Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento

On the unique solution of the quantum mechanical problem of four and more particles. (Comment on a letter by Komarov, Popova and Shablov.)

Bengt R. Karlsson

Published Sep 1, 1978• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02762460

Related papers

On the unique solution of the quantum mechanical problem of four and more particles

Viatcheslav V. Komarov, Anna M. Popova, Vladimir Leonidovich Shablov

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Dec 1, 1977•7 citations

Some Comments on Indistinguishable Particles and Interpretation of the Quantum Mechanical Wave Function

Gerald A. Goldin

Trends in mathematics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

"New Cybernetics and the Application of its Principles in Physics" and "Comment on "Quantum Solution to the Arrow-of-Time Dilemma" of L. Maccone arXiv:0802.0438"

Oleg Kupervasser, Dimitri N. Laikov

The first paper: We describe principles of new cybernetics and use these principles for resolution of basic physical paradoxes. It demonstrates universality of the principles of new cybernetics. The second paper: recent letter by Maccone presents a solution based on the existing laws of quantum mechanics to the arrow-of-time dilemma. He argues that all phenomena in which the entropy decreases must not leave any information (in the observer's memory) of their having occurred because the observer is a part of the whole system. Maccone concludes that quantum mechanics is necessary to his argument, which he believes does not otherwise work in classical mechanics. This Comment consists of four parts. We discuss the basic problems in the first part. This Comment and the previously published Comment by Jennings and Rudolph describes flaws in Maccone's arguments. However, the main argument (erasure of the observer's memory), which was previously formulated in our work and was repeated by Maccone, is correct under the conditions described in this Comment. Moreover, this argument can be used to resolve a reduction paradox (the Schrodinger's Cat paradox) in quantum mechanics. This use is demonstrated in the second part. In the third part, the synchronisation (decoherence) of time arrows is discussed. In the fourth part, the synchronisation (decoherence) of time arrows in quantum gravity is considered.

arXiv:0911.2610•Nov 13, 2009•2 citations

Theory of quanta

Iwo Białynicki‐Birula, Marek Cieplak, Jerzy Zdzisław Kamiński +1 more

1: The Birth of Quantum Theory. 1.1: The radiation of an ideal black body. 1.2: Line spectra and Bohr's model of the atom. 1.3: The quantum conditions of Bohr-Sommerfield. 1.4: Waves of matters. Comments. Problems. 2: Classical Physics - Quantum Physics. 2.1: The difficulties of classical theory. 2.2: The successes of quantum theory. 2.3: Problems with interpretation of quantum theory. 2.4: Quantum theory (1930. Problems. II: Schrodinger's Equation and the Interpretation of its Solutions. 3: Schrodinger's Equation. 3.1: The Schrodinger equation with time. 3.2: The time-dependent Schrodinger equation. Comments. Problems. 4: The Probabilistic Interpretation of the Wavefunction. Comments. Problems. 5: The Motion of a Free Particle in Wave Mechanics. 5.1: The spreading of wave packets. 5.2: The initial problem for Schrodinger's free particle equation. 5.3: The Gaussian wave packet. Comments. Problems. 6: The Momentum of a Particle and the Fourier Transformation of the Wavefunction. Comments. Problems. 7: Description of Experiments in Wave Mechanics and the Heinsberg Uncertainty Principle. 7.1: Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. 7.2: The entropic uncertainty principle. Comments. Problems. 8: A Charged Particle in an Electromagnetic Field. Comments. Problems. 9: The Hydrodynamic Formulation of Wave Mechanics. 9.1: The motion of the probability fluid in an electromagnetic field. Comments. Problems. 10: The Spin of the Elctron and Pauli's Equation. 10.1: The magnetic moment vector. 10.2: Pauli's equation. 10.3: The Stern-Gerlach experiments. Comments. Problems. 11: The Hydrodynamic Picture of Wave Mechanics of a Particle with Spin. Comments. Problems. 12: Ehrenfest's Equations. 12.1: A particle with spin in the electromagnetic field. Problems. 13: Descriptiopn of Particle Motion in Phase Space -- Wigner's Function. Comments. Problems. 14: Mixed States. 14.1: An unpolarized beam as a mixed state. Comments. Problems. III: Solutions of Schrodinger's Equation. 15: Classification of Solutions to Schrodinger's Equation. 15.1: Scattering states. 15.2: The completeness of the set of bound and scattering state wavefunctions. 15.3: Orthogonality of the wavefunctions. 15.4: Development of the system in time. 15.5: Bound and scattered states. Problems. 16: Bound States and Energy. 16.1: The three-dimensional spherically symmetric potential well. Comments. Problems. 17: Scattering States and Collision Cross-sections. 17.1: One-dimensional scattering. 17.2: The method of integral equations. 17.3: Three-dimensional scattering. 17.4: The scattering amplitude. 17.5: The S matrix. 17.6: Collision cross-section. 17.7: The optical theorem. Comments. Problems. 18: Partial Waves and Wave Effects in Scattering. 18.1: Phase shifts. 18.2: The spherical potential hump. 18.3: The Ramsauer-Townsend effect. 18.4: The extinction paradox. Comments. Problems. 19: Resonance States. Problems. 20: The Coulomb Potential. 20.1: Bound states. 20.2: Scattering states. Comments. Problems. 21

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1992•80 citations

A supplement to the paper on ?the problem of three bodies in quantum mechanics?

