Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures

Detecting quantum and classical correlations using quantum dot system

K. Berrada

Published Jun 19, 2013• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physe.2013.06.011

Related papers

Quantum dot arrays: preparation and detection of non-classical states

Günter Mahler A, Rainer Wawer

Superlattices and Microstructures•Jan 1, 1997•2 citations

Quantum dots as parafermion detectors

Raphael L. R. C. Teixeira, Luis G. G. V. Dias da Silva

Parafermionic zero modes, ${\mathbb{Z}}_{n}$-symmetric generalizations of the well-known ${\mathbb{Z}}_{2}$ Majorana zero modes, can emerge as edge states in topologically nontrivial strongly correlated systems displaying fractionalized excitations. In this paper, we investigate how signatures of parafermionic zero modes can be detected by its effects on the properties of a quantum dot tunnel-coupled to a system hosting such states. Concretely, we consider a strongly correlated one-dimensional fermionic model supporting ${\mathbb{Z}}_{4}$ parafermionic zero modes coupled to an interacting quantum dot at one of its ends. By using a combination of density matrix renormalization group calculations and analytical approaches, we show that the dot's zero-energy spectral function and average occupation numbers can be used to distinguish between trivial, ${\mathbb{Z}}_{4}$ and $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{\mathbb{Z}}_{2}$ phases of the system. The present work opens the prospect of using quantum dots as detection tools to probe nontrivial topological phases in strongly correlated systems.

arXiv:2103.16278•Physical Review Research•Jul 2, 2021•6 citations

Creating quantum correlations between quantum-dot spins

Mete Atatüre

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Distinguishing Quantum and Classical Baths via Correlation Measurements

Fink, Thomas, Hendrik Bluhm

Investigations of quantum mechanical effects in macroscopic systems are of great interest to shed light onto the question where and how the transition to the classical world appears. It is also of practical relevance to determine if a bath dephasing a qubit can be described classically or requires a quantum mechanical treatment. We propose a measurement scheme to detect quantum backaction via correlation measurements to answer this question for a bath coupled to a single qubit. The presence of backaction leads to a dependence of correlations of subsequent initialization-evolution-readout cycles on how the qubit is manipulated in between. We compute the autocorrelation function for both an instructive spin model and the realistic case of an electron spin coupled to a bath of $10^6$ nuclear spins, as found in gated GaAs quantum dots, and show that backaction from the qubit onto the nuclear spin bath should be detectable even in such a large system.

arXiv:1402.0235•Feb 2, 2014•2 citations

Toward a quantum computing algorithm to quantify classical and quantum correlation of system states

M. Mahdian, H. Davoodi Yeganeh

arXiv:2111.09000•Quantum Information Processing•Nov 19, 2021•6 citations

Comparison and limitations of quantum lidar in the single-photon regime

Anthony Drouin, Jean-Philippe Bourgoin, Sara Hosseini +3 more

Quantum lidar leverages the quantum properties of light to gain advantages over classical lidar, such as enhancing range accuracy and reducing the emitted optical power needed to detect a target. The low optical power makes quantum lidar especially attractive for minimizing the probability of being detected by an adversary. Various quantum sources have been considered for quantum lidar; however, a practical comparison between such widely different systems is challenging. Here, we develop a theoretical model tailored to quantum lidar for stealth ranging and imaging, and compare the performance of such systems using an attenuated pulsed laser, a quantum dot single-photon source, and a spontaneous parametric down-conversion correlated photon pair source. To ensure a fair comparison, all sources employ time correlations for detection and are equalized in terms of optical power and detectability by an adversary. Furthermore, we demonstrate the limitation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a sole metric, as it ignores the acquisition time required to confidently identify a target. To address the limitation of SNR, we supplement this metric with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. With the inclusion of ROC curves, we find that the pulsed laser and the quantum dot single-photon source outperform the correlated photon pair source when an adversary possesses a non-photon-number-resolving detector. In contrast, when facing a photon-number-resolving detector, the quantum dot single-photon source remains optimal while the correlated photon pair source outperforms the pulsed laser. Our findings demonstrate that the use of a correlated photon pair source for quantum lidar does not always outperform alternative sources with equal SNR and optical power. Finally, using ROC curves, we establish the practical range limitations of quantum lidar.

Optica Quantum•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations
Parafermionic zero modes, Zn{\mathbb{Z}}_{n}Zn​-symmetric generalizations of the well-known Z2{\mathbb{Z}}_{2}Z2​ Majorana zero modes, can emerge as edge states in topologically nontrivial strongly correlated systems displaying fractionalized excitations. In this paper, we investigate how signatures of parafermionic zero modes can be detected by its effects on the properties of a quantum dot tunnel-coupled to a system hosting such states. Concretely, we consider a strongly correlated one-dimensional fermionic model supporting Z4{\mathbb{Z}}_{4}Z4​ parafermionic zero modes coupled to an interacting quantum dot at one of its ends. By using a combination of density matrix renormalization group calculations and analytical approaches, we show that the dot's zero-energy spectral function and average occupation numbers can be used to distinguish between trivial, Z4{\mathbb{Z}}_{4}Z4​ and $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{\mathbb{Z}}_{2}$ phases of the system. The present work opens the prospect of using quantum dots as detection tools to probe nontrivial topological phases in strongly correlated systems.
Investigations of quantum mechanical effects in macroscopic systems are of great interest to shed light onto the question where and how the transition to the classical world appears. It is also of practical relevance to determine if a bath dephasing a qubit can be described classically or requires a quantum mechanical treatment. We propose a measurement scheme to detect quantum backaction via correlation measurements to answer this question for a bath coupled to a single qubit. The presence of backaction leads to a dependence of correlations of subsequent initialization-evolution-readout cycles on how the qubit is manipulated in between. We compute the autocorrelation function for both an instructive spin model and the realistic case of an electron spin coupled to a bath of 10610^6106 nuclear spins, as found in gated GaAs quantum dots, and show that backaction from the qubit onto the nuclear spin bath should be detectable even in such a large system.
Quantum lidar leverages the quantum properties of light to gain advantages over classical lidar, such as enhancing range accuracy and reducing the emitted optical power needed to detect a target. The low optical power makes quantum lidar especially attractive for minimizing the probability of being detected by an adversary. Various quantum sources have been considered for quantum lidar; however, a practical comparison between such widely different systems is challenging. Here, we develop a theoretical model tailored to quantum lidar for stealth ranging and imaging, and compare the performance of such systems using an attenuated pulsed laser, a quantum dot single-photon source, and a spontaneous parametric down-conversion correlated photon pair source. To ensure a fair comparison, all sources employ time correlations for detection and are equalized in terms of optical power and detectability by an adversary. Furthermore, we demonstrate the limitation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a sole metric, as it ignores the acquisition time required to confidently identify a target. To address the limitation of SNR, we supplement this metric with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. With the inclusion of ROC curves, we find that the pulsed laser and the quantum dot single-photon source outperform the correlated photon pair source when an adversary possesses a non-photon-number-resolving detector. In contrast, when facing a photon-number-resolving detector, the quantum dot single-photon source remains optimal while the correlated photon pair source outperforms the pulsed laser. Our findings demonstrate that the use of a correlated photon pair source for quantum lidar does not always outperform alternative sources with equal SNR and optical power. Finally, using ROC curves, we establish the practical range limitations of quantum lidar.