Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Soviet Physics Uspekhi

Nonlocality in quantum physics

Б.И. Спасский, A.V. Moskovskii

Published Apr 30, 1984• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The nonlocality properties of quantum objects are considered for the example of the Aharonov–Bohm and Hanbury Brown-Twiss effects and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox.
DOI
10.1070/pu1984v027n04abeh004293

Related papers

On the relation between the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and the problem of nonlocality in quantum mechanics

Willem M. de Muynck

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1986•6 citations

Nonlocal Interconnectedness as a Fundamental Principle of Reality

Two significant principles of the 20th century are the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the nonlocality principles of the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen paradox [1]. Both these elements of quantum theory have major physical and philosophical implicatio like Bell’s Theorem and Space-Like Interconnect-edness and Other Collective Coherent Phenomena Involve nonlocality. We also present a discussion of the EPR paradox and other experiments that may demand a nonlocal explanation of the phenomenon they display.

Series on knots and everything•Mar 1, 2011•0 citations

Resolving the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, Bohm, and Aharonov Paradox with Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics… for Photons

Lincoln Stoller

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

More than one mystery: Quantum interference with correlated charged particles and magnetic fields

Mark P. Silverman

Examples of charged-particle interferometry are descibed whereby isolated magnetic fields—i.e., fields through which the particles do not pass—influence the clustering, as well as spatial distribution, of the particles. The configurations, which combine features characteristic of (i) Aharonov–Bohm and Hanbury Brown–Twiss experiments, and (ii) Aharonov–Bohm and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiments, manifest simultaneously the effects of three distinct kinds of interference: (i) interference, dependent upon optical path length difference, resulting from wavelike propagation of particles; (ii) interference, dependent upon confined magnetic flux, resulting from particle charge and spatial topology; and (iii) interference, dependent upon quantum statistics, resulting from particle indistinguishability under exchange.

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1993•12 citations

Nonlocality and quantum mechanics

Saverio Pascazio

A class of nonlocal hidden variable theories is shown to be incompatible with quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1012.5810•Dec 28, 2010•1 citation

Two-Particle Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Entanglement in the Electronic Hanbury Brown–Twiss Setup

Peter Samuelsson, Eugene V. Sukhorukov, Μ. Büttiker

We analyze a Hanbury Brown-Twiss geometry in which particles are injected from two independent sources into a mesoscopic conductor in the quantum Hall regime. All partial waves end in different reservoirs without generating any single-particle interference; in particular, there is no single-particle Aharonov-Bohm effect. However, exchange effects lead to two-particle Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in the zero-frequency current cross correlations. We demonstrate that this is related to two-particle orbital entanglement, detected via violation of a Bell inequality. The transport is along edge states and only adiabatic quantum point contacts and normal reservoirs are employed.

arXiv:cond-mat/0307473•Physical Review Letters•Jan 15, 2004•281 citations
Two significant principles of the 20th century are the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the nonlocality principles of the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen paradox [1]. Both these elements of quantum theory have major physical and philosophical implicatio like Bell’s Theorem and Space-Like Interconnect-edness and Other Collective Coherent Phenomena Involve nonlocality. We also present a discussion of the EPR paradox and other experiments that may demand a nonlocal explanation of the phenomenon they display.
Examples of charged-particle interferometry are descibed whereby isolated magnetic fields—i.e., fields through which the particles do not pass—influence the clustering, as well as spatial distribution, of the particles. The configurations, which combine features characteristic of (i) Aharonov–Bohm and Hanbury Brown–Twiss experiments, and (ii) Aharonov–Bohm and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiments, manifest simultaneously the effects of three distinct kinds of interference: (i) interference, dependent upon optical path length difference, resulting from wavelike propagation of particles; (ii) interference, dependent upon confined magnetic flux, resulting from particle charge and spatial topology; and (iii) interference, dependent upon quantum statistics, resulting from particle indistinguishability under exchange.
We analyze a Hanbury Brown-Twiss geometry in which particles are injected from two independent sources into a mesoscopic conductor in the quantum Hall regime. All partial waves end in different reservoirs without generating any single-particle interference; in particular, there is no single-particle Aharonov-Bohm effect. However, exchange effects lead to two-particle Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in the zero-frequency current cross correlations. We demonstrate that this is related to two-particle orbital entanglement, detected via violation of a Bell inequality. The transport is along edge states and only adiabatic quantum point contacts and normal reservoirs are employed.