The many-Hilbert-space approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics is applied to a typical ``yes-no'' experiment relative to two branch routes corresponding to mutually exclusive propositions. First, we reformulate the notion of wave-function collapse by measurement as a dephasing process between the two branch waves of an interfering particle (from our own point of view as opposed to the conventional Copenhagen interpretation). In this way, the concept of ``wave-function collapse'' is replaced by that of a statistically defined dephasing process. One of the most important points of this paper is the introduction of an order parameter \ensuremath{\epsilon} that quantitatively describes the degree of decoherence. Its value ranges from \ensuremath{\epsilon}=0 (which describes the case in which the two waves are perfectly coherent) to \ensuremath{\epsilon}=1 (which describes the case in which coherence is totally lost); for this reason \ensuremath{\epsilon} is named the ``decoherence parameter.'' In terms of this parameter we formulate a definite criterion to judge whether an instrument works well or not as a measuring apparatus. Then, we study the interaction between a microscopic particle and a macroscopic system (a detector), by modeling the macrosystem with a linear array of complex \ensuremath{\delta} potentials, which undergo several kinds of statistical fluctuations. This leads us, under particular conditions, to the so-called wave-function collapse, which is attained in the limit \ensuremath{\epsilon}=1. We also examine in some detail which kind of elastic and/or inelastic collisions can give the wave-function collapse. Some connections with recent experimental results in neutron interferometry and quantum optics are also stressed.
The many-Hilbert-space approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics is applied to a typical yes-no'' experiment relative to two branch routes corresponding to mutually exclusive propositions. First, we reformulate the notion of wave-function collapse by measurement as a dephasing process between the two branch waves of an interfering particle (from our own point of view as opposed to the conventional Copenhagen interpretation). In this way, the concept of wave-function collapse'' is replaced by that of a statistically defined dephasing process. One of the most important points of this paper is the introduction of an order parameter \ensuremath{\epsilon} that quantitatively describes the degree of decoherence. Its value ranges from \ensuremath{\epsilon}=0 (which describes the case in which the two waves are perfectly coherent) to \ensuremath{\epsilon}=1 (which describes the case in which coherence is totally lost); for this reason \ensuremath{\epsilon} is named the ``decoherence parameter.'' In terms of this parameter we formulate a definite criterion to judge whether an instrument works well or not as a measuring apparatus. Then, we study the interaction between a microscopic particle and a macroscopic system (a detector), by modeling the macrosystem with a linear array of complex \ensuremath{\delta} potentials, which undergo several kinds of statistical fluctuations. This leads us, under particular conditions, to the so-called wave-function collapse, which is attained in the limit \ensuremath{\epsilon}=1. We also examine in some detail which kind of elastic and/or inelastic collisions can give the wave-function collapse. Some connections with recent experimental results in neutron interferometry and quantum optics are also stressed.
We discuss and clarify the concept of dephasing in the many-Hilbert-space approach to the quantum measurement problem. We argue that the phase randomization provoked by a detecting macroscopic device is responsible for the loss of quantum coherence, and that the ``collapse of the wave function'' is to be regarded as a statistical process for the accumulated distribution over many events. In stressing the fundamental differences between our approach and the Copenhagen interpretation, we counter the objections put forward by Johnston [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2497 (1993)], whose standpoint is essentially similar to the Copenhagen one.
A quantum-mechanical measurement process is analyzed in terms of a model Hamiltonian describing the interaction between a quantum system (a ``particle'') and a macroscopic apparatus (a ``detector''), which is assumed to be made up of N two-level elementary constituents (``molecules''). The description of the molecule locations introduces an effective fluctuating coupling constant, and this provokes a loss of quantum-mechanical coherence in the limit of large N. It is argued that coherence is lost statistically, as a result of the interaction: The collapse of the wave function is indeed obtained when the same experiment is performed many times, as a result of the microscopic differences among macroscopically identical initial states of the detector. In this way, insight is obtained into the mechanism engendering the loss of coherence suffered by a quantum-mechanical system when interacting with a macroscopic apparatus, and the concept of ``wave-function collapse'' is replaced by that of a statistically defined dephasing process. No classical behavior of the detection system is postulated and the presence of no external observer is required.