S. Datta Majumdar

The European Physical Journal A•Oct 1, 1959•0 citations

Comment on "High-Spin Polaron in Lightly Doped CuO$_2$ Planes"

Wei‐Cheng Lee, T. K. Lee

In a recent Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036401 (2011)), Lau, et al. investigated the single hole problem in an effective model containing Cu $d$ and O $2p$ orbitals by exact diagonalization on clusters composed of 32 CuO$_2$ unit cells. With full quantum fluctuations due to the antiferromagnetic (AFM) backgroud, they found that spin-polaron solutions with spin 3/2 become lowest energy solutions in certain region of Brillouin zone (BZ), which they claimed no similiar solutions were obtained in other models or approximations before. In this Comment, we would like to point out that such high-spin polaron solutions have been found in our previous Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057001, (2003)) and many of features described by Lau et al. have in fact been seen in our Letter.

arXiv:1108.5413•Aug 27, 2011•1 citation
The first paper: We describe principles of new cybernetics and use these principles for resolution of basic physical paradoxes. It demonstrates universality of the principles of new cybernetics. The second paper: recent letter by Maccone presents a solution based on the existing laws of quantum mechanics to the arrow-of-time dilemma. He argues that all phenomena in which the entropy decreases must not leave any information (in the observer's memory) of their having occurred because the observer is a part of the whole system. Maccone concludes that quantum mechanics is necessary to his argument, which he believes does not otherwise work in classical mechanics. This Comment consists of four parts. We discuss the basic problems in the first part. This Comment and the previously published Comment by Jennings and Rudolph describes flaws in Maccone's arguments. However, the main argument (erasure of the observer's memory), which was previously formulated in our work and was repeated by Maccone, is correct under the conditions described in this Comment. Moreover, this argument can be used to resolve a reduction paradox (the Schrodinger's Cat paradox) in quantum mechanics. This use is demonstrated in the second part. In the third part, the synchronisation (decoherence) of time arrows is discussed. In the fourth part, the synchronisation (decoherence) of time arrows in quantum gravity is considered.
1: The Birth of Quantum Theory. 1.1: The radiation of an ideal black body. 1.2: Line spectra and Bohr's model of the atom. 1.3: The quantum conditions of Bohr-Sommerfield. 1.4: Waves of matters. Comments. Problems. 2: Classical Physics - Quantum Physics. 2.1: The difficulties of classical theory. 2.2: The successes of quantum theory. 2.3: Problems with interpretation of quantum theory. 2.4: Quantum theory (1930. Problems. II: Schrodinger's Equation and the Interpretation of its Solutions. 3: Schrodinger's Equation. 3.1: The Schrodinger equation with time. 3.2: The time-dependent Schrodinger equation. Comments. Problems. 4: The Probabilistic Interpretation of the Wavefunction. Comments. Problems. 5: The Motion of a Free Particle in Wave Mechanics. 5.1: The spreading of wave packets. 5.2: The initial problem for Schrodinger's free particle equation. 5.3: The Gaussian wave packet. Comments. Problems. 6: The Momentum of a Particle and the Fourier Transformation of the Wavefunction. Comments. Problems. 7: Description of Experiments in Wave Mechanics and the Heinsberg Uncertainty Principle. 7.1: Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. 7.2: The entropic uncertainty principle. Comments. Problems. 8: A Charged Particle in an Electromagnetic Field. Comments. Problems. 9: The Hydrodynamic Formulation of Wave Mechanics. 9.1: The motion of the probability fluid in an electromagnetic field. Comments. Problems. 10: The Spin of the Elctron and Pauli's Equation. 10.1: The magnetic moment vector. 10.2: Pauli's equation. 10.3: The Stern-Gerlach experiments. Comments. Problems. 11: The Hydrodynamic Picture of Wave Mechanics of a Particle with Spin. Comments. Problems. 12: Ehrenfest's Equations. 12.1: A particle with spin in the electromagnetic field. Problems. 13: Descriptiopn of Particle Motion in Phase Space -- Wigner's Function. Comments. Problems. 14: Mixed States. 14.1: An unpolarized beam as a mixed state. Comments. Problems. III: Solutions of Schrodinger's Equation. 15: Classification of Solutions to Schrodinger's Equation. 15.1: Scattering states. 15.2: The completeness of the set of bound and scattering state wavefunctions. 15.3: Orthogonality of the wavefunctions. 15.4: Development of the system in time. 15.5: Bound and scattered states. Problems. 16: Bound States and Energy. 16.1: The three-dimensional spherically symmetric potential well. Comments. Problems. 17: Scattering States and Collision Cross-sections. 17.1: One-dimensional scattering. 17.2: The method of integral equations. 17.3: Three-dimensional scattering. 17.4: The scattering amplitude. 17.5: The S matrix. 17.6: Collision cross-section. 17.7: The optical theorem. Comments. Problems. 18: Partial Waves and Wave Effects in Scattering. 18.1: Phase shifts. 18.2: The spherical potential hump. 18.3: The Ramsauer-Townsend effect. 18.4: The extinction paradox. Comments. Problems. 19: Resonance States. Problems. 20: The Coulomb Potential. 20.1: Bound states. 20.2: Scattering states. Comments. Problems. 21
Comment on "High-Spin Polaron in Lightly Doped CuO2_22​ Planes"
In a recent Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036401 (2011)), Lau, et al. investigated the single hole problem in an effective model containing Cu ddd and O 2p2p2p orbitals by exact diagonalization on clusters composed of 32 CuO2_22​ unit cells. With full quantum fluctuations due to the antiferromagnetic (AFM) backgroud, they found that spin-polaron solutions with spin 3/2 become lowest energy solutions in certain region of Brillouin zone (BZ), which they claimed no similiar solutions were obtained in other models or approximations before. In this Comment, we would like to point out that such high-spin polaron solutions have been found in our previous Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057001, (2003)) and many of features described by Lau et al. have in fact been seen in our Letter.