Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

Quantum Mechanics of a Particle on a Curved Surface: Comparison of Three Different Approaches

Mitsuhiro Ikegami, Yasutaka Nagaoka, Shuji Takagi, T. Tanzawa

Published Aug 1, 1992• 53 citations
Publisher

Abstract

When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.

DOI
10.1143/ptp/88.2.229

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics of a Particle on a Curved Surface

Mitsuhiro Ikegami, Yosuke Nagaoka, Shin Takagi +1 more

When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1992•13 citations

Quantum mechanics of a constrained particle

R. C. T. da Costa

The motion of a particle rigidly bounded to a surface is discussed, considering the Schr\"odinger equation of a free particle constrained to move, by the action of an external potential, in an infinitely thin sheet of the ordinary three-dimensional space. Contrary to what seems to be the general belief expressed in the literature, this limiting process gives a perfectly well-defined result, provided that we take some simple precautions in the definition of the potentials and wave functions. It can then be shown that the wave function splits into two parts: the normal part, which contains the infinite energies required by the uncertainty principle, and a tangent part which contains "surface potentials" depending both on the Gaussian and mean curvatures. An immediate consequence of these results is the existence of different quantum mechanical properties for two isometric surfaces, as can be seen from the bound state which appears along the edge of a folded (but not stretched) plane. The fact that this surface potential is not a bending invariant (cannot be expressed as a function of the components of the metric tensor and their derivatives) is also interesting from the more general point of view of the quantum mechanics in curved spaces, since it can never be obtained from the classical Lagrangian of an a priori constrained particle without substantial modifications in the usual quantization procedures. Similar calculations are also presented for the case of a particle bounded to a curve. The properties of the constraining spatial potential, necessary to a meaningful limiting process, are discussed in some detail, and, as expected, the resulting Schr\"odinger equation contains a "linear potential" which is a function of the curvature.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1981•589 citations

Constraints in quantum mechanics

R. C. T. da Costa

We discuss the introduction of constraints in a system of n noninteracting particles which obey the laws of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper the particles are first thought of as being unconstrained (described by the $3n$ Cartesian coordinates of a flat space $R$), but subject to an external potential $V$ which, in a certian suitable limit, forces the system to remain in a curved subspace $V$ of $R$. This idea was already employed in a previous work where we have discussed the motion of one constrained particle. It was then shown that in order to obtain a meaningful result the particle wave function should be "uniformly compressed" into a surface (or curve), avoiding, in this way, the tangential forces which correspond to the dissipative constraints of classical mechanics. The resulting Schr\"odinger equation could then be separated in such a way that the part which contained the surface (or curve) variables was independent of the potential $V$ employed in the constraining process. In the present paper we show that this procedure cannot be carried out for all subspaces $V$ of $R$ in the case of a many-particle system, unless $V$ satisfies a certain geometrical condition. The many-particle Schr\"odinger equation (as was already the case of the one-particle systems) contains, besides the kinetic energy term, potentials which are not bending invariants, that is, cannot be obtained from the metric tensor ${g}_{\mathrm{ij}}$ of $V$ or its derivatives. This gives rise to different Schr\"odinger equations for isometric subspaces, in striking contrast with the usual quantization procedures which start from the classical Lagrangian of the constrained system.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1982•141 citations

Schrödinger equation for the nonrelativistic particle constrained on a hypersurface in a curved space

Takahiro Homma, Tadashi Inamoto, Tadashi Miyazaki

Dirac-bracket quantization of the nonrelativistic particle whose motion is constrained on the hypersurface f(x)=const embedded in a general curved space is discussed. The noncanonical nature of commutation relations makes it difficult to obtain the coordinate representation. Then the system with the derivative-type constraint df(x)/dt=0 is alternatively quantized, treating carefully the operator-ordering problem. In this system it is shown that there exist no constraints on coordinates and momenta and that one can thus have a straightforward representation, which leads, in turn, to the representation and the Schr\"odinger equation in the former system.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Sep 15, 1990•33 citations

Quantum dynamics of a particle constrained to lie on a surface

Gustavo de Oliveira

We consider the quantum dynamics of a charged particle in Euclidean space subjected to electric and magnetic fields under the presence of a potential that forces the particle to stay close to a compact surface. We prove that, as the strength of this constraining potential tends to infinity, the motion of this particle converges to a motion generated by a Hamiltonian over the surface superimposed by an oscillatory motion in the normal directions. Our result extends previous results by allowing magnetic potentials and more general constraining potentials.

arXiv:1310.6651•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 2014•12 citations

Constrained dynamics for quantum mechanics. I. Restricting a particle to a surface

Hendrik Grundling, C. A. Hurst

We analyze constrained quantum systems where the dynamics do not preserve the constraints. This is done, in particular, for the restriction of a quantum particle in Rn to a curved submanifold, and we propose a method of constraining and dynamics adjustment that produces the right Hamiltonian on the submanifold when tested on known examples. This method will be the germ of a “Dirac algorithm for quantum constraints.” We generalize it to the situation where the constraint is a general self-adjoint operator with some additional structures.