The act of measurement on a quantum state is supposed to "dephase" (dephasing refers to the phenomenon that the states lose phase coherence; then the phases get randomized in interaction with a bath of other oscillators, which is referred to as "decoherence"), then "decohere" and "collapse" (or more precisely "register" and "reduce") the state into one of several eigenstates of the operator corresponding to the observable being measured. This measurement process is sometimes described as outside standard quantum-mechanical evolution and not calculable from Schrödinger's equation. Progress has, however, been made in studying this problem with two main calculation tools-one uses a time-independent Hamiltonian, while a rather more general approach proving that decoherence occurs under some generic conditions. The two general approaches to the study of wave-function collapse are as follows. The first approach, called the "consistent" or "decoherent"' histories approach, studies microscopic histories that diverge probabilistically and explains collapse as an event in our particular history. The other, referred to as the "environmental decoherence" approach studies the effect of the environment upon the quantum system, to explain wave-function decoherence which is produced by irreversible effects of various sorts. However, as we know, wave-function collapse is not related to thermal connection with the environment, rather, it is inherent to how measurements are performed by macroscopic apparata. In the "environmental decoherence" approach, one studies decoherence using a Markovian-approximated Master equation to study the time-evolution of the reduced density matrix (post dephasing) and obtains the long-time dependence of the off-diagonal elements of this matrix. The calculation in this paper studies the evolution of a quantum system starting with "dephasing" followed by the effects of the environment with some differences from prior analyses. We start from the Schrödinger equation for the state of the system, with a time-dependent Hamiltonian that reflects the actual microscopic interactions that are occurring. Then we systematically solve (exactly) for the time-evolved state, without invoking a Markovian approximation when writing out the effective time-evolution equation, i.e., keeping the evolution unitary until the end. This approach is useful, and it shows that the system wave-function will explicitly "un-collapse" if the measurement apparatus is sufficiently small. However, in the limit of a macroscopic system, this "dephasing" quickly leads to "decoherence"-collapse is a temporary state that will simply take extremely long (of the order of multiple universe lifetimes) to reverse. This has been attempted previously and our calculation is particularly simple and calculable. We make some connections to the work by Linden et al. while doing so. The calculation in this paper has interesting implications for the interpretation of the Wigner's friend experiment, as well as the Mott experiment, which is explored in "Connection to some general theoretical results" and "Recurrence times" (especially the enumerated points in "Recurrence times"). The upshot is that as long as Wigner's friend is macroscopically large (or uses a macroscopically large measuring instrument), no one needs to worry that Wigner would see something different from his friend. Indeed, Wigner's friend does not even need to be conscious during the measurement that she conducts. It also allows one to reasonably interpret some of the more recent thought experiments proposed. In particular, as a result of the mathematical analysis, the short-time behavior of a collapsing system, at least the one considered in this paper, is not exponential. Instead, it is the usual Fermi-golden rule result. The long-term behavior is, of course, still exponential. This is a second novel feature of the paper-we connect the short-term Fermi-golden rule (quadratic-in-time behavior) transition probability to the exponential long-time behavior of a collapsing wave-function in one continuous mathematical formulation.
We numerically simulate the quantum measurement process by modeling the measuring apparatus as a one-dimensional Dirac comb that interacts with an incoming object particle. The global effect of the apparatus can be well schematized in terms of the total transmission probability and the decoherence parameter, which quantitatively characterizes the loss of quantum-mechanical coherence and the wave-function collapse by measurement. These two quantities alone enable one to judge whether the apparatus works well or not as a detection system. We derive simple theoretical formulas that are in excellent agreement with the numerical results, and can be very useful in order to make a ``design theory'' of a measuring system (detector). We also discuss some important characteristics of the wave-function collapse. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
The quantum measurement problem is one of the most fascinating and challenging topics in physics both theoretically and experimentally. It involves deep questions and the use of very sophisticated and elegant techniques. After analyzing the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and of the Copenhagen interpretation, this book reviews the most important approaches to the measurement problem and rigorously reformulates the "collapse of the wave function" by measurement, as a dephasing process quantitatively characterized by an order parameter (called the decoherence parameter), according to
At present, there are two possible, and equally plausible, explanations for the physics of quantum measurement. The first explanation, known as the many-worlds interpretation, does not require any modification of quantum mechanics, and asserts that at the time of measurement the Universe splits into many branches, one branch for every possible alternative. The various branches do not interfere with each other because of decoherence, thus providing a picture broadly consistent with the observed Universe. The second explanation, which requires quantum mechanics to be modified from its presently known form, is that at the time of measurement the wave-function collapses into one of the possible alternatives. The two explanations are mutually exclusive, and up until now, no theoretical reasoning has been put forward to choose one explanation over the other. In this article, we provide an argument which implies that the collapse interpretation is favored over the many-worlds interpretation. Our starting point is the assertion (which we justify) that there ought to exist a reformulation of quantum mechanics which does not refer to a classical spacetime manifold. The need for such a reformulation implies that quantum theory becomes non-linear on the Planck mass/energy scale. Standard linear quantum mechanics is an approximation to this non-linear theory, valid at energy scales much smaller than the Planck scale. Using ideas based on noncommutative | >=