Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures

Random-matrix model for quantum Brownian motion

Eric Lutz

Published Mar 1, 2001• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s1386-9477(00)00230-7

Related papers

Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator and random walk in phase space

Eugen Merzbacher

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Apr 1, 1979•4 citations

On the theory of quantum brownian motion

R.F Roose, R. Dagonnier

Physica•Feb 1, 1972•0 citations

Random matrix approach to quantum adiabatic evolution algorithms

A. Boulatov, Vadim Smelyanskiy

We analyze the power of the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm (QAA) for solving random computationally hard optimization problems within a theoretical framework based on random matrix theory (RMT). We present two types of driven RMT models. In the first model, the driving Hamiltonian is represented by Brownian motion in the matrix space. We use the Brownian motion model to obtain a description of multiple avoided crossing phenomena. We show that nonadiabatic corrections in the QAA are due to the interaction of the ground state with the ``cloud'' formed by most of the excited states, confirming that in driven RMT models, the Landau-Zener scenario of pairwise level repulsions is not relevant for the description of nonadiabatic corrections. We show that the QAA has a finite probability of success in a certain range of parameters, implying a polynomial complexity of the algorithm. The second model corresponds to the standard QAA with the problem Hamiltonian taken from the RMT Gaussian unitary ensemble (GUE). We show that the level dynamics in this model can be mapped onto the dynamics in the Brownian motion model. For this reason, the driven GUE model can also lead to polynomial complexity of the QAA. The main contribution to the failure probability of the QAA comes from the nonadiabatic corrections to the eigenstates, which only depend on the absolute values of the transition amplitudes. Due to the mapping between the two models, these absolute values are the same in both cases. Our results indicate that this ``phase irrelevance'' is the leading effect that can make both the Markovian- and GUE-type QAAs successful.

Physical Review A•May 6, 2005•4 citations

Can the Schrodinger dynamics explain measurement?

Alexey A. Kryukov

The motion of a ball through an appropriate lattice of round obstacles models the behavior of a Brownian particle and can be used to describe measurement on a macro system. On another hand, such motion is chaotic and a known conjecture asserts that the Hamiltonian of the corresponding quantum system must follow the random matrix statistics of an appropriate ensemble. We use the Hamiltonian represented by a random matrix in the Gaussian unitary ensemble to study the Schrödinger evolution of non-stationary states. For Gaussian states representing a classical system, the Brownian motion that describes the behavior of the system under measurement is obtained. For general quantum states, the Born rule for the probability of transition between states is derived. It is then shown that the Schrödinger evolution with such a Hamiltonian models measurement on macroscopic and microscopic systems, provides an explanation for the classical behavior of macroscopic bodies and for irreversibility of a measurement, and identifies the boundary between micro and macro worlds.

arXiv:2301.01858•Jan 5, 2023•0 citations

Brownian motion of quantum particles

V. I. Mel'Nikov, S. V. Meshkov

•Aug 1, 1983•1 citation

Quantum Brownian Motion Revisited

Aniello Lampo, Miguel Ángel García March, Maciej Lewenstein

SpringerBriefs in physics•Jan 1, 2019•18 citations
We analyze the power of the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm (QAA) for solving random computationally hard optimization problems within a theoretical framework based on random matrix theory (RMT). We present two types of driven RMT models. In the first model, the driving Hamiltonian is represented by Brownian motion in the matrix space. We use the Brownian motion model to obtain a description of multiple avoided crossing phenomena. We show that nonadiabatic corrections in the QAA are due to the interaction of the ground state with the ``cloud'' formed by most of the excited states, confirming that in driven RMT models, the Landau-Zener scenario of pairwise level repulsions is not relevant for the description of nonadiabatic corrections. We show that the QAA has a finite probability of success in a certain range of parameters, implying a polynomial complexity of the algorithm. The second model corresponds to the standard QAA with the problem Hamiltonian taken from the RMT Gaussian unitary ensemble (GUE). We show that the level dynamics in this model can be mapped onto the dynamics in the Brownian motion model. For this reason, the driven GUE model can also lead to polynomial complexity of the QAA. The main contribution to the failure probability of the QAA comes from the nonadiabatic corrections to the eigenstates, which only depend on the absolute values of the transition amplitudes. Due to the mapping between the two models, these absolute values are the same in both cases. Our results indicate that this ``phase irrelevance'' is the leading effect that can make both the Markovian- and GUE-type QAAs successful.
The motion of a ball through an appropriate lattice of round obstacles models the behavior of a Brownian particle and can be used to describe measurement on a macro system. On another hand, such motion is chaotic and a known conjecture asserts that the Hamiltonian of the corresponding quantum system must follow the random matrix statistics of an appropriate ensemble. We use the Hamiltonian represented by a random matrix in the Gaussian unitary ensemble to study the Schrödinger evolution of non-stationary states. For Gaussian states representing a classical system, the Brownian motion that describes the behavior of the system under measurement is obtained. For general quantum states, the Born rule for the probability of transition between states is derived. It is then shown that the Schrödinger evolution with such a Hamiltonian models measurement on macroscopic and microscopic systems, provides an explanation for the classical behavior of macroscopic bodies and for irreversibility of a measurement, and identifies the boundary between micro and macro worlds.