Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

A new consequence of electron diffraction

Clinton J. Davisson

Published Feb 1, 1952• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

When we have heard of a person for years, physicist or other, we want to know more about him. In our human way, we want to know about his personal qualities as well as his public accomplishments. How are most of us to find out? By reading, of course.
DOI
10.1063/1.3067508

Related papers

A Physicist’s Perspective on How One Converts Observation into Information

Robert W. Johnson

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 28, 2017•0 citations

A Backward Look to the Future

E. T. Jaynes

. We survey briefly some fifty years of thinking about physics and probability with the aim of explaining: (1) What I did not know then, but know now; (2) What I have been trying to accomplish in science and education, and to what extent these efforts have succeeded; (3) What remains unfinished, but where I think the greatest future opportunities lie; and (4) What personal and professional advice I can now give to young people (and wish someone had given me fifty years ago). Introduction A meeting like this is an overwhelming experience! I was overwhelmed not only by the sheer number of people who came here from so far; but even more by the kind sentiments expressed. Of course, I had looked forward to seeing again many former students and colleagues and had expected to have chats with each one, to renew our friendship and bring us both up to date about the other's work. But what one can actually do in two days is so helplessly short of what one wants to do! Some of the participants ha...

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 2, 1993•22 citations

Quantum Mechanics Is Not That Hard to Understand

Alexander Turishchev

In this text, I don’t want to add anything new to quantum mechanics.I just want to help people understand it, to make learning a little easier.For example, a child, a teenager, or anyone curious about the subject — they want to know and understand.But right now, quantum mechanics is presented in such a way that after reading, a person still can’t find a simple answer to the question: “what actually is this?”That’s why I want to make it easier for everyone who wants to understand.

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations

Properties of matter?some quantum explanations, mainly about the behaviour of electrons in matter

Institute of Physics eBooks•Nov 26, 2004•0 citations

Foreword: an apology

Gerard ’t Hooft

It is difficult to venture into the world of the ultimately small, or even to talk about it, without a very good understanding of the laws of Nature that govern that world. The forces one finds there determine the way in which the tiny particles we wish to study move about, and also all their other properties. Whether, and how, we can actually observe them will also depend on these forces. And this is not easy, because the laws of Nature are complicated. More and more experts in this field seek refuge in a kind of mathematical gibberish no ‘normal’ person can follow, unless he or she belongs to the in-crowd. To really appreciate the rock-solid logic of the laws of physics, one actually cannot avoid math. Nonetheless, we physicists feel the need to share the joy of all our beautiful discoveries with whoever wants to listen. We are advised then to avoid all math. This then is what I shall reluctantly do. It is my intention to provide a narrative of twenty-five years of research on the very tiniest particles of matter. During those twenty-five years, I began to view Nature as an intelligence test to which humanity as a whole has been subjected, as a giant jigsaw puzzle given to us to play with. Time and again, we stumble upon new pieces, large or small, that fit beautifully with those we already have. I want to share with you the sense of triumph we feel at such moments.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 1996•0 citations

Must Nature's Behavior Be Limited by the Present (1999) Understanding of Physicists?

Damian Canals‐Frau

Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2000•0 citations
. We survey briefly some fifty years of thinking about physics and probability with the aim of explaining: (1) What I did not know then, but know now; (2) What I have been trying to accomplish in science and education, and to what extent these efforts have succeeded; (3) What remains unfinished, but where I think the greatest future opportunities lie; and (4) What personal and professional advice I can now give to young people (and wish someone had given me fifty years ago). Introduction A meeting like this is an overwhelming experience! I was overwhelmed not only by the sheer number of people who came here from so far; but even more by the kind sentiments expressed. Of course, I had looked forward to seeing again many former students and colleagues and had expected to have chats with each one, to renew our friendship and bring us both up to date about the other's work. But what one can actually do in two days is so helplessly short of what one wants to do! Some of the participants ha...
It is difficult to venture into the world of the ultimately small, or even to talk about it, without a very good understanding of the laws of Nature that govern that world. The forces one finds there determine the way in which the tiny particles we wish to study move about, and also all their other properties. Whether, and how, we can actually observe them will also depend on these forces. And this is not easy, because the laws of Nature are complicated. More and more experts in this field seek refuge in a kind of mathematical gibberish no ‘normal’ person can follow, unless he or she belongs to the in-crowd. To really appreciate the rock-solid logic of the laws of physics, one actually cannot avoid math. Nonetheless, we physicists feel the need to share the joy of all our beautiful discoveries with whoever wants to listen. We are advised then to avoid all math. This then is what I shall reluctantly do. It is my intention to provide a narrative of twenty-five years of research on the very tiniest particles of matter. During those twenty-five years, I began to view Nature as an intelligence test to which humanity as a whole has been subjected, as a giant jigsaw puzzle given to us to play with. Time and again, we stumble upon new pieces, large or small, that fit beautifully with those we already have. I want to share with you the sense of triumph we feel at such moments.