American Journal of Physics

Response to ‘‘Comment on ‘Bell’s theorem and the foundation of quantum physics’ ’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 5, 1142 (1987)]

Henry Pierce Stapp

Published Dec 1, 1987• 0 citations

Publisher

Abstract

The principle of EPR locality is discussed. (AIP) e

DOI: 10.1119/1.15266

Related papers

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Bell’s theorem and the foundations of quantum physics’ ’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 6, 567 (1988)]

Henry Pierce Stapp

EPR locality is discussed from the point of view of determinism. (AIP)

American Journal of PhysicsJun 1, 19883 citations

Comment on ‘‘Bell’s theorem and the foundations of quantum physics’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 3, 306 (1985)]

Allen C. Dotson

American Journal of PhysicsDec 1, 19870 citations

Comment on ‘‘Bell’s theorem and the foundations of quantum physics’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 3, 306 (1985)]

Frederick Fellows

American Journal of PhysicsJun 1, 19883 citations

Reply to ‘‘Note on ‘Bell’s theorem and the foundation of quantum physics’ ’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 6, 565 (1988)]

Henry Pierce Stapp

American Journal of PhysicsJun 1, 19884 citations

Note on ‘‘Bell’s theorem and the foundations of quantum physics’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 3, 306 (1985)]

Reed A. Guy, Robert J. Deltete

American Journal of PhysicsJun 1, 19883 citations

Yet another comment on "Nonlocal character of quantum theory"

J. Finkelstein

There has been considerable discussion of the claim by Stapp [Am. J. Phys. 65, 300 (1997)] that quantum theory is incompatible with locality. In this note I analyze the meaning of some of the statements used in this discussion.

arXiv:quant-ph/9801011Jan 7, 199810 citations