Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B, Solid state

Order in metallic chains. I. The single chain

Hanoch Gutfreund, Richard A. Klemm

Published Aug 1, 1976• 56 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The nature of the order as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ in the one-dimensional interacting electron gas is investigated. We consider both low-momentum-transfer (${g}_{2}$ and ${g}_{4}$) and large-momentum-transfer (${g}_{1}$ and ${g}_{3}$) electron-electron interactions, focusing upon the particular value of ${g}_{1}$ for which Luther and Emery have recently found an exact solution. For this value of ${g}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}\frac{6}{5\ensuremath{\pi}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{F}}$, we calculate the low-frequency behavior of the zero-temperature response functions explicitly. For the singlet superconducting and charge-density-wave responses, our results are consistent with those of Luther and Emery, implying that these response functions are divergent as $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ for certain values of ${g}_{2}$. For the triplet superconducting and spin-density-wave responses, however, our results differ from those of Luther and Emery, as we show explicitly that these responses have a gap for low frequencies, as was predicted by Lee. Furthermore, they do not diverge at the gap edge for any value of ${g}_{2}$. We also consider the effect of interactions between electrons on the same side of the Fermi "surface," and find that the low-momentum-transfer process of that type (${g}_{4}$) does not change the response behavior qualitatively. For the large-momentum-transfer process between electrons on the same side of the Fermi "surface" (${g}_{3}$), we may solve the problem exactly for ${g}_{2}=0$ and ${g}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}\frac{6}{5\ensuremath{\pi}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{F}}$, and find that the ground state of the system exhibits only long-range charge-density-wave order. By a mapping onto the classical two-dimensional Coulomb gas problem, we may extend those results for ${g}_{3}\ensuremath{\ne}0$ to the region ${g}_{1}<0$ and ${g}_{1}\ensuremath{-}2{g}_{2}<|{g}_{3}|$.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.14.1073

Related papers

Response behavior of the two-chain Fermi gas

Richard A. Klemm

We consider a model of TTF-TCNQ (tetrahiafulvalenium-tetracyanoquinodimethanide) and similar charge-transfer linear conductors in which there are two chains. The electrons on the acceptor (TCNQ) chains have a usual metallic band, but the electrons on the donor (TTF) chains have an inverted or "hole" band. The electrons on each chain interact via the forward and backward scattering ${g}_{2}$ and ${g}_{1}$ processes, respectively. Electrons on different chains interact via the analogous processes ${W}_{2}$ and ${W}_{1}$. The model is also applicable to two metallic chains, with the signs of ${W}_{1}$ and ${W}_{2}$ reversed. Using the techniques of Luther and Emery and of Chui and Lee we show that the problem may be mapped onto a similar problem of three coupled classical two-dimensional Coulomb gases. In addition to gaps in the spin degrees of freedom that were present in the single-chain problem, we find that the antisymmetric form of the resultant charge degrees of freedom may have a gap. We then investigate the predominant two-, four-, six-, and eight-particle response functions and calculate their temperature dependence. In addition to the four divergent two-particle response functions present in the single chain, there is a region for weak interaction strengths in which the $2{k}_{F}$ interchain Cooper pairing response is the most divergent as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. The excitonic insulator response may also be important at high temperatures. For the single chain, either the $4{k}_{F}$ response or a four-particle $q=0$ response is the most divergent for strong coupling and repulsive ${g}_{1}$, depending upon the sign of ${g}_{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}{g}_{1}$. For the two-chain system, the most divergent response as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ for strongly attractive interactions (${g}_{1}$ and ${g}_{2}$) is the response to the formation of excitonic "molecules" or exciton pairs. For strong coupling and repulsive ${g}_{1}$ either $8{k}_{F}$ or octet responses may be observable. We discuss these results in conjunction with our previous renormalization-group treatment, which indicates that for certain values of ${g}_{2}$, ${W}_{2}$, and ${W}_{1}$ the line ${g}_{1}=0$ may be crossed. We use these results to interpret the recent x-ray data on TTF-TCNQ showing a crossover from $4{k}_{F}$ to $2{k}_{F}$ behavior above the crossover from one-dimensional to three-dimensional behavior.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Aug 1, 1979•6 citations

