Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Detection of quantum noise

I. R. Senitzky

Published Dec 1, 1993• 13 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Noise that can be attributed to vacuum fluctuations, usually referred to as quantum noise, is examined. It is shown that vacuum fluctuations of a single uncoupled mode do not constitute noise, in the sense of a random process, but the superposition of the fluctuations of a large number of modes does constitute, formally, noise. The effect of vacuum fluctuations of the free-space radiation field on a harmonic oscillator, a nondegenerate parametric amplifier, and a degenerate parametric amplifier, all driven by a prescribed sinusoidal field, is compared with the effect of classical noise. It is found that the coordinates of all systems respond in a formally similar manner to both vacuum fluctuations and classical noise. However, the resonance fluorescence spectrum---the evidence of ``detection''---is completely different for the two kinds of noise. The spectrum of the harmonic oscillator does not exhibit noise in response to vacuum fluctuations, but does so in response to classical noise. The spectra of the two types of parametric amplifiers do exhibit noise in response to vacuum fluctuations, but this noise differs from that in the classical case. An explanation for the difference is offered, based on the fact that the quantum fluctuations cannot do work, but can noise-modulate power from an outside source, which, for the parametric amplifiers, is the pump. In the analysis of noise from the degenerate parametric amplifier, it is shown that squeezed noise, viewed as an oscillation of the dispersion with a sufficiently low minimum, is generated in the same manner in the case of classical noise as in the case of quantum noise, and is due to phase conjugation.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.48.4629

Related papers

Phase noise in quantum physics

Barry C. Sanders

The nature of phase noise in quantum optics is analyzed. In an experiment involving the measurement of the electromagnetic field the two quantities of interest are the energy and phase of the field. However, measurements of the quantities produce quantum fluctuations. The quantum fluctuations are regarded as noise in the treatment presented here. The quantum system is represented by a probability distribution, the Wigner function, and the quantum fluctuations are treated as stochastic noise associated with the quantity being measured. The difficulties of associating a quantum operator with the phase of the system are reviewed and the related energy-phase uncertainty relation is discussed. The alternate interpretation of the phase noise of a quantum system as being the classical phase noise of the Wigner function is presented. In particular the energy and phase noise of the vacuum state, the coherent state, the squeezed state and the squeezed vacuum are discussed in this way. The squeezed states of light are minimum uncertainty states with respect to the quadrature operators and exhibit noise of one quadrature below the noise level associated with the vacuum. The reduced noise level in one quadrature of the field underlies the importance of squeezed states in many practical applications where there is a need to reduce the quantum noise of one quadrature of coherent light. The periodic phase operator eliminates the difficulties associated with the multivalued nature of phase. The analysis of the vacuum and intense coherent state of Carruthers and Nieto by employing periodic phase operators is reviewed, particularly with respect to the energy-phase uncertainty relations and we generalize the approach to develop a phase operator analysis of the squeezed state in the intense field and vacuum limits. We demonstrate here for the first time that the phase operator is simply related to the phase of the squeezed state in the intense field limit and that the squeezed state is approximately an energy-phase minimum uncertainty state in the low-squeezing limit. Also we enlarge on previous work to demonstrate that the phase operator corresponds simply and unambiguously to the phase of the squeeze parameter for the strongly squeezed vacuum and the intensely squeezed vacuum is an energy-phase minimum uncertainty state for some values of phase. The occurrence of squeezing for the case of two coupled quantum oscillators is presented. The system consisting of one mode of the electromagnetic field coupled to a spinless nonrelativistic electron subjected to an harmonic potential is represented by two coupled harmonic oscillators. The dynamics are compared for the case that the rotating wave approximation is employed and for the case that the counter-rotating terms are included. These calculations have not been performed before. The parametric amplifier Hamiltonian with a nonresonant coupling is also studied in order to provide insight into the effects of the counter-rotating terms. Squeezing of the field produced by the electron is a consequence of the inclusion of the counter-rotating terms. The case of a spinless nonrelativistic electron subject to an harmonic potential and coupled to a continuum of electromagnetic field modes is also considered. The case of two coupled oscillators discussed above is generalized by replacing the oscillator which represents the single-mode field by a bath of oscillators. The effects of including counter-rotating terms and of ignoring the counter - rotating terms in the Hamiltonian are compared. The interaction is assumed to produce a frequency shift and an exponential damping term for the oscillating electron. The frequency shift is assumed to be small in either case and so the Wigner-Weisskopff approximation is employed to solve the equations of motion. We demonstrate the new results that dissipation-induced phase-dependent noise is a consequence of including the counter-rotating terms and that the noise is phase-independent for the case that the counterrotating terms are excluded. The relation between these results and recent work on quantum tunnelling in superconducting quantum interference devices is discussed. We conclude by suggesting further research related to the work in this thesis.

