Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Interferometry without beam splitters — a sensitive technique for spinor phases

Rajendra Bhandari

Published Aug 1, 1993• 20 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(93)90488-l

Related papers

Quantum-enhanced interferometry with asymmetric beam splitters

Wei Zhong, Fan Wang, Lan Zhou +2 more

arXiv:2001.00302•Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Mar 2, 2020•31 citations

Matter-wave interferometry based on barrier beam splitters

陈晨, Shuyu Zhou

Physics Letters A•Aug 22, 2024•0 citations

General properties of lossless beam splitters in interferometry

Anton Zeilinger

The author uses spinor algebra to investigate general properties of lossless beam splitters in interferometry.(AIP)

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1981•181 citations

A spin- interferometer using light beams

Rajendra Bhandari, Tarakeshwar Dasgupta

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1990•21 citations

Spinor Bose-Einstein-condensate phase-sensitive amplifier for SU(1,1) interferometry

Jonathan Wrubel, Arne Schwettmann, Donald P. Fahey +6 more

The SU(1,1) interferometer was originally conceived as a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with the beam splitters replaced by parametric amplifiers. The parametric amplifiers produce states with correlations that result in enhanced phase sensitivity. $F=1$ spinor Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) can serve as the parametric amplifiers for an atomic version of such an interferometer by collisionally producing entangled pairs of $|F=1,m=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ensuremath{\rangle}$ atoms. We simulate the effect of single- and double-sided seeding of the inputs to the amplifier using the truncated-Wigner approximation. We find that single-sided seeding degrades the performance of the interferometer exactly at the phase the unseeded interferometer should operate the best. Double-sided seeding results in a phase-sensitive amplifier, where the maximal sensitivity is a function of the phase relationship between the input states of the amplifier. In both single- and double-sided seeding we find there exists an optimal phase shift that achieves sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit. Experimentally, we demonstrate a spinor phase-sensitive amplifier using a BEC of $^{23}\mathrm{Na}$ in an optical dipole trap. This configuration could be used as an input to such an interferometer. We are able to control the initial phase of the double-seeded amplifier and demonstrate sensitivity to initial population fractions as small as 0.1%.

arXiv:1807.06676•Physical Review A•Aug 16, 2018•22 citations

Interferometry using magnetic sensitive states

Eduardo Gómez García

•Apr 1, 2016•0 citations
The SU(1,1) interferometer was originally conceived as a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with the beam splitters replaced by parametric amplifiers. The parametric amplifiers produce states with correlations that result in enhanced phase sensitivity. F=1F=1F=1 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) can serve as the parametric amplifiers for an atomic version of such an interferometer by collisionally producing entangled pairs of $|F=1,m=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ensuremath{\rangle}$ atoms. We simulate the effect of single- and double-sided seeding of the inputs to the amplifier using the truncated-Wigner approximation. We find that single-sided seeding degrades the performance of the interferometer exactly at the phase the unseeded interferometer should operate the best. Double-sided seeding results in a phase-sensitive amplifier, where the maximal sensitivity is a function of the phase relationship between the input states of the amplifier. In both single- and double-sided seeding we find there exists an optimal phase shift that achieves sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit. Experimentally, we demonstrate a spinor phase-sensitive amplifier using a BEC of 23Na^{23}\mathrm{Na}23Na in an optical dipole trap. This configuration could be used as an input to such an interferometer. We are able to control the initial phase of the double-seeded amplifier and demonstrate sensitivity to initial population fractions as small as 0.1%.