Some properties of the one-dimensional Fermi model

Hiroyuki Fukuyama, Thomas Maurice Rice, Chandra Mohan Varma +1 more

A model of one-dimensional fermions characterized by a large momentum-transfer interaction ${g}_{1}$ and a small momentum-transfer interaction ${g}_{2}$ is considered. Results obtained previously by the renormalization-group method are extended by studying the triplet Cooper-pair response function and uniform charge and spin response functions. The sign of ${g}_{1}$ dominates the behavior of the system. For ${g}_{1}>0$, ${g}_{1}\ensuremath{-}2{g}_{2}>0$ the triplet Cooper response diverges as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ and is seen to dominate the singlet Cooper response which is also divergent. The uniform static spin susceptibility is nondivergent for ${g}_{1}>0$ and diverges to zero for ${g}_{1}<0$. The specific heat is found to be linear in temperature in all regions. These results, obtained by the second-order renormalization group, yield the correct qualitative results in regions where exact solutions are available.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Nov 1, 1974•53 citations

Comments on a Solution of a One-Dimensional Fermi-Gas Model

Patrick A. Lee

A recent solution by Luther and Emery of a one-dimensional interacting Fermi-gas model contains a flaw in its final step which when corrected yields qualitatively different behavior. In particular spin-density wave and triplet superconducting pairing excitations are not divergent. The result is consistent with a gap in the uniform spin susceptibility and the gap can now be given a simple physical interpretation. The bulk of the Luther-Emery solution including exponents for the charge-density wave and singlet pairing remains correct.

Physical Review Letters•May 12, 1975•75 citations

The Fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors

Jenő Sólyom

The Fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors is reviewed. The exact solutions known for particular values of the coupling constants in a single chain problem (Tomonaga model, Luther-Emery model) are discussed. Renormalization group arguments are used to extend these solutions to arbitrary values of the couplings. The instabilities and possible ground states are studied by investigating the behaviour of the response functions. The relationship between this model and others is discussed and is used to obtain further information about the behaviour of the system. The model is generalized to a set of coupled chains to describe quasi-one-dimensional systems. The crossover from one-dimensional to three-dimensional behaviour and the type of ordering are discussed.

Advances In Physics•Apr 1, 1979•1,749 citations

Solution of the one-dimensional electron gas on a lattice

Victor J. Emery, Alan H. Luther, Ingo Peschel

An exact solution of the one-dimensional electron gas on a lattice is given for the special case in which two of the four coupling constants have particular values. It is shown that umklapp scattering has the same effect on the charge-density waves as backward scattering across the Fermi "surface" has on the spin-density waves and that the method of Luther and Emery can be used to solve this more general problem. For repulsive electron-electron interactions the umklapp scattering produces a gap in the charge-density wave spectrum and this appears for low-lying excitations when there is a half-filled band. The use of renormalization-group scaling to solve for general values of the coupling constants is discussed.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Feb 1, 1976•91 citations

Finite-size effects in Luther-Emery phases of Holstein and Hubbard models

Jonas Greitemann, Stephan Heßelmann, Stefan Weßel +2 more

The one-dimensional Holstein model and its generalizations have been studied extensively to understand the effects of electron-phonon interaction. The half-filled case is of particular interest, as it describes a transition from a metallic phase with a spin gap due to attractive backscattering to a Peierls insulator with charge-density-wave order. Our quantum Monte Carlo results support the existence of a metallic phase with dominant power-law charge correlations, as described by the Luther-Emery fixed point. We demonstrate that for Holstein and also for purely fermionic models the spin gap significantly complicates finite-size numerical studies, and explains inconsistent previous results for Luttinger parameters and phase boundaries. On the other hand, no such complications arise in spinless models. The correct low-energy theory of the spinful Holstein model is argued to be that of singlet bipolarons with a repulsive, mutual interaction. This picture naturally explains the existence of a metallic phase, but also implies that gapless Luttinger liquid theory is not applicable.