•Nov 1, 1987•0 citations

Incoherence, Quantum Fluctuations, and Noise

I. R. Senitzky

An examination is made of the relationship between the uncertainty principle and minimum amplifier noise. First, the concept of coherence is discussed, and an incoherence parameter is defined in terms of the uncertainty that enters into the uncertainty principle. Harmonic oscillator states are examined for coherence. The concept of noise is then discussed and contrasted with incoherence, noise referring to behavior in time of a single system while incoherence involving comparison among members of an ensemble. It is shown, with illustrations, that the two concepts are different, and that an incoherent field of a cavity mode need not exhibit noise. In particular, the zero-point field in a lossless cavity is not noise. The superposition of many incoherent effects, however, usually leads to noise. Spontaneous emission is examined both for coherence and noise. It is shown that the spontaneous emission field of a single molecule is incoherent but does not exhibit noise; the (low order) spontaneous emission from a molecular beam, however, does constitute noise. Spontaneous emission from complex systems is also discussed. The origin of fundamental noise in an amplifier is investigated and is shown to come from spontaneous emission by the amplification mechanism. It is concluded that fundamental noise cannot be determined by a consideration of quantum fluctuations of---or by the application of the uncertainty principle to---the electromagnetic field only, as has been done in several recent articles. The physical significance of the zero-point field is analyzed, and is shown to lie in a formal contribution to spontaneous emission by the mechanism coupled to the field, provided this mechanism is treated quantum mechanically.

Physical Review•Dec 15, 1962•21 citations

Quantum noise reduction in optical amplification

Z. Y. Ou, Silvania F. Pereira, Harry J. Kimble

Quantum fluctuations in optical amplification are investigated with a nondegenerate optical parametric amplifier whose internal idler mode is coupled to a squeezed vacuum. Reductions of the inherent quantum noise of the amplifier are observed with a minimum noise level 0.7 dB below the usual noise level of the amplifier with its internal idler mode in a vacuum state. With a small coherent field as the signal input, the amplified output exhibits an improvement in signal-to-noise ratio of 0.5 dB for the case of a squeezed-vacuum as compared to a vacuum state for the amplifier's internal mode.

Physical Review Letters•May 24, 1993•98 citations

Quantum noise reduction in nondegenerate parametric amplification

Z. Y. Ou, Silvania F. Pereira, H. Jeffrey Kimble

Quantum fluctuations in an optical amplifier are of fundamental as well as technological significance and lead to basic limitations on noise performance. It is well-known that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an injected signal is degraded in the amplification process due to added noise from thermal or (at best) vacuum fluctuations of the internal modes of the amplifier.[1] However, if the internal modes are coupled to a squeezed vacuum, the added noise in amplification can be reduced.[2] With this motivation, we have constructed a nondegenerate parametric amplifier whose idler mode is itself coupled to a squeezed vacuum, which is generated by a second parametric amplifier. Phase-sensitive noise amplification of a vacuum input to the signal mode is observed with the minimum amplified noise level 0.5dB below the usual phase-insensitive amplified noise level for the amplified signal of the same amplifier but with the idler mode coupled to a vacuum state. Prospects for improvement by increasing the squeezing that is coupled into the idler mode of the amplifier beyond the current level of 2dB as well as surprising results from our theoretical analysis which includes losses will be discussed.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Quantum noise and squeezing in an optical parametric oscillator with arbitrary output-mirror coupling. III. Effect of pump amplitude and phase fluctuations

