgeoned in the last 10 years, starting with the work of L Vestergaard Hau and coworkers on slow light via electromagnetically induced transparency in a Bose–Einstein condensate [3]. Many groups are now able to slow light down to a few metres per second or even stop the motion of light entirely [4]. Today, slow light – or more often `slow and fast light' – has become its own vibrant field with a strongly increasing number of publications. In broad scope, slow light research can be categorized in terms of the sort of physical mechanism used to slow down the light. One sort of slow light makes use of material dispersion. This dispersion can be the natural dispersion of the ordinary refractive index or can be the frequency dependence of some nonlinear optical process, such as electromagnetically induced transparency, coherent population oscillations, stimulated light scattering, or four-wave mixing processes. The second sort of slow light makes use of the wavelength dependence of artificially structured materials, such as photonic crystals, optical waveguides, and collections of microresonators. Material systems in which slow light has been observed include metal vapours, rare-earth-doped materials, Raman and Brillioun gain media, photonic crystals, microresonators and, more recently, metamaterials. A common feature of all of these schemes is the presence of a sharp single resonance or multiple resonances produced by an atomic transition, a resonance in a photonic structure, or in a nonlinear optical process. Current applications of slow light include a series of attractive topics in optical information processing, such as optical data storage, optical memories, quantum information devices, and optical communication systems in which the use of slow light will allow all-optical processing with less wasted heat. To implement these applications, devices such as buffers, memories, interferometers and switches that utilize slow light need to be developed. Future challenges include the need for improved coupling of light into slow light modes, overcoming propagation losses, and mitigating the influence of large dispersion of the group velocity. The collection of papers in this special issue of Journal of Optics features a broad spectrum of articles that highlight actual developments in many of the material types and schemes described above. It represents therefore an excellent up to date snapshot of the current state of the field of slow light research. References [1] Lorentz H A 1880 Uber die Beziehung zwischen der Fortpflanzung des Lichtes und der Körperdichte Wiedemann Ann. 9 641–64 [2] McCall S L and Hahn E L 1967 Self-induced transparency by pulsed coherent light Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 908–11 [3] Vestergaard Hau L, Harris S E, Dutton Z and Behroozi C H 1999 Nature 397 594 [4] Philips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L and Lukin M D 2001 Storage of light in atomic vapor Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783–6
Summary form only given. We implement coherent population oscillation and carrier-induced nonlinear refractive index in a semiconductor active nanocavity to strongly increase the photonic lifetime and manipulate its optical response.The so-called photonic crystal L3 cavity, given by three missing holes in a 2D photonic crystal (2D-PhC), is an emblematic illustration of a nanocavity with strong light confinement due to high-Q resonance and small mode volume [1]. Strong electronic confinement can also be achieved provided the cavity contains active semiconductor nanostructures such as quantum wells (QWs) or dots. These two effects lead to the enhancement of the light-matter interaction and, potentially, to a modification of photonic, electronic and thermal characteristic times. Thus, semiconductor 2D-PhC L3 nanocavities are excellent candidates for the implementation of advanced nonlinear photonic interactions. In this work we study the combined effects of both coherent population oscillation (CPO) and carrier-induced nonlinear dephasing in the photon lifetime of a L3 cavity incorporating 4 InGaAsP/InGaAs QWs. The CPO induces a decrease of the group velocity through a strong dispersion of the refractive index (i.e. slow light effect) while the nonlinear phase shift, if implemented close to the bistability threshold, ends up with a strong slowing down of the optical response. The resulting cavity lifetime strongly depends on the control parameters. It is then possible to actively control the photon lifetime of the nanocavity, to enhance its quality factor, to achieve differential amplification under the slow-light regime and to benefit from frequency pulling During this presentation we will discuss theoretically [1] all these aspects with respect to the role of CPO and dynamical nonlinear responses. We will further present recent experimental results [2] demonstrating the enhancement by two orders of magnitude of the cavity lifetime together with the frequency pulling effect.Γ