We discuss the introduction of constraints in a system of n noninteracting particles which obey the laws of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper the particles are first thought of as being unconstrained (described by the
3n Cartesian coordinates of a flat space
R), but subject to an external potential
V which, in a certian suitable limit, forces the system to remain in a curved subspace
V of
R. This idea was already employed in a previous work where we have discussed the motion of one constrained particle. It was then shown that in order to obtain a meaningful result the particle wave function should be "uniformly compressed" into a surface (or curve), avoiding, in this way, the tangential forces which correspond to the dissipative constraints of classical mechanics. The resulting Schr\"odinger equation could then be separated in such a way that the part which contained the surface (or curve) variables was independent of the potential
V employed in the constraining process. In the present paper we show that this procedure cannot be carried out for all subspaces
V of
R in the case of a many-particle system, unless
V satisfies a certain geometrical condition. The many-particle Schr\"odinger equation (as was already the case of the one-particle systems) contains, besides the kinetic energy term, potentials which are not bending invariants, that is, cannot be obtained from the metric tensor
gij of
V or its derivatives. This gives rise to different Schr\"odinger equations for isometric subspaces, in striking contrast with the usual quantization procedures which start from the classical Lagrangian of the constrained system.
Systems with constraints pose problems when they are quantized. Moreover, the Dirac procedure of quantization prior to reduction is preferred. The projection operator method of quantization, which can be most conveniently described by coherent state path integrals, enables one to directly impose a regularized form of the quantum constraints. This procedure also overcomes conventional difficulties with normalization and second class constraints that invalidate conventional Dirac quantization procedures.
An integrable anharmonic oscillator is presumably simulable by a classical computer and therefore by a quantum computer. An integrable anharmonic oscillator whose Hamiltonian is of normal type and quartic in the canonical coordinates is not quantizable. If, as argued here, quantum simulation of a finitely realizable classical physical system entails quantization of that system, then either there exist nonsimulable, integrable anharmonic oscillators or there are no obstructions to quantization by simulation. Simulation quantization implies further that any obstructions to quantization arise entirely within the quantum domain.
Abstract We implement the so-called Weyl–Heisenberg covariant integral quantization in the case of a classical system constrained by a bounded or semi-bounded geometry. The procedure, which is free of the ordering problem of operators, is illustrated with the basic example of the one-dimensional motion of a free particle in an interval, and yields a fuzzy boundary, a position-dependent mass, and an extra potential on the quantum level. The consistency of our quantization is discussed by analyzing the semi-classical phase space portrait of the derived quantum dynamics, which is obtained as a regularization of its original classical counterpart.
The relationship between the Dirac and reduced phase space quantizations is investigated for spin models belonging to the class of Hamiltonian systems having no gauge conditions. It is traced out that the two quantization methods may give similar, or essentially different physical results, and, moreover, it is shown that there is a class of constrained systems, which can be quantized only by the Dirac method. A possible interpretation of the gauge degrees of freedom is given. Introduction There are two main methods to quantize the Hamiltonian systems with first class constraints: the Dirac quantization [1] and the reduced phase space quantization [2], whereas two other methods, the path integral method [3, 2] and the BRST quantization [4] being the most popular method for the covariant quantization of gauge-invariant systems, are based on and proceed from them [2, 5]. The basic idea of the Dirac method consists in imposing quantum mechanically the first class constraints as operator conditions on the states for singling out the physical ones [1]. The reduced phase space quantization first identifies the physical degrees of freedom at the classical level by the factorization of the constraint surface with respect to the action of the gauge group, generated by the constraints. Then the resulting Hamiltonian system is quantized as a usual unconstrained system [2]. Naturally, the problem of the relationship of these two methods arises. It was discussed in different contexts in literature [6], and there is an opinion that the differences between the two quantization methods can be traced out to a choice of factor ordering in the construction of various physical operators.