Sudhakar Prasad

Quantum fluctuations and squeezing of the signal field generated by a degenerate optical parametric oscillator are sensitive to the phase and amplitude fluctuations of the second-harmonic pump. The analysis reported here extends our previous calculations for a perfectly monochromatic noise-free pump to allow for finite pump amplitude and phase fluctuations. We treat the typically intense pump field with its fluctuations as a classical Gaussian stochastic process in two limits: first, when the pump has amplitude fluctuations but its phase is fixed and second, when its phase diffuses but its amplitude is fixed. Since pump amplitude noise affects the evolution of the signal field multiplicatively, it has a lesser impact on the quantum fluctuations of the signal than pump phase diffusion which compromises such fluctuations via the extreme phase sensitivity of the parametric amplification process. For the latter limit, our calculations extend the work of Gea-Banacloche and Zubairy [Phys. Rev. A 42, 1742 (1990)] to cavities with arbitrary transmission coefficients for the bounding mirrors.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1994•7 citations

Resonance fluorescence of linear and nonlinear oscillators according to classical and quantum theories: An insight into vacuum fluctuations

I. R. Senitzky

The resonance fluorescence spectrum of linear and nonlinear oscillators driven by a monochromatic field of frequency ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$, near the resonant frequency \ensuremath{\omega}, is calculated both classically and quantum mechanically. The result for the linear oscillator is the same in both calculations: a \ensuremath{\delta} function at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$. For the nonlinear oscillator, however, the classical and quantum-mechanical spectra near resonance are qualitatively different: Classically, a \ensuremath{\delta} function at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$ is obtained; quantum mechanically, a weak-field calculation leads to a \ensuremath{\delta} function at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$ together with finite-width peaks nearby. An intuitive explanation for the difference is suggested by the examination of the quantum-mechanical energy-correlation function for the linear oscillator. This function describes energy oscillations with frequencies within a band centered at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$-\ensuremath{\omega}. The oscillations can be interpreted as the beating of the driven oscillation with those produced by the vacuum fluctuations (the latter having a frequency spread of the order of the relaxation constant). Because of the nonlinearity, the energy oscillation modulates the effect of the driving field to produce sidebands. Higher-order processes produce additional peaks. A heuristic picture of vacuum fluctuations is developed.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1989•1 citation
Noise that can be attributed to vacuum fluctuations, usually referred to as quantum noise, is examined. It is shown that vacuum fluctuations of a single uncoupled mode do not constitute noise, in the sense of a random process, but the superposition of the fluctuations of a large number of modes does constitute, formally, noise. The effect of vacuum fluctuations of the free-space radiation field on a harmonic oscillator, a nondegenerate parametric amplifier, and a degenerate parametric amplifier, all driven by a prescribed sinusoidal field, is compared with the effect of classical noise. It is found that the coordinates of all systems respond in a formally similar manner to both vacuum fluctuations and classical noise. However, the resonance fluorescence spectrum---the evidence of ``detection''---is completely different for the two kinds of noise. The spectrum of the harmonic oscillator does not exhibit noise in response to vacuum fluctuations, but does so in response to classical noise. The spectra of the two types of parametric amplifiers do exhibit noise in response to vacuum fluctuations, but this noise differs from that in the classical case. An explanation for the difference is offered, based on the fact that the quantum fluctuations cannot do work, but can noise-modulate power from an outside source, which, for the parametric amplifiers, is the pump. In the analysis of noise from the degenerate parametric amplifier, it is shown that squeezed noise, viewed as an oscillation of the dispersion with a sufficiently low minimum, is generated in the same manner in the case of classical noise as in the case of quantum noise, and is due to phase conjugation.