arXiv:1510.07454•Physical Review B•Dec 28, 2015•25 citations
The nature of the order as T\ensuremath→0T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0T\ensuremath→0 in the one-dimensional interacting electron gas is investigated. We consider both low-momentum-transfer (g2{g}_{2}g2​ and g4{g}_{4}g4​) and large-momentum-transfer (g1{g}_{1}g1​ and g3{g}_{3}g3​) electron-electron interactions, focusing upon the particular value of g1{g}_{1}g1​ for which Luther and Emery have recently found an exact solution. For this value of g1=\ensuremath−65\ensuremathπ\ensuremathνF{g}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}\frac{6}{5\ensuremath{\pi}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{F}}g1​=\ensuremath−5\ensuremathπ\ensuremathνF​6​, we calculate the low-frequency behavior of the zero-temperature response functions explicitly. For the singlet superconducting and charge-density-wave responses, our results are consistent with those of Luther and Emery, implying that these response functions are divergent as \ensuremathω\ensuremath→0\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0\ensuremathω\ensuremath→0 for certain values of g2{g}_{2}g2​. For the triplet superconducting and spin-density-wave responses, however, our results differ from those of Luther and Emery, as we show explicitly that these responses have a gap for low frequencies, as was predicted by Lee. Furthermore, they do not diverge at the gap edge for any value of g2{g}_{2}g2​. We also consider the effect of interactions between electrons on the same side of the Fermi "surface," and find that the low-momentum-transfer process of that type (g4{g}_{4}g4​) does not change the response behavior qualitatively. For the large-momentum-transfer process between electrons on the same side of the Fermi "surface" (g3{g}_{3}g3​), we may solve the problem exactly for g2=0{g}_{2}=0g2​=0 and g1=\ensuremath−65\ensuremathπ\ensuremathνF{g}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}\frac{6}{5\ensuremath{\pi}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{F}}g1​=\ensuremath−5\ensuremathπ\ensuremathνF​6​, and find that the ground state of the system exhibits only long-range charge-density-wave order. By a mapping onto the classical two-dimensional Coulomb gas problem, we may extend those results for g3\ensuremath≠0{g}_{3}\ensuremath{\ne}0g3​\ensuremath=0 to the region g1<0{g}_{1}<0g1​<0 and g1\ensuremath−2g2<∣g3∣{g}_{1}\ensuremath{-}2{g}_{2}<|{g}_{3}|g1​\ensuremath−2g2​<∣g3​∣.
We consider a model of TTF-TCNQ (tetrahiafulvalenium-tetracyanoquinodimethanide) and similar charge-transfer linear conductors in which there are two chains. The electrons on the acceptor (TCNQ) chains have a usual metallic band, but the electrons on the donor (TTF) chains have an inverted or "hole" band. The electrons on each chain interact via the forward and backward scattering g2{g}_{2}g2​ and g1{g}_{1}g1​ processes, respectively. Electrons on different chains interact via the analogous processes W2{W}_{2}W2​ and W1{W}_{1}W1​. The model is also applicable to two metallic chains, with the signs of W1{W}_{1}W1​ and W2{W}_{2}W2​ reversed. Using the techniques of Luther and Emery and of Chui and Lee we show that the problem may be mapped onto a similar problem of three coupled classical two-dimensional Coulomb gases. In addition to gaps in the spin degrees of freedom that were present in the single-chain problem, we find that the antisymmetric form of the resultant charge degrees of freedom may have a gap. We then investigate the predominant two-, four-, six-, and eight-particle response functions and calculate their temperature dependence. In addition to the four divergent two-particle response functions present in the single chain, there is a region for weak interaction strengths in which the 2kF2{k}_{F}2kF​ interchain Cooper pairing response is the most divergent as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. The excitonic insulator response may also be important at high temperatures. For the single chain, either the 4kF4{k}_{F}4kF​ response or a four-particle q=0q=0q=0 response is the most divergent for strong coupling and repulsive g1{g}_{1}g1​, depending upon the sign of ${g}_{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}{g}_{1}$. For the two-chain system, the most divergent response as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ for strongly attractive interactions (g1{g}_{1}g1​ and g2{g}_{2}g2​) is the response to the formation of excitonic "molecules" or exciton pairs. For strong coupling and repulsive g1{g}_{1}g1​ either 8kF8{k}_{F}8kF​ or octet responses may be observable. We discuss these results in conjunction with our previous renormalization-group treatment, which indicates that for certain values of g2{g}_{2}g2​, W2{W}_{2}W2​, and W1{W}_{1}W1​ the line g1=0{g}_{1}=0g1​=0 may be crossed. We use these results to interpret the recent x-ray data on TTF-TCNQ showing a crossover from 4kF4{k}_{F}4kF​ to 2kF2{k}_{F}2kF​ behavior above the crossover from one-dimensional to three-dimensional behavior.