arXiv:hep-th/9712052•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1998•14 citations
When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.
When quantum mechanical motion of a particle constrained to a curved surface in the Euclidean space is considered, three different approaches may be adopted to describe the system. One is the confining approach which enforces a particle to stay in the surface by a physical confining potential. Both of the others follow Dirac's general prescription to treat a constrained system, but employ different constraints, namely the usual and the conservative constraints, respectively. The three approaches lead to results which do not in general agree with each other, though they give the same classical equation of motion. It is emphasized that the arbitrariness in the ordering of operators cannot be avoided when the latter two approaches are adopted. In the approach with the conservative constraint, however, there is a physical ordering, which leads to the result in agreement with that of the confining approach. We interpret these discrepancy and agreement in simple physical terms.
The motion of a particle rigidly bounded to a surface is discussed, considering the Schr\"odinger equation of a free particle constrained to move, by the action of an external potential, in an infinitely thin sheet of the ordinary three-dimensional space. Contrary to what seems to be the general belief expressed in the literature, this limiting process gives a perfectly well-defined result, provided that we take some simple precautions in the definition of the potentials and wave functions. It can then be shown that the wave function splits into two parts: the normal part, which contains the infinite energies required by the uncertainty principle, and a tangent part which contains "surface potentials" depending both on the Gaussian and mean curvatures. An immediate consequence of these results is the existence of different quantum mechanical properties for two isometric surfaces, as can be seen from the bound state which appears along the edge of a folded (but not stretched) plane. The fact that this surface potential is not a bending invariant (cannot be expressed as a function of the components of the metric tensor and their derivatives) is also interesting from the more general point of view of the quantum mechanics in curved spaces, since it can never be obtained from the classical Lagrangian of an a priori constrained particle without substantial modifications in the usual quantization procedures. Similar calculations are also presented for the case of a particle bounded to a curve. The properties of the constraining spatial potential, necessary to a meaningful limiting process, are discussed in some detail, and, as expected, the resulting Schr\"odinger equation contains a "linear potential" which is a function of the curvature.
We discuss the introduction of constraints in a system of n noninteracting particles which obey the laws of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper the particles are first thought of as being unconstrained (described by the 3n3n3n Cartesian coordinates of a flat space RRR), but subject to an external potential VVV which, in a certian suitable limit, forces the system to remain in a curved subspace VVV of RRR. This idea was already employed in a previous work where we have discussed the motion of one constrained particle. It was then shown that in order to obtain a meaningful result the particle wave function should be "uniformly compressed" into a surface (or curve), avoiding, in this way, the tangential forces which correspond to the dissipative constraints of classical mechanics. The resulting Schr\"odinger equation could then be separated in such a way that the part which contained the surface (or curve) variables was independent of the potential VVV employed in the constraining process. In the present paper we show that this procedure cannot be carried out for all subspaces VVV of RRR in the case of a many-particle system, unless VVV satisfies a certain geometrical condition. The many-particle Schr\"odinger equation (as was already the case of the one-particle systems) contains, besides the kinetic energy term, potentials which are not bending invariants, that is, cannot be obtained from the metric tensor gij{g}_{\mathrm{ij}}gij​ of VVV or its derivatives. This gives rise to different Schr\"odinger equations for isometric subspaces, in striking contrast with the usual quantization procedures which start from the classical Lagrangian of the constrained system.
Dirac-bracket quantization of the nonrelativistic particle whose motion is constrained on the hypersurface f(x)=const embedded in a general curved space is discussed. The noncanonical nature of commutation relations makes it difficult to obtain the coordinate representation. Then the system with the derivative-type constraint df(x)/dt=0 is alternatively quantized, treating carefully the operator-ordering problem. In this system it is shown that there exist no constraints on coordinates and momenta and that one can thus have a straightforward representation, which leads, in turn, to the representation and the Schr\"odinger equation in the former system.
We consider the quantum dynamics of a charged particle in Euclidean space subjected to electric and magnetic fields under the presence of a potential that forces the particle to stay close to a compact surface. We prove that, as the strength of this constraining potential tends to infinity, the motion of this particle converges to a motion generated by a Hamiltonian over the surface superimposed by an oscillatory motion in the normal directions. Our result extends previous results by allowing magnetic potentials and more general constraining potentials.
We analyze constrained quantum systems where the dynamics do not preserve the constraints. This is done, in particular, for the restriction of a quantum particle in Rn to a curved submanifold, and we propose a method of constraining and dynamics adjustment that produces the right Hamiltonian on the submanifold when tested on known examples. This method will be the germ of a “Dirac algorithm for quantum constraints.” We generalize it to the situation where the constraint is a general self-adjoint operator with some additional structures.