The nature of phase noise in quantum optics is analyzed. In an experiment involving the measurement of the electromagnetic field the two quantities of interest are the energy and phase of the field. However, measurements of the quantities produce quantum fluctuations. The quantum fluctuations are regarded as noise in the treatment presented here. The quantum system is represented by a probability distribution, the Wigner function, and the quantum fluctuations are treated as stochastic noise associated with the quantity being measured. The difficulties of associating a quantum operator with the phase of the system are reviewed and the related energy-phase uncertainty relation is discussed. The alternate interpretation of the phase noise of a quantum system as being the classical phase noise of the Wigner function is presented. In particular the energy and phase noise of the vacuum state, the coherent state, the squeezed state and the squeezed vacuum are discussed in this way. The squeezed states of light are minimum uncertainty states with respect to the quadrature operators and exhibit noise of one quadrature below the noise level associated with the vacuum. The reduced noise level in one quadrature of the field underlies the importance of squeezed states in many practical applications where there is a need to reduce the quantum noise of one quadrature of coherent light. The periodic phase operator eliminates the difficulties associated with the multivalued nature of phase. The analysis of the vacuum and intense coherent state of Carruthers and Nieto by employing periodic phase operators is reviewed, particularly with respect to the energy-phase uncertainty relations and we generalize the approach to develop a phase operator analysis of the squeezed state in the intense field and vacuum limits. We demonstrate here for the first time that the phase operator is simply related to the phase of the squeezed state in the intense field limit and that the squeezed state is approximately an energy-phase minimum uncertainty state in the low-squeezing limit. Also we enlarge on previous work to demonstrate that the phase operator corresponds simply and unambiguously to the phase of the squeeze parameter for the strongly squeezed vacuum and the intensely squeezed vacuum is an energy-phase minimum uncertainty state for some values of phase. The occurrence of squeezing for the case of two coupled quantum oscillators is presented. The system consisting of one mode of the electromagnetic field coupled to a spinless nonrelativistic electron subjected to an harmonic potential is represented by two coupled harmonic oscillators. The dynamics are compared for the case that the rotating wave approximation is employed and for the case that the counter-rotating terms are included. These calculations have not been performed before. The parametric amplifier Hamiltonian with a nonresonant coupling is also studied in order to provide insight into the effects of the counter-rotating terms. Squeezing of the field produced by the electron is a consequence of the inclusion of the counter-rotating terms. The case of a spinless nonrelativistic electron subject to an harmonic potential and coupled to a continuum of electromagnetic field modes is also considered. The case of two coupled oscillators discussed above is generalized by replacing the oscillator which represents the single-mode field by a bath of oscillators. The effects of including counter-rotating terms and of ignoring the counter - rotating terms in the Hamiltonian are compared. The interaction is assumed to produce a frequency shift and an exponential damping term for the oscillating electron. The frequency shift is assumed to be small in either case and so the Wigner-Weisskopff approximation is employed to solve the equations of motion. We demonstrate the new results that dissipation-induced phase-dependent noise is a consequence of including the counter-rotating terms and that the noise is phase-independent for the case that the counterrotating terms are excluded. The relation between these results and recent work on quantum tunnelling in superconducting quantum interference devices is discussed. We conclude by suggesting further research related to the work in this thesis.
An examination is made of the relationship between the uncertainty principle and minimum amplifier noise. First, the concept of coherence is discussed, and an incoherence parameter is defined in terms of the uncertainty that enters into the uncertainty principle. Harmonic oscillator states are examined for coherence. The concept of noise is then discussed and contrasted with incoherence, noise referring to behavior in time of a single system while incoherence involving comparison among members of an ensemble. It is shown, with illustrations, that the two concepts are different, and that an incoherent field of a cavity mode need not exhibit noise. In particular, the zero-point field in a lossless cavity is not noise. The superposition of many incoherent effects, however, usually leads to noise. Spontaneous emission is examined both for coherence and noise. It is shown that the spontaneous emission field of a single molecule is incoherent but does not exhibit noise; the (low order) spontaneous emission from a molecular beam, however, does constitute noise. Spontaneous emission from complex systems is also discussed. The origin of fundamental noise in an amplifier is investigated and is shown to come from spontaneous emission by the amplification mechanism. It is concluded that fundamental noise cannot be determined by a consideration of quantum fluctuations of---or by the application of the uncertainty principle to---the electromagnetic field only, as has been done in several recent articles. The physical significance of the zero-point field is analyzed, and is shown to lie in a formal contribution to spontaneous emission by the mechanism coupled to the field, provided this mechanism is treated quantum mechanically.