A model of one-dimensional fermions characterized by a large momentum-transfer interaction g1{g}_{1}g1​ and a small momentum-transfer interaction g2{g}_{2}g2​ is considered. Results obtained previously by the renormalization-group method are extended by studying the triplet Cooper-pair response function and uniform charge and spin response functions. The sign of g1{g}_{1}g1​ dominates the behavior of the system. For g1>0{g}_{1}>0g1​>0, ${g}_{1}\ensuremath{-}2{g}_{2}>0$ the triplet Cooper response diverges as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$ and is seen to dominate the singlet Cooper response which is also divergent. The uniform static spin susceptibility is nondivergent for g1>0{g}_{1}>0g1​>0 and diverges to zero for g1<0{g}_{1}<0g1​<0. The specific heat is found to be linear in temperature in all regions. These results, obtained by the second-order renormalization group, yield the correct qualitative results in regions where exact solutions are available.
A recent solution by Luther and Emery of a one-dimensional interacting Fermi-gas model contains a flaw in its final step which when corrected yields qualitatively different behavior. In particular spin-density wave and triplet superconducting pairing excitations are not divergent. The result is consistent with a gap in the uniform spin susceptibility and the gap can now be given a simple physical interpretation. The bulk of the Luther-Emery solution including exponents for the charge-density wave and singlet pairing remains correct.
The Fermi gas model of one-dimensional conductors is reviewed. The exact solutions known for particular values of the coupling constants in a single chain problem (Tomonaga model, Luther-Emery model) are discussed. Renormalization group arguments are used to extend these solutions to arbitrary values of the couplings. The instabilities and possible ground states are studied by investigating the behaviour of the response functions. The relationship between this model and others is discussed and is used to obtain further information about the behaviour of the system. The model is generalized to a set of coupled chains to describe quasi-one-dimensional systems. The crossover from one-dimensional to three-dimensional behaviour and the type of ordering are discussed.
An exact solution of the one-dimensional electron gas on a lattice is given for the special case in which two of the four coupling constants have particular values. It is shown that umklapp scattering has the same effect on the charge-density waves as backward scattering across the Fermi "surface" has on the spin-density waves and that the method of Luther and Emery can be used to solve this more general problem. For repulsive electron-electron interactions the umklapp scattering produces a gap in the charge-density wave spectrum and this appears for low-lying excitations when there is a half-filled band. The use of renormalization-group scaling to solve for general values of the coupling constants is discussed.
The one-dimensional Holstein model and its generalizations have been studied extensively to understand the effects of electron-phonon interaction. The half-filled case is of particular interest, as it describes a transition from a metallic phase with a spin gap due to attractive backscattering to a Peierls insulator with charge-density-wave order. Our quantum Monte Carlo results support the existence of a metallic phase with dominant power-law charge correlations, as described by the Luther-Emery fixed point. We demonstrate that for Holstein and also for purely fermionic models the spin gap significantly complicates finite-size numerical studies, and explains inconsistent previous results for Luttinger parameters and phase boundaries. On the other hand, no such complications arise in spinless models. The correct low-energy theory of the spinful Holstein model is argued to be that of singlet bipolarons with a repulsive, mutual interaction. This picture naturally explains the existence of a metallic phase, but also implies that gapless Luttinger liquid theory is not applicable.