Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

On local observables in quantum mechanics

K.Kong Wang, Tony Jackson

Published Dec 1, 1984• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(84)91012-0

Related papers

Quasi-local observables and the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics

A. Frigerio

•Jan 1, 1974•1 citation

Local observables, nonlocality, and asymptotically separable quantum mechanics

K. Kong Wan

Foundations of Physics•Sep 1, 1988•3 citations

On the localization of momentum observables in quantum mechanics

K. Kong Wan, Tony Jackson, I. H. McKenna

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jun 1, 1984•11 citations

Quantum mechanics and the local observer

Yvon Gauthier

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1983•21 citations

A quantum mechanical theory of local observables and local operations

Willem M. de Muynck

Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 1984•12 citations

GR–QM–CCC Interpenetrating Closure: Projection-Compressed Observability, Residual Coherence, and Realization Accessibility

Jimmy Chen

This work develops a GR–QM–CCC interpenetrating framework within Causal Cloud Cosmology (CCC). Rather than treating general relativity, quantum mechanics, and CCC as mutually exclusive systems, this paper interprets them as different observable layers of continuously accumulated realizable structure. General relativity is preserved as the observable-regime description of curvature geometry. Quantum mechanics is preserved as the predictive framework for observable quantum evolution, probabilities, interference, measurement outcomes, and statistical manifestation. CCC provides an interpretive layer for residual structural continuity, projection-compressed observability, and realization accessibility across observable manifestation regimes. Within this framework, entanglement, interference, decoherence, delayed-choice behavior, weak measurement, localization, temporal observability, cold atom localization, large-molecule interference, and classical emergence are interpreted as observable manifestation regimes under projection-compressed accessibility. Observable fragmentation does not necessarily imply structural fragmentation. Projection compression modifies observable accessibility rather than destroying accumulated realizable structure itself. Residual coherence may remain partially preserved even when local observable manifestation becomes strongly localized or decohered. The paper introduces and organizes key GR–QM–CCC concepts including observable quantum manifestation, residual coherence, realization accessibility, temporal observability, projection-compressed classicality, accessibility-stabilized localization, and unified observable closure. This work does not claim to replace general relativity or quantum mechanics. Instead, it proposes a conservative structural interpretation in which GR describes observable geometry, QM predicts observable manifestation, and CCC interprets residual continuity and realization accessibility across projection-compressed observable regimes.

•May 21, 2026•8 citations
This work develops a GR–QM–CCC interpenetrating framework within Causal Cloud Cosmology (CCC). Rather than treating general relativity, quantum mechanics, and CCC as mutually exclusive systems, this paper interprets them as different observable layers of continuously accumulated realizable structure. General relativity is preserved as the observable-regime description of curvature geometry. Quantum mechanics is preserved as the predictive framework for observable quantum evolution, probabilities, interference, measurement outcomes, and statistical manifestation. CCC provides an interpretive layer for residual structural continuity, projection-compressed observability, and realization accessibility across observable manifestation regimes. Within this framework, entanglement, interference, decoherence, delayed-choice behavior, weak measurement, localization, temporal observability, cold atom localization, large-molecule interference, and classical emergence are interpreted as observable manifestation regimes under projection-compressed accessibility. Observable fragmentation does not necessarily imply structural fragmentation. Projection compression modifies observable accessibility rather than destroying accumulated realizable structure itself. Residual coherence may remain partially preserved even when local observable manifestation becomes strongly localized or decohered. The paper introduces and organizes key GR–QM–CCC concepts including observable quantum manifestation, residual coherence, realization accessibility, temporal observability, projection-compressed classicality, accessibility-stabilized localization, and unified observable closure. This work does not claim to replace general relativity or quantum mechanics. Instead, it proposes a conservative structural interpretation in which GR describes observable geometry, QM predicts observable manifestation, and CCC interprets residual continuity and realization accessibility across projection-compressed observable regimes.