Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

The fate of Schrödinger's cat

Peter John Bussey

Published Feb 1, 1987• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(87)90074-0

Related papers

The Fate of Schrodinger's Cat

James D. Stein

Problem solving in mathematics and beyond•Jan 16, 2020•0 citations

The Fate of Schrodinger’s Cat

Problem solving in mathematics and beyond•Jul 21, 2020•0 citations

The Tale of Schrödinger's Cat

M. Kocher

Physics Today•May 1, 1978•0 citations

Schrödinger cat states and single runs for the damped harmonic oscillator

Peter Goetsch, Robert Graham, Fritz Haake

We discuss the fate of initial states of the Schr\"odinger cat type for the damped harmonic oscillator, mostly employing a linear version of the stochastic Schr\"odinger equation. We also comment on how such cat states might be prepared and on the relation of single realizations of the noise to single runs of experiments.

arXiv:gr-qc/9407001•Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1995•45 citations

How to administer an antidote to Schrödinger’s cat

Juan-Rafael Álvarez, Mark IJspeert, Oliver Barter +6 more

Abstract In his 1935 Gedankenexperiment, Erwin Schrödinger imagined a box with a cat and a poisonous substance which has a 50% probability of being released, based on the decay of a radioactive atom. As such, the life of the cat and the state of the poison become entangled, and the fate of the cat is determined upon opening the box. We present an experimental technique that keeps the cat alive on any account. This method relies on the time-resolved Hong–Ou–Mandel effect: two long, identical photons impinging on a beam splitter always bunch in either of the outputs. Interpreting the first photon detection as the state of the poison, the second photon is identified as the state of the cat. Even after the collapse of the first photon’s state, we show their fates are intertwined through quantum interference. We demonstrate this by a sudden phase change between the inputs, administered conditionally on the outcome of the first detection, which steers the second photon to a pre-defined output and ensures that the cat is always observed alive.

arXiv:2106.09705•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Feb 17, 2022•4 citations

The Paradox of Schrödinger’s Cat

Amit Goswami

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation
Abstract In his 1935 Gedankenexperiment, Erwin Schrödinger imagined a box with a cat and a poisonous substance which has a 50% probability of being released, based on the decay of a radioactive atom. As such, the life of the cat and the state of the poison become entangled, and the fate of the cat is determined upon opening the box. We present an experimental technique that keeps the cat alive on any account. This method relies on the time-resolved Hong–Ou–Mandel effect: two long, identical photons impinging on a beam splitter always bunch in either of the outputs. Interpreting the first photon detection as the state of the poison, the second photon is identified as the state of the cat. Even after the collapse of the first photon’s state, we show their fates are intertwined through quantum interference. We demonstrate this by a sudden phase change between the inputs, administered conditionally on the outcome of the first detection, which steers the second photon to a pre-defined output and ensures that the cat is always observed alive.