Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Wigner distribution and pulse propagation

Leon W. Cohen

Published Nov 20, 2001• 15 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We use the Wigner distribution to study pulse propagation in a dispersive media and we show that it leads naturally to a particle view. Using the results obtained we develop a simple approximation method that evolves a pulse in time.
DOI
10.1117/12.448655

Related papers

Phase space distributions for dispersive media

Jonathan C. Petruccelli, Miguel Angel Alonso

Phase space descriptions of pulses in 1D transparent dispersive media are presented. Unlike the standard Wigner function, spatial propagation/temporal evolution is described exactly by a free-particle-like transformation (e.g. phase space shearing) for any dispersion relation.

Frontiers in Optics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Wigner functions in optics: describing beams as ray bundles and pulses as particle ensembles

Miguel Angel Alonso

This tutorial gives an overview of the use of the Wigner function as a tool for modeling optical field propagation. Particular emphasis is placed on the spatial propagation of stationary fields, as well as on the propagation of pulses through dispersive media. In the first case, the Wigner function gives a representation of the field that is similar to a radiance or weight distribution for all the rays in the system, since its arguments are both position and direction. In cases in which the field is paraxial and where the system is described by a simple linear relation in the ray regime, the Wigner function is constant under propagation along rays. An equivalent property holds for optical pulse propagation in dispersive media under analogous assumptions. Several properties and applications of the Wigner function in these contexts are discussed, as is its connection with other common phase-space distributions like the ambiguity function, the spectrogram, and the Husimi, P, Q, and Kirkwood–Rihaczek functions. Also discussed are modifications to the definition of the Wigner function that allow extending the property of conservation along paths to a wider range of problems, including nonparaxial field propagation and pulse propagation within general transparent dispersive media.

Advances in Optics and Photonics•Nov 17, 2011•175 citations

Generalized phase space representations in classical optics

Miguel Angel Alonso, Jonathan C. Petruccelli, Seongkeun Cho

We give a prescription for defining generalizations of the Wigner function that allow extending the property of conservation along paths to a wider range of problems, including nonparaxial field propagation and pulse propagation within general transparent dispersive media.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 10, 2011•0 citations

Local group velocity and path-delay: semi-classical propagators for the time evolution of Wigner functions in deep tunneling and in dispersive media

Shimshon Kallush, Emmanuel Tannenbaum, Bilha Segev

Chemical Physics Letters•Sep 10, 2004•0 citations

Generating approximate Wigner distributions using Gaussian phase packets propagation in imaginary time.

Daniel Borgis, Marie‐Pierre Gaigeot, C. Marinica

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Approximate wave function from approximate non-representable Wigner distributions

Patrick J. Loughlin, Leon W. Cohen

We have recently derived a phase space approximation for wave propagation, and we have shown that this approximation is accurate especially compared to the stationary phase approximation. The method gives an approximate Wigner distribution, which raises the question, is the approximate Wigner distribution representable? If it is, then we can invert it to obtain the corresponding wave function. If it is not, can we obtain an approximate wave function from it, and how good is the approximation? Although the answer to the first question is no, we show that from the Wigner approximation one can recover the exact spatial spectrum magnitude and derivative of the phase. We also consider other methods for obtaining approximate wave functions from the Wigner approximation.

Journal of Modern Optics•Nov 10, 2008•13 citations
This tutorial gives an overview of the use of the Wigner function as a tool for modeling optical field propagation. Particular emphasis is placed on the spatial propagation of stationary fields, as well as on the propagation of pulses through dispersive media. In the first case, the Wigner function gives a representation of the field that is similar to a radiance or weight distribution for all the rays in the system, since its arguments are both position and direction. In cases in which the field is paraxial and where the system is described by a simple linear relation in the ray regime, the Wigner function is constant under propagation along rays. An equivalent property holds for optical pulse propagation in dispersive media under analogous assumptions. Several properties and applications of the Wigner function in these contexts are discussed, as is its connection with other common phase-space distributions like the ambiguity function, the spectrogram, and the Husimi, P, Q, and Kirkwood–Rihaczek functions. Also discussed are modifications to the definition of the Wigner function that allow extending the property of conservation along paths to a wider range of problems, including nonparaxial field propagation and pulse propagation within general transparent dispersive media.
We have recently derived a phase space approximation for wave propagation, and we have shown that this approximation is accurate especially compared to the stationary phase approximation. The method gives an approximate Wigner distribution, which raises the question, is the approximate Wigner distribution representable? If it is, then we can invert it to obtain the corresponding wave function. If it is not, can we obtain an approximate wave function from it, and how good is the approximation? Although the answer to the first question is no, we show that from the Wigner approximation one can recover the exact spatial spectrum magnitude and derivative of the phase. We also consider other methods for obtaining approximate wave functions from the Wigner approximation.