Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Geometry and Physics

A geometrical setting for geometric phases on complex Grassmann manifolds

Maria Cristina Abbati, Alessandro Manià

Published Jul 25, 2006• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.06.002

Related papers

Geometric phase for mixed states: Formulation based on a connection on a vector bundle over a Grassmann manifold

Hayato Goto, Kouichi Ichimura

A geometrical description of open quantum systems is presented. This is based on a connection on a vector bundle over a Grassmann manifold, as well as the Anandan geometric phase for pure states [J. Anandan, Phys. Lett. A 133, 171 (1988)]. The geometric phase proposed here also naturally includes the geometric phase in adiabatic open quantum systems proposed by Sarandy and Lidar [Phys. Rev. A 73, 062101 (2006)]. The present geometrical description can be applied to all the quantum systems described by time-local master equations for density operators.

Physical Review A•Jul 27, 2007•9 citations

A group theoretic treatment of the geometric phase

E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Anandan, T. R. Govindarajan

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 1992•9 citations

Manifestations of quantum holonomy in interferometry

Erik Sjöqvist, David Kult, Johan Åberg

Abelian and non-Abelian geometric phases, known as quantum holonomies, have attracted considerable attention in the past. Here, we show that it is possible to associate nonequivalent holonomies to discrete sequences of subspaces in a Hilbert space. We consider two such holonomies that arise naturally in interferometer settings. For sequences approximating smooth paths in the base (Grassmann) manifold, these holonomies both approach the standard holonomy. In the one-dimensional case the two types of holonomies are Abelian and coincide with Pancharatnam's geometric phase factor. The theory is illustrated with a model example of projective measurements involving angular momentum coherent states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0607198•Physical Review A•Dec 1, 2006•9 citations

A Non-Abelian Geometric Phase for Spin Systems

Bharath Hebbe Madhusudhana, Matthew Boguslawski, Maryrose Barrios +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2017•0 citations

Geometric Phase in Eigenspace Evolution of Invariant and Adiabatic Action Operators

Jeffrey C. Y. Teo, Z. D. Wang

The theory of geometric phase is generalized to a cyclic evolution of the eigenspace of an invariant operator with N-fold degeneracy. The corresponding geometric phase is interpreted as a holonomy inherited from the universal Stiefel U(N) bundle over a Grassmann manifold. Most significantly, for an arbitrary initial state, this holonomy captures the inherent geometric feature of the state evolution that may not be cyclic. Moreover, a rigorous theory of geometric phase in the evolution of the eigenspace of an adiabatic action operator is also formulated, with the corresponding holonomy being elaborated by a pullback U(N) bundle.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502168•Physical Review Letters•Jul 29, 2005•9 citations

GEOMETRIC PHASES IN QUANTUM THEORY

At Wien

•Jan 1, 2002•34 citations
A geometrical description of open quantum systems is presented. This is based on a connection on a vector bundle over a Grassmann manifold, as well as the Anandan geometric phase for pure states [J. Anandan, Phys. Lett. A 133, 171 (1988)]. The geometric phase proposed here also naturally includes the geometric phase in adiabatic open quantum systems proposed by Sarandy and Lidar [Phys. Rev. A 73, 062101 (2006)]. The present geometrical description can be applied to all the quantum systems described by time-local master equations for density operators.
Abelian and non-Abelian geometric phases, known as quantum holonomies, have attracted considerable attention in the past. Here, we show that it is possible to associate nonequivalent holonomies to discrete sequences of subspaces in a Hilbert space. We consider two such holonomies that arise naturally in interferometer settings. For sequences approximating smooth paths in the base (Grassmann) manifold, these holonomies both approach the standard holonomy. In the one-dimensional case the two types of holonomies are Abelian and coincide with Pancharatnam's geometric phase factor. The theory is illustrated with a model example of projective measurements involving angular momentum coherent states.
The theory of geometric phase is generalized to a cyclic evolution of the eigenspace of an invariant operator with N-fold degeneracy. The corresponding geometric phase is interpreted as a holonomy inherited from the universal Stiefel U(N) bundle over a Grassmann manifold. Most significantly, for an arbitrary initial state, this holonomy captures the inherent geometric feature of the state evolution that may not be cyclic. Moreover, a rigorous theory of geometric phase in the evolution of the eigenspace of an adiabatic action operator is also formulated, with the corresponding holonomy being elaborated by a pullback U(N) bundle.