Quantum fluctuations in optical amplification are investigated with a nondegenerate optical parametric amplifier whose internal idler mode is coupled to a squeezed vacuum. Reductions of the inherent quantum noise of the amplifier are observed with a minimum noise level 0.7 dB below the usual noise level of the amplifier with its internal idler mode in a vacuum state. With a small coherent field as the signal input, the amplified output exhibits an improvement in signal-to-noise ratio of 0.5 dB for the case of a squeezed-vacuum as compared to a vacuum state for the amplifier's internal mode.
Quantum fluctuations in an optical amplifier are of fundamental as well as technological significance and lead to basic limitations on noise performance. It is well-known that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an injected signal is degraded in the amplification process due to added noise from thermal or (at best) vacuum fluctuations of the internal modes of the amplifier.[1] However, if the internal modes are coupled to a squeezed vacuum, the added noise in amplification can be reduced.[2] With this motivation, we have constructed a nondegenerate parametric amplifier whose idler mode is itself coupled to a squeezed vacuum, which is generated by a second parametric amplifier. Phase-sensitive noise amplification of a vacuum input to the signal mode is observed with the minimum amplified noise level 0.5dB below the usual phase-insensitive amplified noise level for the amplified signal of the same amplifier but with the idler mode coupled to a vacuum state. Prospects for improvement by increasing the squeezing that is coupled into the idler mode of the amplifier beyond the current level of 2dB as well as surprising results from our theoretical analysis which includes losses will be discussed.
Quantum fluctuations and squeezing of the signal field generated by a degenerate optical parametric oscillator are sensitive to the phase and amplitude fluctuations of the second-harmonic pump. The analysis reported here extends our previous calculations for a perfectly monochromatic noise-free pump to allow for finite pump amplitude and phase fluctuations. We treat the typically intense pump field with its fluctuations as a classical Gaussian stochastic process in two limits: first, when the pump has amplitude fluctuations but its phase is fixed and second, when its phase diffuses but its amplitude is fixed. Since pump amplitude noise affects the evolution of the signal field multiplicatively, it has a lesser impact on the quantum fluctuations of the signal than pump phase diffusion which compromises such fluctuations via the extreme phase sensitivity of the parametric amplification process. For the latter limit, our calculations extend the work of Gea-Banacloche and Zubairy [Phys. Rev. A 42, 1742 (1990)] to cavities with arbitrary transmission coefficients for the bounding mirrors.
The resonance fluorescence spectrum of linear and nonlinear oscillators driven by a monochromatic field of frequency ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$, near the resonant frequency \ensuremath{\omega}, is calculated both classically and quantum mechanically. The result for the linear oscillator is the same in both calculations: a \ensuremath{\delta} function at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$. For the nonlinear oscillator, however, the classical and quantum-mechanical spectra near resonance are qualitatively different: Classically, a \ensuremath{\delta} function at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$ is obtained; quantum mechanically, a weak-field calculation leads to a \ensuremath{\delta} function at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$ together with finite-width peaks nearby. An intuitive explanation for the difference is suggested by the examination of the quantum-mechanical energy-correlation function for the linear oscillator. This function describes energy oscillations with frequencies within a band centered at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$-\ensuremath{\omega}. The oscillations can be interpreted as the beating of the driven oscillation with those produced by the vacuum fluctuations (the latter having a frequency spread of the order of the relaxation constant). Because of the nonlinearity, the energy oscillation modulates the effect of the driving field to produce sidebands. Higher-order processes produce additional peaks. A heuristic picture of vacuum fluctuations is developed.